Cargando…

Cabozantinib exposure–response analysis for the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial of nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib in first-line advanced renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE: In the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial, intravenous nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) plus oral cabozantinib (40 mg/day) improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus sunitinib as first-line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To support cabozantinib dosing with the combination, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tran, Benjamin Duy, Li, Jing, Ly, Neang, Faggioni, Raffaella, Roskos, Lorin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36625894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-022-04500-9
_version_ 1784883779197730816
author Tran, Benjamin Duy
Li, Jing
Ly, Neang
Faggioni, Raffaella
Roskos, Lorin
author_facet Tran, Benjamin Duy
Li, Jing
Ly, Neang
Faggioni, Raffaella
Roskos, Lorin
author_sort Tran, Benjamin Duy
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial, intravenous nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) plus oral cabozantinib (40 mg/day) improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus sunitinib as first-line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To support cabozantinib dosing with the combination, this exposure–response analysis characterized the relationship of cabozantinib exposure with clinical endpoints. METHODS: Dose modification was allowed with cabozantinib (holds and reductions) to manage adverse events (AEs). The population pharmacokinetics analysis was updated and used to generate individual predicted cabozantinib exposure measures. Kaplan–Meier plots and time-to-event Cox proportional hazard (CPH) exposure–response models characterized the relationship of cabozantinib exposure with PFS, dose modifications, and selected AEs. RESULTS: Kaplan–Meier plots showed no clear difference in PFS across cabozantinib exposure quartiles. Cabozantinib exposure did not significantly affect the hazard of PFS in the CPH base model nor in the final model. In contrast, baseline albumin and nivolumab clearance had a significant effect on PFS. There was no significant relationship between cabozantinib clearance and risk of dose modification, but a significant relationship was identified between cabozantinib exposure and Grade ≥ 1 palmar-plantar-erythrodysesthesia and Grade ≥ 3 diarrhea in the exposure–response analysis. CONCLUSION: To optimize individual cabozantinib exposure, these data support the dose modification strategies in CheckMate 9ER for cabozantinib in patients with advanced RCC when combined with nivolumab. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00280-022-04500-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9905187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99051872023-02-08 Cabozantinib exposure–response analysis for the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial of nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib in first-line advanced renal cell carcinoma Tran, Benjamin Duy Li, Jing Ly, Neang Faggioni, Raffaella Roskos, Lorin Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Original Article PURPOSE: In the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial, intravenous nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) plus oral cabozantinib (40 mg/day) improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus sunitinib as first-line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To support cabozantinib dosing with the combination, this exposure–response analysis characterized the relationship of cabozantinib exposure with clinical endpoints. METHODS: Dose modification was allowed with cabozantinib (holds and reductions) to manage adverse events (AEs). The population pharmacokinetics analysis was updated and used to generate individual predicted cabozantinib exposure measures. Kaplan–Meier plots and time-to-event Cox proportional hazard (CPH) exposure–response models characterized the relationship of cabozantinib exposure with PFS, dose modifications, and selected AEs. RESULTS: Kaplan–Meier plots showed no clear difference in PFS across cabozantinib exposure quartiles. Cabozantinib exposure did not significantly affect the hazard of PFS in the CPH base model nor in the final model. In contrast, baseline albumin and nivolumab clearance had a significant effect on PFS. There was no significant relationship between cabozantinib clearance and risk of dose modification, but a significant relationship was identified between cabozantinib exposure and Grade ≥ 1 palmar-plantar-erythrodysesthesia and Grade ≥ 3 diarrhea in the exposure–response analysis. CONCLUSION: To optimize individual cabozantinib exposure, these data support the dose modification strategies in CheckMate 9ER for cabozantinib in patients with advanced RCC when combined with nivolumab. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00280-022-04500-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-01-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9905187/ /pubmed/36625894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-022-04500-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Tran, Benjamin Duy
Li, Jing
Ly, Neang
Faggioni, Raffaella
Roskos, Lorin
Cabozantinib exposure–response analysis for the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial of nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib in first-line advanced renal cell carcinoma
title Cabozantinib exposure–response analysis for the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial of nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib in first-line advanced renal cell carcinoma
title_full Cabozantinib exposure–response analysis for the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial of nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib in first-line advanced renal cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Cabozantinib exposure–response analysis for the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial of nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib in first-line advanced renal cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Cabozantinib exposure–response analysis for the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial of nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib in first-line advanced renal cell carcinoma
title_short Cabozantinib exposure–response analysis for the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial of nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib in first-line advanced renal cell carcinoma
title_sort cabozantinib exposure–response analysis for the phase 3 checkmate 9er trial of nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib in first-line advanced renal cell carcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36625894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-022-04500-9
work_keys_str_mv AT tranbenjaminduy cabozantinibexposureresponseanalysisforthephase3checkmate9ertrialofnivolumabpluscabozantinibversussunitinibinfirstlineadvancedrenalcellcarcinoma
AT lijing cabozantinibexposureresponseanalysisforthephase3checkmate9ertrialofnivolumabpluscabozantinibversussunitinibinfirstlineadvancedrenalcellcarcinoma
AT lyneang cabozantinibexposureresponseanalysisforthephase3checkmate9ertrialofnivolumabpluscabozantinibversussunitinibinfirstlineadvancedrenalcellcarcinoma
AT faggioniraffaella cabozantinibexposureresponseanalysisforthephase3checkmate9ertrialofnivolumabpluscabozantinibversussunitinibinfirstlineadvancedrenalcellcarcinoma
AT roskoslorin cabozantinibexposureresponseanalysisforthephase3checkmate9ertrialofnivolumabpluscabozantinibversussunitinibinfirstlineadvancedrenalcellcarcinoma