Cargando…

Biophysical parameters control signal transfer in spiking network

INTRODUCTION: Information transmission and representation in both natural and artificial networks is dependent on connectivity between units. Biological neurons, in addition, modulate synaptic dynamics and post-synaptic membrane properties, but how these relate to information transmission in a popul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garnier Artiñano, Tomás, Andalibi, Vafa, Atula, Iiris, Maestri, Matteo, Vanni, Simo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36761840
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2023.1011814
_version_ 1784883866598637568
author Garnier Artiñano, Tomás
Andalibi, Vafa
Atula, Iiris
Maestri, Matteo
Vanni, Simo
author_facet Garnier Artiñano, Tomás
Andalibi, Vafa
Atula, Iiris
Maestri, Matteo
Vanni, Simo
author_sort Garnier Artiñano, Tomás
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Information transmission and representation in both natural and artificial networks is dependent on connectivity between units. Biological neurons, in addition, modulate synaptic dynamics and post-synaptic membrane properties, but how these relate to information transmission in a population of neurons is still poorly understood. A recent study investigated local learning rules and showed how a spiking neural network can learn to represent continuous signals. Our study builds on their model to explore how basic membrane properties and synaptic delays affect information transfer. METHODS: The system consisted of three input and output units and a hidden layer of 300 excitatory and 75 inhibitory leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) or adaptive integrate-and-fire (AdEx) units. After optimizing the connectivity to accurately replicate the input patterns in the output units, we transformed the model to more biologically accurate units and included synaptic delay and concurrent action potential generation in distinct neurons. We examined three different parameter regimes which comprised either identical physiological values for both excitatory and inhibitory units (Comrade), more biologically accurate values (Bacon), or the Comrade regime whose output units were optimized for low reconstruction error (HiFi). We evaluated information transmission and classification accuracy of the network with four distinct metrics: coherence, Granger causality, transfer entropy, and reconstruction error. RESULTS: Biophysical parameters showed a major impact on information transfer metrics. The classification was surprisingly robust, surviving very low firing and information rates, whereas information transmission overall and particularly low reconstruction error were more dependent on higher firing rates in LIF units. In AdEx units, the firing rates were lower and less information was transferred, but interestingly the highest information transmission rates were no longer overlapping with the highest firing rates. DISCUSSION: Our findings can be reflected on the predictive coding theory of the cerebral cortex and may suggest information transfer qualities as a phenomenological quality of biological cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9905747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99057472023-02-08 Biophysical parameters control signal transfer in spiking network Garnier Artiñano, Tomás Andalibi, Vafa Atula, Iiris Maestri, Matteo Vanni, Simo Front Comput Neurosci Computational Neuroscience INTRODUCTION: Information transmission and representation in both natural and artificial networks is dependent on connectivity between units. Biological neurons, in addition, modulate synaptic dynamics and post-synaptic membrane properties, but how these relate to information transmission in a population of neurons is still poorly understood. A recent study investigated local learning rules and showed how a spiking neural network can learn to represent continuous signals. Our study builds on their model to explore how basic membrane properties and synaptic delays affect information transfer. METHODS: The system consisted of three input and output units and a hidden layer of 300 excitatory and 75 inhibitory leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) or adaptive integrate-and-fire (AdEx) units. After optimizing the connectivity to accurately replicate the input patterns in the output units, we transformed the model to more biologically accurate units and included synaptic delay and concurrent action potential generation in distinct neurons. We examined three different parameter regimes which comprised either identical physiological values for both excitatory and inhibitory units (Comrade), more biologically accurate values (Bacon), or the Comrade regime whose output units were optimized for low reconstruction error (HiFi). We evaluated information transmission and classification accuracy of the network with four distinct metrics: coherence, Granger causality, transfer entropy, and reconstruction error. RESULTS: Biophysical parameters showed a major impact on information transfer metrics. The classification was surprisingly robust, surviving very low firing and information rates, whereas information transmission overall and particularly low reconstruction error were more dependent on higher firing rates in LIF units. In AdEx units, the firing rates were lower and less information was transferred, but interestingly the highest information transmission rates were no longer overlapping with the highest firing rates. DISCUSSION: Our findings can be reflected on the predictive coding theory of the cerebral cortex and may suggest information transfer qualities as a phenomenological quality of biological cells. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9905747/ /pubmed/36761840 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2023.1011814 Text en Copyright © 2023 Garnier Artiñano, Andalibi, Atula, Maestri and Vanni. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Computational Neuroscience
Garnier Artiñano, Tomás
Andalibi, Vafa
Atula, Iiris
Maestri, Matteo
Vanni, Simo
Biophysical parameters control signal transfer in spiking network
title Biophysical parameters control signal transfer in spiking network
title_full Biophysical parameters control signal transfer in spiking network
title_fullStr Biophysical parameters control signal transfer in spiking network
title_full_unstemmed Biophysical parameters control signal transfer in spiking network
title_short Biophysical parameters control signal transfer in spiking network
title_sort biophysical parameters control signal transfer in spiking network
topic Computational Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36761840
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2023.1011814
work_keys_str_mv AT garnierartinanotomas biophysicalparameterscontrolsignaltransferinspikingnetwork
AT andalibivafa biophysicalparameterscontrolsignaltransferinspikingnetwork
AT atulaiiris biophysicalparameterscontrolsignaltransferinspikingnetwork
AT maestrimatteo biophysicalparameterscontrolsignaltransferinspikingnetwork
AT vannisimo biophysicalparameterscontrolsignaltransferinspikingnetwork