Cargando…

E pluribus unum: prospective acceptability benchmarking from the Contouring Collaborative for Consensus in Radiation Oncology crowdsourced initiative for multiobserver segmentation

PURPOSE: Contouring Collaborative for Consensus in Radiation Oncology (C3RO) is a crowdsourced challenge engaging radiation oncologists across various expertise levels in segmentation. An obstacle to artificial intelligence (AI) development is the paucity of multiexpert datasets; consequently, we so...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Diana, Wahid, Kareem A., Nelms, Benjamin E., He, Renjie, Naser, Mohammed A., Duke, Simon, Sherer, Michael V., Christodouleas, John P., Mohamed, Abdallah S. R., Cislo, Michael, Murphy, James D., Fuller, Clifton D., Gillespie, Erin F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36761036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.10.S1.S11903
_version_ 1784884086731440128
author Lin, Diana
Wahid, Kareem A.
Nelms, Benjamin E.
He, Renjie
Naser, Mohammed A.
Duke, Simon
Sherer, Michael V.
Christodouleas, John P.
Mohamed, Abdallah S. R.
Cislo, Michael
Murphy, James D.
Fuller, Clifton D.
Gillespie, Erin F.
author_facet Lin, Diana
Wahid, Kareem A.
Nelms, Benjamin E.
He, Renjie
Naser, Mohammed A.
Duke, Simon
Sherer, Michael V.
Christodouleas, John P.
Mohamed, Abdallah S. R.
Cislo, Michael
Murphy, James D.
Fuller, Clifton D.
Gillespie, Erin F.
author_sort Lin, Diana
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Contouring Collaborative for Consensus in Radiation Oncology (C3RO) is a crowdsourced challenge engaging radiation oncologists across various expertise levels in segmentation. An obstacle to artificial intelligence (AI) development is the paucity of multiexpert datasets; consequently, we sought to characterize whether aggregate segmentations generated from multiple nonexperts could meet or exceed recognized expert agreement. APPROACH: Participants who contoured [Formula: see text] region of interest (ROI) for the breast, sarcoma, head and neck (H&N), gynecologic (GYN), or gastrointestinal (GI) cases were identified as a nonexpert or recognized expert. Cohort-specific ROIs were combined into single simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) consensus segmentations. [Formula: see text] ROIs were evaluated against [Formula: see text] contours using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The expert interobserver DSC ([Formula: see text]) was calculated as an acceptability threshold between [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. To determine the number of nonexperts required to match the [Formula: see text] for each ROI, a single consensus contour was generated using variable numbers of nonexperts and then compared to the [Formula: see text]. RESULTS: For all cases, the DSC values for [Formula: see text] versus [Formula: see text] were higher than comparator expert [Formula: see text] for most ROIs. The minimum number of nonexpert segmentations needed for a consensus ROI to achieve [Formula: see text] acceptability criteria ranged between 2 and 4 for breast, 3 and 5 for sarcoma, 3 and 5 for H&N, 3 and 5 for GYN, and 3 for GI. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple nonexpert-generated consensus ROIs met or exceeded expert-derived acceptability thresholds. Five nonexperts could potentially generate consensus segmentations for most ROIs with performance approximating experts, suggesting nonexpert segmentations as feasible cost-effective AI inputs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9907021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99070212023-02-08 E pluribus unum: prospective acceptability benchmarking from the Contouring Collaborative for Consensus in Radiation Oncology crowdsourced initiative for multiobserver segmentation Lin, Diana Wahid, Kareem A. Nelms, Benjamin E. He, Renjie Naser, Mohammed A. Duke, Simon Sherer, Michael V. Christodouleas, John P. Mohamed, Abdallah S. R. Cislo, Michael Murphy, James D. Fuller, Clifton D. Gillespie, Erin F. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Special Issue on Medical Image Perception and Observer Performance PURPOSE: Contouring Collaborative for Consensus in Radiation Oncology (C3RO) is a crowdsourced challenge engaging radiation oncologists across various expertise levels in segmentation. An obstacle to artificial intelligence (AI) development is the paucity of multiexpert datasets; consequently, we sought to characterize whether aggregate segmentations generated from multiple nonexperts could meet or exceed recognized expert agreement. APPROACH: Participants who contoured [Formula: see text] region of interest (ROI) for the breast, sarcoma, head and neck (H&N), gynecologic (GYN), or gastrointestinal (GI) cases were identified as a nonexpert or recognized expert. Cohort-specific ROIs were combined into single simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) consensus segmentations. [Formula: see text] ROIs were evaluated against [Formula: see text] contours using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The expert interobserver DSC ([Formula: see text]) was calculated as an acceptability threshold between [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. To determine the number of nonexperts required to match the [Formula: see text] for each ROI, a single consensus contour was generated using variable numbers of nonexperts and then compared to the [Formula: see text]. RESULTS: For all cases, the DSC values for [Formula: see text] versus [Formula: see text] were higher than comparator expert [Formula: see text] for most ROIs. The minimum number of nonexpert segmentations needed for a consensus ROI to achieve [Formula: see text] acceptability criteria ranged between 2 and 4 for breast, 3 and 5 for sarcoma, 3 and 5 for H&N, 3 and 5 for GYN, and 3 for GI. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple nonexpert-generated consensus ROIs met or exceeded expert-derived acceptability thresholds. Five nonexperts could potentially generate consensus segmentations for most ROIs with performance approximating experts, suggesting nonexpert segmentations as feasible cost-effective AI inputs. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2023-02-08 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9907021/ /pubmed/36761036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.10.S1.S11903 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
spellingShingle Special Issue on Medical Image Perception and Observer Performance
Lin, Diana
Wahid, Kareem A.
