Cargando…

An experimental, behavioral, and chemical analysis of food limitations in mutualistic Crematogaster ant symbionts inhabiting Macaranga host plants

Obligate mutualistic plant–ants are often constrained by their plant partner's capacity to provide resources. However, despite this limitation, some ant partners actively reject potential prey items and instead drop them from the plant rather than consuming them, leaving the ants entirely relia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Houadria, Mickal Y. I., Barone, Giulio, Fayle, Tom M., Schmitt, Thomas, Konik, Petr, Feldhaar, Heike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9760
_version_ 1784883799967924224
author Houadria, Mickal Y. I.
Barone, Giulio
Fayle, Tom M.
Schmitt, Thomas
Konik, Petr
Feldhaar, Heike
author_facet Houadria, Mickal Y. I.
Barone, Giulio
Fayle, Tom M.
Schmitt, Thomas
Konik, Petr
Feldhaar, Heike
author_sort Houadria, Mickal Y. I.
collection PubMed
description Obligate mutualistic plant–ants are often constrained by their plant partner's capacity to provide resources. However, despite this limitation, some ant partners actively reject potential prey items and instead drop them from the plant rather than consuming them, leaving the ants entirely reliant on host plant‐provided food, including that provided indirectly by the symbiotic scale insects that ants tend inside the plants. This dependency potentially increases the efficiency of these ants in defending their host. We hypothesize that if this ant behavior was beneficial to the symbiosis, prey rejection by ants would be observed across multiple plant host species. We also hypothesize that plant‐provided food items and symbiotic scale insects from other ant plants should be rejected. We address these hypotheses in the Crematogaster ant–Macaranga plant system, in which plants provide living space and food, while ants protect plants from herbivory. We observed food acceptance and rejection behavior across five ant species and three plant host species. Ants were offered three types of food: termites as a surrogate herbivore, symbiotic scale insects, and nutritious food bodies (FB) produced by different host plant species. The unique ant species living in M. winkleri was the most likely to reject food items not provided by the plant species, followed by ants in M. glandibracteolata, while ants in M. pearsonii accepted most items offered to them. Using stable isotopes, chemical cues, and proteomic analyses, we demonstrate that this behavior was not related to differences between plant species in nutritional quality or composition of FB. Isotopic signatures revealed that certain species are primary consumers but other ant species can be secondary consumers even where surrogate herbivores are rejected, although these values varied depending on the ant developmental stage and plant species. Macaranga pearsonii and M. glandibracteolata, the two most closely related plant species, had most similar surface chemical cues of FB. However, M. glandibracteolata had strongest differences in food body nutritional content, isotopic signatures, and protein composition from either of the other two plant species studied. Taken together we believe our results point toward potential host coercion of symbiont ants by plants in the genus Macaranga Thouars (Euphorbiaceae).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9905419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99054192023-02-09 An experimental, behavioral, and chemical analysis of food limitations in mutualistic Crematogaster ant symbionts inhabiting Macaranga host plants Houadria, Mickal Y. I. Barone, Giulio Fayle, Tom M. Schmitt, Thomas Konik, Petr Feldhaar, Heike Ecol Evol Research Articles Obligate mutualistic plant–ants are often constrained by their plant partner's capacity to provide resources. However, despite this limitation, some ant partners actively reject potential prey items and instead drop them from the plant rather than consuming them, leaving the ants entirely reliant on host plant‐provided food, including that provided indirectly by the symbiotic scale insects that ants tend inside the plants. This dependency potentially increases the efficiency of these ants in defending their host. We hypothesize that if this ant behavior was beneficial to the symbiosis, prey rejection by ants would be observed across multiple plant host species. We also hypothesize that plant‐provided food items and symbiotic scale insects from other ant plants should be rejected. We address these hypotheses in the Crematogaster ant–Macaranga plant system, in which plants provide living space and food, while ants protect plants from herbivory. We observed food acceptance and rejection behavior across five ant species and three plant host species. Ants were offered three types of food: termites as a surrogate herbivore, symbiotic scale insects, and nutritious food bodies (FB) produced by different host plant species. The unique ant species living in M. winkleri was the most likely to reject food items not provided by the plant species, followed by ants in M. glandibracteolata, while ants in M. pearsonii accepted most items offered to them. Using stable isotopes, chemical cues, and proteomic analyses, we demonstrate that this behavior was not related to differences between plant species in nutritional quality or composition of FB. Isotopic signatures revealed that certain species are primary consumers but other ant species can be secondary consumers even where surrogate herbivores are rejected, although these values varied depending on the ant developmental stage and plant species. Macaranga pearsonii and M. glandibracteolata, the two most closely related plant species, had most similar surface chemical cues of FB. However, M. glandibracteolata had strongest differences in food body nutritional content, isotopic signatures, and protein composition from either of the other two plant species studied. Taken together we believe our results point toward potential host coercion of symbiont ants by plants in the genus Macaranga Thouars (Euphorbiaceae). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9905419/ /pubmed/36778840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9760 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Houadria, Mickal Y. I.
