Cargando…

Feasibility study of temporary permanent pacemaker in patients with conduction block after TAVR

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on the use of temporary permanent pacemaker (TPPM) to reduce unnecessary PPM in patients with high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the feasibility of TPPM in patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Sanshuai, Liu, Xinmin, Lu, Zhi-Nan, Yao, Jing, Yin, Chengqian, Wu, Wenhui, Yuan, Fei, Luo, Taiyang, Liu, Ran, Yan, Yunfeng, Zhang, Qian, Pu, Junzhou, Modine, Thomas, Piazza, Nicolo, Jilaihawi, Hasan, Jiang, Zhengming, Song, Guangyuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36760563
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.978394
_version_ 1784883765785395200
author Chang, Sanshuai
Liu, Xinmin
Lu, Zhi-Nan
Yao, Jing
Yin, Chengqian
Wu, Wenhui
Yuan, Fei
Luo, Taiyang
Liu, Ran
Yan, Yunfeng
Zhang, Qian
Pu, Junzhou
Modine, Thomas
Piazza, Nicolo
Jilaihawi, Hasan
Jiang, Zhengming
Song, Guangyuan
author_facet Chang, Sanshuai
Liu, Xinmin
Lu, Zhi-Nan
Yao, Jing
Yin, Chengqian
Wu, Wenhui
Yuan, Fei
Luo, Taiyang
Liu, Ran
Yan, Yunfeng
Zhang, Qian
Pu, Junzhou
Modine, Thomas
Piazza, Nicolo
Jilaihawi, Hasan
Jiang, Zhengming
Song, Guangyuan
author_sort Chang, Sanshuai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on the use of temporary permanent pacemaker (TPPM) to reduce unnecessary PPM in patients with high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the feasibility of TPPM in patients with HAVB after TAVR to provide prolonged pacing as a bridge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and eleven consecutive patients undergoing TAVR were screened from August 2021 to June 2022. Patients with HAVB eligible for PPM were included. TPPM were used in these patients instead of conventional temporary pacing or early PPM. Patients were followed up for 1 month. Holter and pacemaker interrogation were used to determine whether to implant PPM. RESULTS: Twenty one patients met the inclusion criteria for TPPM, of which 14 patients were third-degree AVB, 1 patient was second-degree AVB, 6 patients were first degree AVB with PR interval > 240 ms and LBBB with QRS duration > 150 ms. TPPM were placed on the 21 patients for 35 ± 7 days. Among 15 patients with HAVB, 26.7% of them (n = 4) recovered to sinus rhythm; 46.7% (n = 7) recovered to sinus rhythm with bundle branch block. The remains of 26.7% patients (n = 4) still had third-degree AVB and received PPM. For patients with first-degree AVB and LBBB, PR interval shortened to < 200 ms in all 6 patients and LBBB recovered in 2 patients. TPPM were successfully removed from all patients and no procedure-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: TPPM is reliable and safe in the small sample of patients with conduction block after TAVR to provide certain buffer time to distinguish whether a PPM is necessary. Future studies with larger sample are needed for further validation of the current results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9905124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99051242023-02-08 Feasibility study of temporary permanent pacemaker in patients with conduction block after TAVR Chang, Sanshuai Liu, Xinmin Lu, Zhi-Nan Yao, Jing Yin, Chengqian Wu, Wenhui Yuan, Fei Luo, Taiyang Liu, Ran Yan, Yunfeng Zhang, Qian Pu, Junzhou Modine, Thomas Piazza, Nicolo Jilaihawi, Hasan Jiang, Zhengming Song, Guangyuan Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on the use of temporary permanent pacemaker (TPPM) to reduce unnecessary PPM in patients with high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the feasibility of TPPM in patients with HAVB after TAVR to provide prolonged pacing as a bridge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and eleven consecutive patients undergoing TAVR were screened from August 2021 to June 2022. Patients with HAVB eligible for PPM were included. TPPM were used in these patients instead of conventional temporary pacing or early PPM. Patients were followed up for 1 month. Holter and pacemaker interrogation were used to determine whether to implant