Nelms, Benjamin E.
He, Renjie
Naser, Mohammed A.
Duke, Simon
Sherer, Michael V.
Christodouleas, John P.
Mohamed, Abdallah S. R.
Cislo, Michael
Murphy, James D.
Fuller, Clifton D.
Gillespie, Erin F.
E pluribus unum: prospective acceptability benchmarking from the Contouring Collaborative for Consensus in Radiation Oncology crowdsourced initiative for multiobserver segmentation
title E pluribus unum: prospective acceptability benchmarking from the Contouring Collaborative for Consensus in Radiation Oncology crowdsourced initiative for multiobserver segmentation
title_full E pluribus unum: prospective acceptability benchmarking from the Contouring Collaborative for Consensus in Radiation Oncology crowdsourced initiative for multiobserver segmentation
title_fullStr E pluribus unum: prospective acceptability benchmarking from the Contouring Collaborative for Consensus in Radiation Oncology crowdsourced initiative for multiobserver segmentation
title_full_unstemmed E pluribus unum: prospective acceptability benchmarking from the Contouring Collaborative for Consensus in Radiation Oncology crowdsourced initiative for multiobserver segmentation
title_short E pluribus unum: prospective acceptability benchmarking from the Contouring Collaborative for Consensus in Radiation Oncology crowdsourced initiative for multiobserver segmentation
title_sort e pluribus unum: prospective acceptability benchmarking from the contouring collaborative for consensus in radiation oncology crowdsourced initiative for multiobserver segmentation
topic Special Issue on Medical Image Perception and Observer Performance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36761036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.10.S1.S11903
work_keys_str_mv AT lindiana epluribusunumprospectiveacceptabilitybenchmarkingfromthecontouringcollaborativeforconsensusinradiationoncologycrowdsourcedinitiativeformultiobserversegmentation
AT wahidkareema epluribusunumprospectiveacceptabilitybenchmarkingfromthecontouringcollaborativeforconsensusinradiationoncologycrowdsourcedinitiativeformultiobserversegmentation
AT nelmsbenjamine epluribusunumprospectiveacceptabilitybenchmarkingfromthecontouringcollaborativeforconsensusinradiationoncologycrowdsourcedinitiativeformultiobserversegmentation
AT herenjie epluribusunumprospectiveacceptabilitybenchmarkingfromthecontouringcollaborativeforconsensusinradiationoncologycrowdsourcedinitiativeformultiobserversegmentation
AT nasermohammeda epluribusunumprospectiveacceptabilitybenchmarkingfromthecontouringcollaborativeforconsensusinradiationoncologycrowdsourcedinitiativeformultiobserversegmentation
AT dukesimon epluribusunumprospectiveacceptabilitybenchmarkingfromthecontouringcollaborativeforconsensusinradiationoncologycrowdsourcedinitiativeformultiobserversegmentation
AT sherermichaelv epluribusunumprospectiveacceptabilitybenchmarkingfromthecontouringcollaborativeforconsensusinradiationoncologycrowdsourcedinitiativeformultiobserversegmentation
AT christodouleasjohnp epluribusunumprospectiveacceptabilitybenchmarkingfromthecontouringcollaborativeforconsensusinradiationoncologycrowdsourcedinitiativeformultiobserversegmentation
AT mohamedabdallahsr epluribusunumprospectiveacceptabilitybenchmarkingfromthecontouringcollaborativeforconsensusinradiationoncologycrowdsourcedinitiativeformultiobserversegmentation
AT cislomichael epluribusunumprospectiveacceptabilitybenchmarkingfromthecontouringcollaborativeforconsensusinradiationoncologycrowdsourcedinitiativeformultiobserversegmentation
AT murphyjamesd epluribusunumprospectiveacceptabilitybenchmarkingfromthecontouringcollaborativeforconsensusinradiationoncologycrowdsourcedinitiativeformultiobserversegmentation
AT fullercliftond epluribusunumprospectiveacceptabilitybenchmarkingfromthecontouringcollaborativeforconsensusinradiationoncologycrowdsourcedinitiativeformultiobserversegmentation
AT gillespieerinf epluribusunumprospectiveacceptabilitybenchmarkingfromthecontouringcollaborativeforconsensusinradiationoncologycrowdsourcedinitiativeformultiobserversegmentation