Cargando…

Project20: maternity care mechanisms that improve access and engagement for women with social risk factors in the UK – a mixed-methods, realist evaluation

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate how women access and engage with different models of maternity care, whether specialist models improve access and engagement for women with social risk factors, and if so, how? DESIGN: Realist evaluation. SETTING: Two UK maternity service providers. PARTICIPANTS: Women access...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rayment-Jones, Hannah, Dalrymple, Kathryn, Harris, James M, Harden, Angela, Parslow, Elidh, Georgi, Thomas, Sandall, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9906302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36750277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064291
_version_ 1784883968389152768
author Rayment-Jones, Hannah
Dalrymple, Kathryn
Harris, James M
Harden, Angela
Parslow, Elidh
Georgi, Thomas
Sandall, Jane
author_facet Rayment-Jones, Hannah
Dalrymple, Kathryn
Harris, James M
Harden, Angela
Parslow, Elidh
Georgi, Thomas
Sandall, Jane
author_sort Rayment-Jones, Hannah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate how women access and engage with different models of maternity care, whether specialist models improve access and engagement for women with social risk factors, and if so, how? DESIGN: Realist evaluation. SETTING: Two UK maternity service providers. PARTICIPANTS: Women accessing maternity services in 2019 (n=1020). METHODS: Prospective observational cohort with multinomial regression analysis to compare measures of access and engagement between models and place of antenatal care. Realist informed, longitudinal interviews with women accessing specialist models of care were analysed to identify mechanisms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measures of access and engagement, healthcare-seeking experiences. RESULTS: The number of social risk factors women were experiencing increased with deprivation score, with the most deprived more likely to receive a specialist model that provided continuity of care. Women attending hospital-based antenatal care were more likely to access maternity care late (risk ratio (RR) 2.51, 95% CI 1.33 to 4.70), less likely to have the recommended number of antenatal appointments (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.99) and more likely to have over 15 appointments (RR 4.90, 95% CI 2.50 to 9.61) compared with community-based care. Women accessing standard care (RR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.11) and black women (RR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.11) were less likely to have appointments with a known healthcare professional compared with the specialist model. Qualitative data revealed mechanisms for improved access and engagement including self-referral, relational continuity with a small team of midwives, flexibility and situating services within deprived community settings. CONCLUSION: Inequalities in access and engagement with maternity care appears to have been mitigated by the community-based specialist model that provided continuity of care. The findings enabled the refinement of a realist programme theory to inform those developing maternity services in line with current policy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9906302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99063022023-02-08 Project20: maternity care mechanisms that improve access and engagement for women with social risk factors in the UK – a mixed-methods, realist evaluation Rayment-Jones, Hannah Dalrymple, Kathryn Harris, James M Harden, Angela Parslow, Elidh Georgi, Thomas Sandall, Jane BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To evaluate how women access and engage with different models of maternity care, whether specialist models improve access and engagement for women with social risk factors, and if so, how? DESIGN: Realist evaluation. SETTING: Two UK maternity service providers. PARTICIPANTS: Women accessing maternity services in 2019 (n=1020). METHODS: Prospective observational cohort with multinomial regression analysis to compare measures of access and engagement between models and place of antenatal care. Realist informed, longitudinal interviews with women accessing specialist models of care were analysed to identify mechanisms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measures of access and engagement, healthcare-seeking experiences. RESULTS: The number of social risk factors women were experiencing increased with deprivation score, with the most deprived more likely to receive a specialist model that provided continuity of care. Women attending hospital-based antenatal care were more likely to access maternity care late (risk ratio (RR) 2.51, 95% CI 1.33 to 4.70), less likely to have the recommended number of antenatal appointments (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.99) and more likely to have over 15 appointments (RR 4.90, 95% CI 2.50 to 9.61) compared with community-based care. Women accessing standard care (RR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.11) and black women (RR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.11) were less likely to have appointments with a known healthcare professional compared with the specialist model. Qualitative data revealed mechanisms for improved access and engagement including self-referral, relational continuity with a small team of midwives, flexibility and situating services within deprived community settings. CONCLUSION: Inequalities in access and engagement with maternity care appears to have been mitigated by the community-based specialist model that provided continuity of care. The findings enabled the refinement of a realist programme theory to inform those developing maternity services in line with current policy. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9906302/ /pubmed/36750277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064291 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Rayment-Jones, Hannah
Dalrymple, Kathryn
Harris, James M
Harden, Angela
Parslow, Elidh
Georgi, Thomas
Sandall, Jane
Project20: maternity care mechanisms that improve access and engagement for women with social risk factors in the UK – a mixed-methods, realist evaluation
title Project20: maternity care mechanisms that improve access and engagement for women with social risk factors in the UK – a mixed-methods, realist evaluation
title_full Project20: maternity care mechanisms that improve access and engagement for women with social risk factors in the UK – a mixed-methods, realist evaluation
title_fullStr Project20: maternity care mechanisms that improve access and engagement for women with social risk factors in the UK – a mixed-methods, realist evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Project20: maternity care mechanisms that improve access and engagement for women with social risk factors in the UK – a mixed-methods, realist evaluation
title_short Project20: maternity care mechanisms that improve access and engagement for women with social risk factors in the UK – a mixed-methods, realist evaluation
title_sort project20: maternity care mechanisms that improve access and engagement for women with social risk factors in the uk – a mixed-methods, realist evaluation
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9906302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36750277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064291
work_keys_str_mv AT raymentjoneshannah project20maternitycaremechanismsthatimproveaccessandengagementforwomenwithsocialriskfactorsintheukamixedmethodsrealistevaluation
AT dalrymplekathryn project20maternitycaremechanismsthatimproveaccessandengagementforwomenwithsocialriskfactorsintheukamixedmethodsrealistevaluation
AT harrisjamesm project20maternitycaremechanismsthatimproveaccessandengagementforwomenwithsocialriskfactorsintheukamixedmethodsrealistevaluation
AT hardenangela project20maternitycaremechanismsthatimproveaccessandengagementforwomenwithsocialriskfactorsintheukamixedmethodsrealistevaluation
AT parslowelidh project20maternitycaremechanismsthatimproveaccessandengagementforwomenwithsocialriskfactorsintheukamixedmethodsrealistevaluation
AT georgithomas project20maternitycaremechanismsthatimproveaccessandengagementforwomenwithsocialriskfactorsintheukamixedmethodsrealistevaluation
AT sandalljane project20maternitycaremechanismsthatimproveaccessandengagementforwomenwithsocialriskfactorsintheukamixedmethodsrealistevaluation