Cargando…

Supporting Bystanders and Other Staff Exposed to Negative Workplace Behaviour: Developing and Testing the IMO Intervention Framework in the Clinical Workplace

BACKGROUND: Medical student and health-care staff bullying remain international concerns. Our understanding about what might solve such problems is still developing. A common approach suggested for bystanders to bullying is that they challenge or “stand up” to the bully. At the same time, the consid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gamble Blakey, Althea, Anderson, Lynley, Smith-Han, Kelby, Collins, Emma, Berryman, Elizabeth, Wilkinson, Tim J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36761370
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S379429
_version_ 1784883782165200896
author Gamble Blakey, Althea
Anderson, Lynley
Smith-Han, Kelby
Collins, Emma
Berryman, Elizabeth
Wilkinson, Tim J
author_facet Gamble Blakey, Althea
Anderson, Lynley
Smith-Han, Kelby
Collins, Emma
Berryman, Elizabeth
Wilkinson, Tim J
author_sort Gamble Blakey, Althea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medical student and health-care staff bullying remain international concerns. Our understanding about what might solve such problems is still developing. A common approach suggested for bystanders to bullying is that they challenge or “stand up” to the bully. At the same time, the considerable risks should they act (eg, verbal rebuke) are rarely acknowledged, and neither is the potential for considerable cognitive dissonance should they choose not to. METHODS: Drawing on a substantial literature review, we developed an interventional program, initially with medical student bullying in mind, that generally employed a discourse for values cultivation. We implemented and evaluated this program through 6 cycles of action research methodology in 6 different departments of one tertiary teaching hospital. Data include individual interviews, discussions with key participants plus freehand comments from wider staff’s workshop evaluations. RESULTS: Alongside others, an early serendipitous finding was the “IMO” [Indirect, focus on Me, focus on Outcome] framework, intended for bystanders to student bullying. From using this framework, participants reported developing confidence in tackling negative behaviours, that interactions had better outcomes and that the workplace atmosphere felt more relaxed. It’s use also significantly reduced cognitive dissonance. Encouragingly, participants went on to use IMO for staff–staff bullying incidents, and other common negative behaviours. We attribute IMO’s utility to its memorability, simplicity and for catering to the many possible causes of bullying, including values issues, without perpetuating or creating conflict. CONCLUSION: The IMO framework is offered as a widely usable framework for all staff in a clinical environment – a useful addition to popular frameworks used in the clinical workplace, ideas from which might also help these be further refined. Further evaluation would establish whether IMO invites long-term change and its utility in other contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9905205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99052052023-02-08 Supporting Bystanders and Other Staff Exposed to Negative Workplace Behaviour: Developing and Testing the IMO Intervention Framework in the Clinical Workplace Gamble Blakey, Althea Anderson, Lynley Smith-Han, Kelby Collins, Emma Berryman, Elizabeth Wilkinson, Tim J Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research BACKGROUND: Medical student and health-care staff bullying remain international concerns. Our understanding about what might solve such problems is still developing. A common approach suggested for bystanders to bullying is that they challenge or “stand up” to the bully. At the same time, the considerable risks should they act (eg, verbal rebuke) are rarely acknowledged, and neither is the potential for considerable cognitive dissonance should they choose not to. METHODS: Drawing on a substantial literature review, we developed an interventional program, initially with medical student bullying in mind, that generally employed a discourse for values cultivation. We implemented and evaluated this program through 6 cycles of action research methodology in 6 different departments of one tertiary teaching hospital. Data include individual interviews, discussions with key participants plus freehand comments from wider staff’s workshop evaluations. RESULTS: Alongside others, an early serendipitous finding was the “IMO” [Indirect, focus on Me, focus on Outcome] framework, intended for bystanders to student bullying. From using this framework, participants reported developing confidence in tackling negative behaviours, that interactions had better outcomes and that the workplace atmosphere felt more relaxed. It’s use also significantly reduced cognitive dissonance. Encouragingly, participants went on to use IMO for staff–staff bullying incidents, and other common negative behaviours. We attribute IMO’s utility to its memorability, simplicity and for catering to the many possible causes of bullying, including values issues, without perpetuating or creating conflict. CONCLUSION: The IMO framework is offered as a widely usable framework for all staff in a clinical environment – a useful addition to popular frameworks used in the clinical workplace, ideas from which might also help these be further refined. Further evaluation would establish whether IMO invites long-term change and its utility in other contexts. Dove 2023-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9905205/ /pubmed/36761370 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S379429 Text en © 2023 Gamble Blakey et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Gamble Blakey, Althea
Anderson, Lynley
Smith-Han, Kelby
Collins, Emma
Berryman, Elizabeth
Wilkinson, Tim J
Supporting Bystanders and Other Staff Exposed to Negative Workplace Behaviour: Developing and Testing the IMO Intervention Framework in the Clinical Workplace
title Supporting Bystanders and Other Staff Exposed to Negative Workplace Behaviour: Developing and Testing the IMO Intervention Framework in the Clinical Workplace
title_full Supporting Bystanders and Other Staff Exposed to Negative Workplace Behaviour: Developing and Testing the IMO Intervention Framework in the Clinical Workplace
title_fullStr Supporting Bystanders and Other Staff Exposed to Negative Workplace Behaviour: Developing and Testing the IMO Intervention Framework in the Clinical Workplace
title_full_unstemmed Supporting Bystanders and Other Staff Exposed to Negative Workplace Behaviour: Developing and Testing the IMO Intervention Framework in the Clinical Workplace
title_short Supporting Bystanders and Other Staff Exposed to Negative Workplace Behaviour: Developing and Testing the IMO Intervention Framework in the Clinical Workplace
title_sort supporting bystanders and other staff exposed to negative workplace behaviour: developing and testing the imo intervention framework in the clinical workplace
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36761370
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S379429
work_keys_str_mv AT gambleblakeyalthea supportingbystandersandotherstaffexposedtonegativeworkplacebehaviourdevelopingandtestingtheimointerventionframeworkintheclinicalworkplace
AT andersonlynley supportingbystandersandotherstaffexposedtonegativeworkplacebehaviourdevelopingandtestingtheimointerventionframeworkintheclinicalworkplace
AT smithhankelby supportingbystandersandotherstaffexposedtonegativeworkplacebehaviourdevelopingandtestingtheimointerventionframeworkintheclinicalworkplace
AT collinsemma supportingbystandersandotherstaffexposedtonegativeworkplacebehaviourdevelopingandtestingtheimointerventionframeworkintheclinicalworkplace
AT berrymanelizabeth supportingbystandersandotherstaffexposedtonegativeworkplacebehaviourdevelopingandtestingtheimointerventionframeworkintheclinicalworkplace
AT wilkinsontimj supportingbystandersandotherstaffexposedtonegativeworkplacebehaviourdevelopingandtestingtheimointerventionframeworkintheclinicalworkplace