PPM. RESULTS: Twenty one patients met the inclusion criteria for TPPM, of which 14 patients were third-degree AVB, 1 patient was second-degree AVB, 6 patients were first degree AVB with PR interval > 240 ms and LBBB with QRS duration > 150 ms. TPPM were placed on the 21 patients for 35 ± 7 days. Among 15 patients with HAVB, 26.7% of them (n = 4) recovered to sinus rhythm; 46.7% (n = 7) recovered to sinus rhythm with bundle branch block. The remains of 26.7% patients (n = 4) still had third-degree AVB and received PPM. For patients with first-degree AVB and LBBB, PR interval shortened to < 200 ms in all 6 patients and LBBB recovered in 2 patients. TPPM were successfully removed from all patients and no procedure-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: TPPM is reliable and safe in the small sample of patients with conduction block after TAVR to provide certain buffer time to distinguish whether a PPM is necessary. Future studies with larger sample are needed for further validation of the current results. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9905124/ /pubmed/36760563 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.978394 Text en Copyright © 2023 Chang, Liu, Lu, Yao, Yin, Wu, Yuan, Luo, Liu, Yan, Zhang, Pu, Modine, Piazza, Jilaihawi, Jiang and Song. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Chang, Sanshuai
Liu, Xinmin
Lu, Zhi-Nan
Yao, Jing
Yin, Chengqian
Wu, Wenhui
Yuan, Fei
Luo, Taiyang
Liu, Ran
Yan, Yunfeng
Zhang, Qian
Pu, Junzhou
Modine, Thomas
Piazza, Nicolo
Jilaihawi, Hasan
Jiang, Zhengming
Song, Guangyuan
Feasibility study of temporary permanent pacemaker in patients with conduction block after TAVR
title Feasibility study of temporary permanent pacemaker in patients with conduction block after TAVR
title_full Feasibility study of temporary permanent pacemaker in patients with conduction block after TAVR
title_fullStr Feasibility study of temporary permanent pacemaker in patients with conduction block after TAVR
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility study of temporary permanent pacemaker in patients with conduction block after TAVR
title_short Feasibility study of temporary permanent pacemaker in patients with conduction block after TAVR
title_sort feasibility study of temporary permanent pacemaker in patients with conduction block after tavr
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36760563
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.978394
work_keys_str_mv AT changsanshuai feasibilitystudyoftemporarypermanentpacemakerinpatientswithconductionblockaftertavr
AT liuxinmin feasibilitystudyoftemporarypermanentpacemakerinpatientswithconductionblockaftertavr
AT luzhinan feasibilitystudyoftemporarypermanentpacemakerinpatientswithconductionblockaftertavr
AT yaojing feasibilitystudyoftemporarypermanentpacemakerinpatientswithconductionblockaftertavr
AT yinchengqian feasibilitystudyoftemporarypermanentpacemakerinpatientswithconductionblockaftertavr
AT wuwenhui feasibilitystudyoftemporarypermanentpacemakerinpatientswithconductionblockaftertavr
AT yuanfei feasibilitystudyoftemporarypermanentpacemakerinpatientswithconductionblockaftertavr
AT luotaiyang feasibilitystudyoftemporarypermanentpacemakerinpatientswithconductionblockaftertavr
AT liuran feasibilitystudyoftemporarypermanentpacemakerinpatientswithconductionblockaftertavr
AT yanyunfeng feasibilitystudyoftemporarypermanentpacemakerinpatientswithconductionblockaftertavr
AT zhangqian feasibilitystudyoftemporarypermanentpacemakerinpatientswithconductionblockaftertavr
AT pujunzhou feasibilitystudyoftemporarypermanentpacemakerinpatientswithconductionblockaftertavr
AT modinethomas feasibilitystudyoftemporarypermanentpacemakerinpatientswithconductionblockaftertavr
AT piazzanicolo feasibilitystudyoftemporarypermanentpacemakerinpatientswithconductionblockaftertavr
AT jilaihawihasan feasibilitystudyoftemporarypermanentpacemakerinpatientswithconductionblockaftertavr
AT jiangzhengming feasibilitystudyoftemporarypermanentpacemakerinpatientswithconductionblockaftertavr
AT songguangyuan feasibilitystudyoftemporarypermanentpacemakerinpatientswithconductionblockaftertavr