Cargando…

Two changes that may help to improve NIH peer review

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Aslin, Richard N.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	National Academy of Sciences 2022
Materias:	Opinion
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36512493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2214028119

Ejemplares similares

Is the NIH policy for sharing GWAS data running the risk of being counterproductive?
por: Krawczak, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores
por: Lindner, Mark D., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Prejudice, Interests, Jealousy: Inappropriate Peer Reviewers May Be Exacerbating Inequality in Academic Publication in Health Research
por: Hu, Xiaojing
Publicado: (2023)

Sample Size and Precision in NIH Peer Review
por: Kaplan, David, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials
por: Patel, Jigisha
Publicado: (2014)

NIH Peer Review: Scored Review Criteria and Overall Impact
por: Lindner, Mark D., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF NIH PEER REVIEW: THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW
por: Femia, Elia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills
por: Rivera, Horacio, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Correction: Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores
Publicado: (2015)

Double Anonymity and the Peer Review Process
por: Brown, Richard J.C.
Publicado: (2006)

On the pitfalls of peer review
por: van Gunsteren, Wilfred
Publicado: (2015)

DEMYSTIFYING NIH PEER REVIEW: YOUR APPLICATION FROM SUBMISSION TO SCORE
por: Ortenberg, Elia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity
por: Fang, Ferric C, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Publishing peer review materials
por: Beck, Jeffrey, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Optiscope® may have less stimulation on hemodynamic changes
por: In, Junyong, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Peer review practicalities in clinical medicine
por: Metcalfe, Matthew J, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Ten considerations for open peer review
por: Schmidt, Birgit, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Activation of DNA Damage Tolerance Pathways May Improve Immunotherapy of Mesothelioma
por: Brossel, Hélène, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

NIH peer review: Criterion scores completely account for racial disparities in overall impact scores
por: Erosheva, Elena A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Biotechnology can help us save the genetic heritage of salmon and other aquatic species
por: Fedoroff, Nina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS): The Repeated Bout Effect and Chemotherapy-Induced Axonopathy May Help Explain the Dying-Back Mechanism in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Other Neurodegenerative Diseases
por: Sonkodi, Balázs
Publicado: (2021)

Restoring public trust in science with the help of the humanities
por: Couée, Ivan
Publicado: (2020)

Can microbiology help to make aviation more sustainable?
por: Segura, Ana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Navigating the NIH Public Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Manuscripts - Why and How to get a PMCID Number
por: Liston, Robin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices
por: Conix, Stijn, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Change the Laminin, Change the Cardiomyocyte: Improve Untreatable Heart Failure
por: Hochman-Mendez, Camila, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

What ails the NIH peer review study sections and how to fix the review process of the grant applications
por: Marian, Ali J.
Publicado: (2023)

New Paradigms to Help Solve the Global Aquaculture Disease Crisis
por: Stentiford, Grant D., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Vexed causal inferences in nutritional epidemiology—call for genetic help
por: Ohukainen, Pauli, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Should I Help? Prosocial Behaviour during the COVID-19 Pandemic
por: Wider, Walton, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Presumptive treatment of fever cases as malaria: help or hindrance for malaria control?
por: Gosling, Roly D, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Mirror, mirror on the wall: which microbiomes will help heal them all?
por: Nayak, Renuka R., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

How to help Ukrainian scientists overcome Russia’s invasion and advance sustainability
por: Sotnik, Garry, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Teaching and learning based on peer review: a realistic approach in forensic sciences
por: Dinis-Oliveira, Ricardo Jorge, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

An Analysis of Preliminary and Post-Discussion Priority Scores for Grant Applications Peer Reviewed by the Center for Scientific Review at the NIH
por: Martin, Michael R., et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Brain-Related Research as a Support Mechanism to Help Learners to Acquire Full Literacy
por: Lyytinen, Heikki, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Retraction of a peer reviewed article suggests ongoing problems with Australian forensic science
por: Brook, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

How the Glasgow Declaration on Forests can help keep alive the 1.5 °C target
por: Gasser, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Peer review practices in academic medicine: how the example of orthopaedic surgery may help shift the paradigm?
por: Chloros, George D., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Will an electronic nose help at high altitude?
por: Vinnikov, Denis, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_l20eoeddhr1o4bnsgvlrncsig6