Cargando…
Birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex
Animals interpret their environment by combining information from multiple senses. The relative usefulness of different senses may vary between species, habitats and sexes; yet, how multimodal stimuli are integrated and prioritized is unknown for most taxa. We experimentally assessed foraging prefer...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221336 |
_version_ | 1784883918847082496 |
---|---|
author | Rubene, Diana Low, Matthew Brodin, Anders |
author_facet | Rubene, Diana Low, Matthew Brodin, Anders |
author_sort | Rubene, Diana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Animals interpret their environment by combining information from multiple senses. The relative usefulness of different senses may vary between species, habitats and sexes; yet, how multimodal stimuli are integrated and prioritized is unknown for most taxa. We experimentally assessed foraging preferences of great tits (Parus major) to test whether urban and forest individuals prioritize visual and olfactory cues differently during foraging. We trained 13 wild-caught birds to associate multimodal (colour + odour) cues with a food reward and assessed their foraging preferences in a cue-separation test. In this, the birds could choose between the multimodal training cue and its olfactory or visual components. Our results suggest that the birds did not perceive multimodal cues in an integrated way, as their response was not stronger than for unimodal cue components. Urban birds preferred olfactory cues, while forest birds preferred visual cues. Nevertheless, female birds preferred the multimodal cue, while males foraged more randomly with respect to which cue was present. These findings contribute to our understanding of the relative roles of vision and olfaction in bird foraging behaviour. Future work should focus on how habitat- and sex-specific sensory prioritization modifies bird foraging behaviour and foraging success in the context of urban adaptations across populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9905992 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99059922023-02-09 Birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex Rubene, Diana Low, Matthew Brodin, Anders R Soc Open Sci Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Animals interpret their environment by combining information from multiple senses. The relative usefulness of different senses may vary between species, habitats and sexes; yet, how multimodal stimuli are integrated and prioritized is unknown for most taxa. We experimentally assessed foraging preferences of great tits (Parus major) to test whether urban and forest individuals prioritize visual and olfactory cues differently during foraging. We trained 13 wild-caught birds to associate multimodal (colour + odour) cues with a food reward and assessed their foraging preferences in a cue-separation test. In this, the birds could choose between the multimodal training cue and its olfactory or visual components. Our results suggest that the birds did not perceive multimodal cues in an integrated way, as their response was not stronger than for unimodal cue components. Urban birds preferred olfactory cues, while forest birds preferred visual cues. Nevertheless, female birds preferred the multimodal cue, while males foraged more randomly with respect to which cue was present. These findings contribute to our understanding of the relative roles of vision and olfaction in bird foraging behaviour. Future work should focus on how habitat- and sex-specific sensory prioritization modifies bird foraging behaviour and foraging success in the context of urban adaptations across populations. The Royal Society 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9905992/ /pubmed/36778952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221336 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Rubene, Diana Low, Matthew Brodin, Anders Birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex |
title | Birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex |
title_full | Birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex |
title_fullStr | Birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex |
title_full_unstemmed | Birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex |
title_short | Birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex |
title_sort | birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex |
topic | Organismal and Evolutionary Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221336 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rubenediana birdsdifferentiallyprioritizevisualandolfactoryforagingcuesdependingonhabitatoforiginandsex AT lowmatthew birdsdifferentiallyprioritizevisualandolfactoryforagingcuesdependingonhabitatoforiginandsex AT brodinanders birdsdifferentiallyprioritizevisualandolfactoryforagingcuesdependingonhabitatoforiginandsex |