Cargando…

Automatic medication refills to improve glycaemic control among patients with diabetes and low medication adherence

BACKGROUND: Medication adherence impacts health outcomes. Healthcare organisations implementing system-level interventions have potential for greater spread and sustainability than individual-level interventions. Within the integrated US Veterans Health Administration, a multidisciplinary team devel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Golob, Anna L, Geyer, John, O'Keeffe, Chatty, Nelson, Kaylen, Song, Cassandra, Vanderwarker, Christopher, Britton, Jacqueline, Reddy, Ashok, Wong, Edwin, Schuttner, Linnaea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9906179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36746551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001985
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Medication adherence impacts health outcomes. Healthcare organisations implementing system-level interventions have potential for greater spread and sustainability than individual-level interventions. Within the integrated US Veterans Health Administration, a multidisciplinary team developed and evaluated a pilot quality improvement programme to assess the feasibility of automatic mailed prescription refills for patients with diabetes and low medication adherence (assessed by medication possession ratio <80%). METHODS: Patients were randomised to usual care with self-initiated refills versus automatic mailed refills for 6 months. Process outcomes included glycaemic control measures (HgbA1C), medication possession ratios for both automatic and self-initiated (reference) refills of medications, patient satisfaction and workforce effort (pharmacist time). RESULTS: Overall, 199 patients were randomised to automatic refills (n=99; 40 of whom participated) versus usual care (n=100). In multivariable analysis adjusting for baseline differences, after 6 months there was no difference in the proportion of patients with follow-up HgbA1C <8% (60.8% automatic refills vs 60.5% usual care, p=0.96). In the automatic refill group, the medication possession ratio for reference medicines was significantly higher than usual care (63.9% vs 54.5%, 95% CI (for difference) 3.1% to 15.9%, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Implications and lessons from this pilot programme include potential beneficial indirect effects from automatic medication refills on patient self-initiated refills of other medications; the importance of tailoring solutions to patient subgroups and specific adherence barriers; and recognition that the rapid deployment, iteration and evaluation of the project was facilitated by a multidisciplinary team embedded within an organisational learning health system.