Cargando…
Randomised pragmatic waitlist trial with process evaluation investigating the effectiveness of peer support after brain injury: protocol
INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important global health problem. Formal service provision fails to address the ongoing needs of people with TBI and their family in the context of a social and relational process of learning to live with and adapt to life after TBI. Our feasibility st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9906261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36750279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069167 |
_version_ | 1784883962654490624 |
---|---|
author | Kayes, Nicola Cummins, Christine Weatherall, Mark Smith, Greta Te Ao, Braden Elder, Hinemoa Fadyl, Joanna Kirstin Howard-Brown, Christine Foster, Allison Kersten, Paula |
author_facet | Kayes, Nicola Cummins, Christine Weatherall, Mark Smith, Greta Te Ao, Braden Elder, Hinemoa Fadyl, Joanna Kirstin Howard-Brown, Christine Foster, Allison Kersten, Paula |
author_sort | Kayes, Nicola |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important global health problem. Formal service provision fails to address the ongoing needs of people with TBI and their family in the context of a social and relational process of learning to live with and adapt to life after TBI. Our feasibility study reported peer support after TBI is acceptable to both mentors and mentees with reported benefits indicating a high potential for effectiveness and likelihood of improving outcomes for both mentees and their mentors. OBJECTIVES: To (a) test the effectiveness of a peer support intervention for improving participation, health and well-being outcomes after TBI and (b) determine key process variables relating to intervention, context and implementation to underpin an evidence-based framework for ongoing service provision. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised pragmatic waitlist trial with process evaluation. Mentee participants (n=46) will be included if they have moderate or severe TBI and are no more than 18 months post-injury. Mentor participants (n=18) will be people with TBI up to 6 years after injury, who were discharged from inpatient rehabilitation at least 1 year prior. The primary outcome will be mentee participation, measured using the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire after 22 weeks. Primary analysis of the continuous variables will be analysis of covariance with baseline measurement as a covariate and randomised treatment as the main explanatory predictor variable at 22 weeks. Process evaluation will include analysis of intervention-related data and qualitative data collected from mentors and service coordinators. Data synthesis will inform the development of a service framework for future implementation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from the New Zealand Health and Disability Ethics Committee (19/NTB/82) and Auckland University of Technology Ethics Committee (19/345). Dissemination of findings will be via traditional academic routes including publication in internationally recognised peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12619001002178. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9906261 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99062612023-02-08 Randomised pragmatic waitlist trial with process evaluation investigating the effectiveness of peer support after brain injury: protocol Kayes, Nicola Cummins, Christine Weatherall, Mark Smith, Greta Te Ao, Braden Elder, Hinemoa Fadyl, Joanna Kirstin Howard-Brown, Christine Foster, Allison Kersten, Paula BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important global health problem. Formal service provision fails to address the ongoing needs of people with TBI and their family in the context of a social and relational process of learning to live with and adapt to life after TBI. Our feasibility study reported peer support after TBI is acceptable to both mentors and mentees with reported benefits indicating a high potential for effectiveness and likelihood of improving outcomes for both mentees and their mentors. OBJECTIVES: To (a) test the effectiveness of a peer support intervention for improving participation, health and well-being outcomes after TBI and (b) determine key process variables relating to intervention, context and implementation to underpin an evidence-based framework for ongoing service provision. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised pragmatic waitlist trial with process evaluation. Mentee participants (n=46) will be included if they have moderate or severe TBI and are no more than 18 months post-injury. Mentor participants (n=18) will be people with TBI up to 6 years after injury, who were discharged from inpatient rehabilitation at least 1 year prior. The primary outcome will be mentee participation, measured using the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire after 22 weeks. Primary analysis of the continuous variables will be analysis of covariance with baseline measurement as a covariate and randomised treatment as the main explanatory predictor variable at 22 weeks. Process evaluation will include analysis of intervention-related data and qualitative data collected from mentors and service coordinators. Data synthesis will inform the development of a service framework for future implementation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from the New Zealand Health and Disability Ethics Committee (19/NTB/82) and Auckland University of Technology Ethics Committee (19/345). Dissemination of findings will be via traditional academic routes including publication in internationally recognised peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12619001002178. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9906261/ /pubmed/36750279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069167 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine Kayes, Nicola Cummins, Christine Weatherall, Mark Smith, Greta Te Ao, Braden Elder, Hinemoa Fadyl, Joanna Kirstin Howard-Brown, Christine Foster, Allison Kersten, Paula Randomised pragmatic waitlist trial with process evaluation investigating the effectiveness of peer support after brain injury: protocol |
title | Randomised pragmatic waitlist trial with process evaluation investigating the effectiveness of peer support after brain injury: protocol |
title_full | Randomised pragmatic waitlist trial with process evaluation investigating the effectiveness of peer support after brain injury: protocol |
title_fullStr | Randomised pragmatic waitlist trial with process evaluation investigating the effectiveness of peer support after brain injury: protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomised pragmatic waitlist trial with process evaluation investigating the effectiveness of peer support after brain injury: protocol |
title_short | Randomised pragmatic waitlist trial with process evaluation investigating the effectiveness of peer support after brain injury: protocol |
title_sort | randomised pragmatic waitlist trial with process evaluation investigating the effectiveness of peer support after brain injury: protocol |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9906261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36750279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069167 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kayesnicola randomisedpragmaticwaitlisttrialwithprocessevaluationinvestigatingtheeffectivenessofpeersupportafterbraininjuryprotocol AT cumminschristine randomisedpragmaticwaitlisttrialwithprocessevaluationinvestigatingtheeffectivenessofpeersupportafterbraininjuryprotocol AT weatherallmark randomisedpragmaticwaitlisttrialwithprocessevaluationinvestigatingtheeffectivenessofpeersupportafterbraininjuryprotocol AT smithgreta randomisedpragmaticwaitlisttrialwithprocessevaluationinvestigatingtheeffectivenessofpeersupportafterbraininjuryprotocol AT teaobraden randomisedpragmaticwaitlisttrialwithprocessevaluationinvestigatingtheeffectivenessofpeersupportafterbraininjuryprotocol AT elderhinemoa randomisedpragmaticwaitlisttrialwithprocessevaluationinvestigatingtheeffectivenessofpeersupportafterbraininjuryprotocol AT fadyljoannakirstin randomisedpragmaticwaitlisttrialwithprocessevaluationinvestigatingtheeffectivenessofpeersupportafterbraininjuryprotocol AT howardbrownchristine randomisedpragmaticwaitlisttrialwithprocessevaluationinvestigatingtheeffectivenessofpeersupportafterbraininjuryprotocol AT fosterallison randomisedpragmaticwaitlisttrialwithprocessevaluationinvestigatingtheeffectivenessofpeersupportafterbraininjuryprotocol AT kerstenpaula randomisedpragmaticwaitlisttrialwithprocessevaluationinvestigatingtheeffectivenessofpeersupportafterbraininjuryprotocol |