Cargando…

Updated concepts of seismic gaps and asperities to assess great earthquake hazard along South America

So far in this century, six very large–magnitude earthquakes (M(W) ≥ 7.8) have ruptured separate portions of the subduction zone plate boundary of western South America along Ecuador, Peru, and Chile. Each source region had last experienced a very large earthquake from 74 to 261 y earlier. This hist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lay, Thorne, Nishenko, Stuart P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36512498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2216843119
_version_ 1784884104914796544
author Lay, Thorne
Nishenko, Stuart P.
author_facet Lay, Thorne
Nishenko, Stuart P.
author_sort Lay, Thorne
collection PubMed
description So far in this century, six very large–magnitude earthquakes (M(W) ≥ 7.8) have ruptured separate portions of the subduction zone plate boundary of western South America along Ecuador, Peru, and Chile. Each source region had last experienced a very large earthquake from 74 to 261 y earlier. This history led to their designation in advance as seismic gaps with potential to host future large earthquakes. Deployments of geodetic and seismic monitoring instruments in several of the seismic gaps enhanced resolution of the subsequent faulting processes, revealing preevent patterns of geodetic slip deficit accumulation and heterogeneous coseismic slip on the megathrust fault. Localized regions of large slip, or asperities, appear to have influenced variability in how each source region ruptured relative to prior events, as repeated ruptures have had similar, but not identical slip distributions. We consider updated perspectives of seismic gaps, asperities, and geodetic locking to assess current very large earthquake hazard along the South American subduction zone, noting regions of particular concern in northern Ecuador and Colombia (1958/1906 rupture zone), southeastern Peru (southeasternmost 1868 rupture zone), north Chile (1877 rupture zone), and north-central Chile (1922 rupture zone) that have large geodetic slip deficit measurements and long intervals (from 64 to 154 y) since prior large events have struck those regions. Expanded geophysical measurements onshore and offshore in these seismic gaps may provide critical information about the strain cycle and fault stress buildup late in the seismic cycle in advance of the future great earthquakes that will eventually strike each region.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9907104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99071042023-02-08 Updated concepts of seismic gaps and asperities to assess great earthquake hazard along South America Lay, Thorne Nishenko, Stuart P. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Physical Sciences So far in this century, six very large–magnitude earthquakes (M(W) ≥ 7.8) have ruptured separate portions of the subduction zone plate boundary of western South America along Ecuador, Peru, and Chile. Each source region had last experienced a very large earthquake from 74 to 261 y earlier. This history led to their designation in advance as seismic gaps with potential to host future large earthquakes. Deployments of geodetic and seismic monitoring instruments in several of the seismic gaps enhanced resolution of the subsequent faulting processes, revealing preevent patterns of geodetic slip deficit accumulation and heterogeneous coseismic slip on the megathrust fault. Localized regions of large slip, or asperities, appear to have influenced variability in how each source region ruptured relative to prior events, as repeated ruptures have had similar, but not identical slip distributions. We consider updated perspectives of seismic gaps, asperities, and geodetic locking to assess current very large earthquake hazard along the South American subduction zone, noting regions of particular concern in northern Ecuador and Colombia (1958/1906 rupture zone), southeastern Peru (southeasternmost 1868 rupture zone), north Chile (1877 rupture zone), and north-central Chile (1922 rupture zone) that have large geodetic slip deficit measurements and long intervals (from 64 to 154 y) since prior large events have struck those regions. Expanded geophysical measurements onshore and offshore in these seismic gaps may provide critical information about the strain cycle and fault stress buildup late in the seismic cycle in advance of the future great earthquakes that will eventually strike each region. National Academy of Sciences 2022-12-13 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9907104/ /pubmed/36512498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2216843119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Physical Sciences
Lay, Thorne
Nishenko, Stuart P.
Updated concepts of seismic gaps and asperities to assess great earthquake hazard along South America
title Updated concepts of seismic gaps and asperities to assess great earthquake hazard along South America
title_full Updated concepts of seismic gaps and asperities to assess great earthquake hazard along South America
title_fullStr Updated concepts of seismic gaps and asperities to assess great earthquake hazard along South America
title_full_unstemmed Updated concepts of seismic gaps and asperities to assess great earthquake hazard along South America
title_short Updated concepts of seismic gaps and asperities to assess great earthquake hazard along South America
title_sort updated concepts of seismic gaps and asperities to assess great earthquake hazard along south america
topic Physical Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36512498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2216843119
work_keys_str_mv AT laythorne updatedconceptsofseismicgapsandasperitiestoassessgreatearthquakehazardalongsouthamerica
AT nishenkostuartp updatedconceptsofseismicgapsandasperitiestoassessgreatearthquakehazardalongsouthamerica