Cargando…

Outcome of preoperative cefazolin use for infection prophylaxis in patients with self-reported penicillin allergy

BACKGROUND: Cephalosporins are the preferred antibiotics for prophylaxis against surgical site infections. Most studies give a rate of combined IgE and non-IgE penicillin allergy yet it is recommended that cephalosporins be avoided in patients having the former but can be used in those with the latt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michaud, Laura, Yen, Hope H., Engen, Dale A., Yen, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9906882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36755308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-01931-w
_version_ 1784884060068249600
author Michaud, Laura
Yen, Hope H.
Engen, Dale A.
Yen, David
author_facet Michaud, Laura
Yen, Hope H.
Engen, Dale A.
Yen, David
author_sort Michaud, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cephalosporins are the preferred antibiotics for prophylaxis against surgical site infections. Most studies give a rate of combined IgE and non-IgE penicillin allergy yet it is recommended that cephalosporins be avoided in patients having the former but can be used in those with the latter. Some studies use penicillin allergy while others penicillin family allergy rates. The primary goal of this study was to determine the rates of IgE and non-IgE allergy as well as cross reactions to both penicillin and the penicillin family. Secondary goals were to determine the surgical services giving preoperative cefazolin and the types of self reported reactions that patients’ had to penicillin prompting their allergy status. METHODS: All patients undergoing elective and emergency surgery at a University Health Sciences Centre were retrospectively studied. The hospital electronic medical record was used for data collection. RESULTS: 8.9% of our patients reported non-IgE reactions to penicillin with a cross reactivity rate of 0.9% with cefazolin. 4.0% of our patients reported IgE reactions to penicillin with a cross reactivity rate of 4.0% with cefazolin. 10.5% of our patients reported non-IgE reactions to the penicillin family with a cross reactivity rate of 0.8% with cefazolin. 4.3% of our patients reported IgE reactions to the penicillin family with a cross reactivity rate of 4.0% with cefazolin. CONCLUSIONS: Our rate of combined IgE and non-IgE reactions for both penicillin and penicillin family allergy was within the range reported in the literature. Our rate of cross reactivity between cefazolin and combined IgE and non-IgE allergy both to penicillin and the penicillin family were lower than reported in the old literature but within the range of the newer literature. We found a lower rate of allergic reaction to a cephalosporin than reported in the literature. We documented a wide range of IgE and non-IgE reactions. We also demonstrated that cefazolin is frequently the preferred antibiotics for prophylaxis against surgical site infections by many surgical services and that de-labelling patients with penicillin allergy is unnecessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9906882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99068822023-02-08 Outcome of preoperative cefazolin use for infection prophylaxis in patients with self-reported penicillin allergy Michaud, Laura Yen, Hope H. Engen, Dale A. Yen, David BMC Surg Research BACKGROUND: Cephalosporins are the preferred antibiotics for prophylaxis against surgical site infections. Most studies give a rate of combined IgE and non-IgE penicillin allergy yet it is recommended that cephalosporins be avoided in patients having the former but can be used in those with the latter. Some studies use penicillin allergy while others penicillin family allergy rates. The primary goal of this study was to determine the rates of IgE and non-IgE allergy as well as cross reactions to both penicillin and the penicillin family. Secondary goals were to determine the surgical services giving preoperative cefazolin and the types of self reported reactions that patients’ had to penicillin prompting their allergy status. METHODS: All patients undergoing elective and emergency surgery at a University Health Sciences Centre were retrospectively studied. The hospital electronic medical record was used for data collection. RESULTS: 8.9% of our patients reported non-IgE reactions to penicillin with a cross reactivity rate of 0.9% with cefazolin. 4.0% of our patients reported IgE reactions to penicillin with a cross reactivity rate of 4.0% with cefazolin. 10.5% of our patients reported non-IgE reactions to the penicillin family with a cross reactivity rate of 0.8% with cefazolin. 4.3% of our patients reported IgE reactions to the penicillin family with a cross reactivity rate of 4.0% with cefazolin. CONCLUSIONS: Our rate of combined IgE and non-IgE reactions for both penicillin and penicillin family allergy was within the range reported in the literature. Our rate of cross reactivity between cefazolin and combined IgE and non-IgE allergy both to penicillin and the penicillin family were lower than reported in the old literature but within the range of the newer literature. We found a lower rate of allergic reaction to a cephalosporin than reported in the literature. We documented a wide range of IgE and non-IgE reactions. We also demonstrated that cefazolin is frequently the preferred antibiotics for prophylaxis against surgical site infections by many surgical services and that de-labelling patients with penicillin allergy is unnecessary. BioMed Central 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9906882/ /pubmed/36755308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-01931-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Michaud, Laura
Yen, Hope H.
Engen, Dale A.
Yen, David
Outcome of preoperative cefazolin use for infection prophylaxis in patients with self-reported penicillin allergy
title Outcome of preoperative cefazolin use for infection prophylaxis in patients with self-reported penicillin allergy
title_full Outcome of preoperative cefazolin use for infection prophylaxis in patients with self-reported penicillin allergy
title_fullStr Outcome of preoperative cefazolin use for infection prophylaxis in patients with self-reported penicillin allergy
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of preoperative cefazolin use for infection prophylaxis in patients with self-reported penicillin allergy
title_short Outcome of preoperative cefazolin use for infection prophylaxis in patients with self-reported penicillin allergy
title_sort outcome of preoperative cefazolin use for infection prophylaxis in patients with self-reported penicillin allergy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9906882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36755308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-01931-w
work_keys_str_mv AT michaudlaura outcomeofpreoperativecefazolinuseforinfectionprophylaxisinpatientswithselfreportedpenicillinallergy
AT yenhopeh outcomeofpreoperativecefazolinuseforinfectionprophylaxisinpatientswithselfreportedpenicillinallergy
AT engendalea outcomeofpreoperativecefazolinuseforinfectionprophylaxisinpatientswithselfreportedpenicillinallergy
AT yendavid outcomeofpreoperativecefazolinuseforinfectionprophylaxisinpatientswithselfreportedpenicillinallergy