Cargando…

Birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex

Animals interpret their environment by combining information from multiple senses. The relative usefulness of different senses may vary between species, habitats and sexes; yet, how multimodal stimuli are integrated and prioritized is unknown for most taxa. We experimentally assessed foraging prefer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rubene, Diana, Low, Matthew, Brodin, Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221336
_version_ 1784883918847082496
author Rubene, Diana
Low, Matthew
Brodin, Anders
author_facet Rubene, Diana
Low, Matthew
Brodin, Anders
author_sort Rubene, Diana
collection PubMed
description Animals interpret their environment by combining information from multiple senses. The relative usefulness of different senses may vary between species, habitats and sexes; yet, how multimodal stimuli are integrated and prioritized is unknown for most taxa. We experimentally assessed foraging preferences of great tits (Parus major) to test whether urban and forest individuals prioritize visual and olfactory cues differently during foraging. We trained 13 wild-caught birds to associate multimodal (colour + odour) cues with a food reward and assessed their foraging preferences in a cue-separation test. In this, the birds could choose between the multimodal training cue and its olfactory or visual components. Our results suggest that the birds did not perceive multimodal cues in an integrated way, as their response was not stronger than for unimodal cue components. Urban birds preferred olfactory cues, while forest birds preferred visual cues. Nevertheless, female birds preferred the multimodal cue, while males foraged more randomly with respect to which cue was present. These findings contribute to our understanding of the relative roles of vision and olfaction in bird foraging behaviour. Future work should focus on how habitat- and sex-specific sensory prioritization modifies bird foraging behaviour and foraging success in the context of urban adaptations across populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9905992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99059922023-02-09 Birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex Rubene, Diana Low, Matthew Brodin, Anders R Soc Open Sci Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Animals interpret their environment by combining information from multiple senses. The relative usefulness of different senses may vary between species, habitats and sexes; yet, how multimodal stimuli are integrated and prioritized is unknown for most taxa. We experimentally assessed foraging preferences of great tits (Parus major) to test whether urban and forest individuals prioritize visual and olfactory cues differently during foraging. We trained 13 wild-caught birds to associate multimodal (colour + odour) cues with a food reward and assessed their foraging preferences in a cue-separation test. In this, the birds could choose between the multimodal training cue and its olfactory or visual components. Our results suggest that the birds did not perceive multimodal cues in an integrated way, as their response was not stronger than for unimodal cue components. Urban birds preferred olfactory cues, while forest birds preferred visual cues. Nevertheless, female birds preferred the multimodal cue, while males foraged more randomly with respect to which cue was present. These findings contribute to our understanding of the relative roles of vision and olfaction in bird foraging behaviour. Future work should focus on how habitat- and sex-specific sensory prioritization modifies bird foraging behaviour and foraging success in the context of urban adaptations across populations. The Royal Society 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9905992/ /pubmed/36778952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221336 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Organismal and Evolutionary Biology
Rubene, Diana
Low, Matthew
Brodin, Anders
Birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex
title Birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex
title_full Birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex
title_fullStr Birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex
title_full_unstemmed Birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex
title_short Birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex
title_sort birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex
topic Organismal and Evolutionary Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221336
work_keys_str_mv AT rubenediana birdsdifferentiallyprioritizevisualandolfactoryforagingcuesdependingonhabitatoforiginandsex
AT lowmatthew birdsdifferentiallyprioritizevisualandolfactoryforagingcuesdependingonhabitatoforiginandsex
AT brodinanders birdsdifferentiallyprioritizevisualandolfactoryforagingcuesdependingonhabitatoforiginandsex