Barone, Giulio
Fayle, Tom M.
Schmitt, Thomas
Konik, Petr
Feldhaar, Heike
An experimental, behavioral, and chemical analysis of food limitations in mutualistic Crematogaster ant symbionts inhabiting Macaranga host plants
title An experimental, behavioral, and chemical analysis of food limitations in mutualistic Crematogaster ant symbionts inhabiting Macaranga host plants
title_full An experimental, behavioral, and chemical analysis of food limitations in mutualistic Crematogaster ant symbionts inhabiting Macaranga host plants
title_fullStr An experimental, behavioral, and chemical analysis of food limitations in mutualistic Crematogaster ant symbionts inhabiting Macaranga host plants
title_full_unstemmed An experimental, behavioral, and chemical analysis of food limitations in mutualistic Crematogaster ant symbionts inhabiting Macaranga host plants
title_short An experimental, behavioral, and chemical analysis of food limitations in mutualistic Crematogaster ant symbionts inhabiting Macaranga host plants
title_sort experimental, behavioral, and chemical analysis of food limitations in mutualistic crematogaster ant symbionts inhabiting macaranga host plants
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9760
work_keys_str_mv AT houadriamickalyi anexperimentalbehavioralandchemicalanalysisoffoodlimitationsinmutualisticcrematogasterantsymbiontsinhabitingmacarangahostplants
AT baronegiulio anexperimentalbehavioralandchemicalanalysisoffoodlimitationsinmutualisticcrematogasterantsymbiontsinhabitingmacarangahostplants
AT fayletomm anexperimentalbehavioralandchemicalanalysisoffoodlimitationsinmutualisticcrematogasterantsymbiontsinhabitingmacarangahostplants
AT schmittthomas anexperimentalbehavioralandchemicalanalysisoffoodlimitationsinmutualisticcrematogasterantsymbiontsinhabitingmacarangahostplants
AT konikpetr anexperimentalbehavioralandchemicalanalysisoffoodlimitationsinmutualisticcrematogasterantsymbiontsinhabitingmacarangahostplants
AT feldhaarheike anexperimentalbehavioralandchemicalanalysisoffoodlimitationsinmutualisticcrematogasterantsymbiontsinhabitingmacarangahostplants
AT houadriamickalyi experimentalbehavioralandchemicalanalysisoffoodlimitationsinmutualisticcrematogasterantsymbiontsinhabitingmacarangahostplants
AT baronegiulio experimentalbehavioralandchemicalanalysisoffoodlimitationsinmutualisticcrematogasterantsymbiontsinhabitingmacarangahostplants
AT fayletomm experimentalbehavioralandchemicalanalysisoffoodlimitationsinmutualisticcrematogasterantsymbiontsinhabitingmacarangahostplants
AT schmittthomas experimentalbehavioralandchemicalanalysisoffoodlimitationsinmutualisticcrematogasterantsymbiontsinhabitingmacarangahostplants
AT konikpetr experimentalbehavioralandchemicalanalysisoffoodlimitationsinmutualisticcrematogasterantsymbiontsinhabitingmacarangahostplants
AT feldhaarheike experimentalbehavioralandchemicalanalysisoffoodlimitationsinmutualisticcrematogasterantsymbiontsinhabitingmacarangahostplants