Cargando…

Modified quantitative and volumetric response evaluation criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the cutoff value of quantitative and volumetric response evaluation criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and compare the performance of the modified criteria to one-dimensional criteria in su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Jiachen, Yin, Yu, Yang, Jun, Chen, Li, Li, Zhi, Shen, Jian, Wang, Wansheng, Ni, Caifang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36761945
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.957722
_version_ 1784883879344078848
author Xu, Jiachen
Yin, Yu
Yang, Jun
Chen, Li
Li, Zhi
Shen, Jian
Wang, Wansheng
Ni, Caifang
author_facet Xu, Jiachen
Yin, Yu
Yang, Jun
Chen, Li
Li, Zhi
Shen, Jian
Wang, Wansheng
Ni, Caifang
author_sort Xu, Jiachen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the cutoff value of quantitative and volumetric response evaluation criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and compare the performance of the modified criteria to one-dimensional criteria in survival prediction. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was performed for treatment-naive patients with HCC who underwent initial TACE between June 2015 and June 2019. Treatment response assessment was performed after the first observation by contrast CT or MRI, with the measurement of diameters by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and volumes by quantitative European Association for Study of the Liver (qEASL). Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint of this study. The new cutoff value for volumetric response evaluation criteria was created using restricted cubic splines. The performance of modified qEASL (mqEASL, with the new cutoff value) and mRECIST on survival prediction was compared by Cox regression models in internal and external validation. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients (mean age, 60 years ± 11 [standard deviation]; 111 men) were included and divided into training (n=90) and validation (n=39) cohorts. The cutoff value for the viable volume reduction was set at 57.0%. The mqEASL enabled separation of non-responders and responders in terms of median OS (p<0.001), 11.2 months (95% CI, 8.5–17.2 months) vs. 31.5 months (95% CI, 25.5–44.0 months). Two multivariate models were developed with independent prognostic factors (tumor response, metastasis, portal vein tumor thrombus, and subsequent treatment) to predict OS. Model 2 (for mqEASL) had a greater Harrel’s C index, higher time-dependent area under the receiving operator characteristic curve (AUROC), and more precise calibration on 6-month survival rates than Model 1 (for mRECIST). CONCLUSIONS: With the modified cutoff value, the quantitative and volumetric response of HCC patients to TACE becomes a precise predictor of overall survival. Further studies are needed to verify this modification before application in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9905806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99058062023-02-08 Modified quantitative and volumetric response evaluation criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization Xu, Jiachen Yin, Yu Yang, Jun Chen, Li Li, Zhi Shen, Jian Wang, Wansheng Ni, Caifang Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the cutoff value of quantitative and volumetric response evaluation criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and compare the performance of the modified criteria to one-dimensional criteria in survival prediction. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was performed for treatment-naive patients with HCC who underwent initial TACE between June 2015 and June 2019. Treatment response assessment was performed after the first observation by contrast CT or MRI, with the measurement of diameters by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and volumes by quantitative European Association for Study of the Liver (qEASL). Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint of this study. The new cutoff value for volumetric response evaluation criteria was created using restricted cubic splines. The performance of modified qEASL (mqEASL, with the new cutoff value) and mRECIST on survival prediction was compared by Cox regression models in internal and external validation. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients (mean age, 60 years ± 11 [standard deviation]; 111 men) were included and divided into training (n=90) and validation (n=39) cohorts. The cutoff value for the viable volume reduction was set at 57.0%. The mqEASL enabled separation of non-responders and responders in terms of median OS (p<0.001), 11.2 months (95% CI, 8.5–17.2 months) vs. 31.5 months (95% CI, 25.5–44.0 months). Two multivariate models were developed with independent prognostic factors (tumor response, metastasis, portal vein tumor thrombus, and subsequent treatment) to predict OS. Model 2 (for mqEASL) had a greater Harrel’s C index, higher time-dependent area under the receiving operator characteristic curve (AUROC), and more precise calibration on 6-month survival rates than Model 1 (for mRECIST). CONCLUSIONS: With the modified cutoff value, the quantitative and volumetric response of HCC patients to TACE becomes a precise predictor of overall survival. Further studies are needed to verify this modification before application in clinical practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9905806/ /pubmed/36761945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.957722 Text en Copyright © 2023 Xu, Yin, Yang, Chen, Li, Shen, Wang and Ni https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Xu, Jiachen
Yin, Yu
Yang, Jun
Chen, Li
Li, Zhi
Shen, Jian
Wang, Wansheng
Ni, Caifang
Modified quantitative and volumetric response evaluation criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization
title Modified quantitative and volumetric response evaluation criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization
title_full Modified quantitative and volumetric response evaluation criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization
title_fullStr Modified quantitative and volumetric response evaluation criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization
title_full_unstemmed Modified quantitative and volumetric response evaluation criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization
title_short Modified quantitative and volumetric response evaluation criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization
title_sort modified quantitative and volumetric response evaluation criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36761945
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.957722
work_keys_str_mv AT xujiachen modifiedquantitativeandvolumetricresponseevaluationcriteriaforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaaftertransarterialchemoembolization
AT yinyu modifiedquantitativeandvolumetricresponseevaluationcriteriaforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaaftertransarterialchemoembolization
AT yangjun modifiedquantitativeandvolumetricresponseevaluationcriteriaforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaaftertransarterialchemoembolization
AT chenli modifiedquantitativeandvolumetricresponseevaluationcriteriaforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaaftertransarterialchemoembolization
AT lizhi modifiedquantitativeandvolumetricresponseevaluationcriteriaforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaaftertransarterialchemoembolization
AT shenjian modifiedquantitativeandvolumetricresponseevaluationcriteriaforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaaftertransarterialchemoembolization
AT wangwansheng modifiedquantitativeandvolumetricresponseevaluationcriteriaforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaaftertransarterialchemoembolization
AT nicaifang modifiedquantitativeandvolumetricresponseevaluationcriteriaforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaaftertransarterialchemoembolization