Cargando…

Assessment of fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary stenosis using optical coherence tomography-based machine learning

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning (ML)- fractional flow reserve (FFR) based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) with wire-based FFR irrespective of the coronary territory. BACKGROUND: ML techniques for assessing hemodynamics features i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cha, Jung-Joon, Nguyen, Ngoc-Luu, Tran, Cong, Shin, Won-Yong, Lee, Seul-Gee, Lee, Yong-Joon, Lee, Seung-Jun, Hong, Sung-Jin, Ahn, Chul-Min, Kim, Byeong-Keuk, Ko, Young-Guk, Choi, Donghoon, Hong, Myeong-Ki, Jang, Yangsoo, Ha, Jinyong, Kim, Jung-Sun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36760568
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1082214
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning (ML)- fractional flow reserve (FFR) based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) with wire-based FFR irrespective of the coronary territory. BACKGROUND: ML techniques for assessing hemodynamics features including FFR in coronary artery disease have been developed based on various imaging modalities. However, there is no study using OCT-based ML models for all coronary artery territories. METHODS: OCT and FFR data were obtained for 356 individual coronary lesions in 130 patients. The training and testing groups were divided in a ratio of 4:1. The ML-FFR was derived for the testing group and compared with the wire-based FFR in terms of the diagnosis of ischemia (FFR ≤ 0.80). RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was 62.6 years. The numbers of the left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries were 130 (36.5%), 110 (30.9%), and 116 (32.6%), respectively. Using seven major features, the ML-FFR showed strong correlation (r = 0.8782, P < 0.001) with the wire-based FFR. The ML-FFR predicted wire-based FFR ≤ 0.80 in the test set with sensitivity of 98.3%, specificity of 61.5%, and overall accuracy of 91.7% (area under the curve: 0.948). External validation showed good correlation (r = 0.7884, P < 0.001) and accuracy of 83.2% (area under the curve: 0.912). CONCLUSION: OCT-based ML-FFR showed good diagnostic performance in predicting FFR irrespective of the coronary territory. Because the study was a small-size study, the results should be warranted the performance in further large-scale research.