Cargando…

Computational platform for doctor–artificial intelligence cooperation in pulmonary arterial hypertension prognostication: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a heterogeneous and complex pulmonary vascular disease associated with substantial morbidity. Machine-learning algorithms (used in many PAH risk calculators) can combine established parameters with thousands of circulating biomarkers to optimise P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kheyfets, Vitaly O., Sweatt, Andrew J., Gomberg-Maitland, Mardi, Ivy, Dunbar D., Condliffe, Robin, Kiely, David G., Lawrie, Allan, Maron, Bradley A., Zamanian, Roham T., Stenmark, Kurt R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00484-2022
_version_ 1784884115618660352
author Kheyfets, Vitaly O.
Sweatt, Andrew J.
Gomberg-Maitland, Mardi
Ivy, Dunbar D.
Condliffe, Robin
Kiely, David G.
Lawrie, Allan
Maron, Bradley A.
Zamanian, Roham T.
Stenmark, Kurt R.
author_facet Kheyfets, Vitaly O.
Sweatt, Andrew J.
Gomberg-Maitland, Mardi
Ivy, Dunbar D.
Condliffe, Robin
Kiely, David G.
Lawrie, Allan
Maron, Bradley A.
Zamanian, Roham T.
Stenmark, Kurt R.
author_sort Kheyfets, Vitaly O.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a heterogeneous and complex pulmonary vascular disease associated with substantial morbidity. Machine-learning algorithms (used in many PAH risk calculators) can combine established parameters with thousands of circulating biomarkers to optimise PAH prognostication, but these approaches do not offer the clinician insight into what parameters drove the prognosis. The approach proposed in this study diverges from other contemporary phenotyping methods by identifying patient-specific parameters driving clinical risk. METHODS: We trained a random forest algorithm to predict 4-year survival risk in a cohort of 167 adult PAH patients evaluated at Stanford University, with 20% withheld for (internal) validation. Another cohort of 38 patients from Sheffield University were used as a secondary (external) validation. Shapley values, borrowed from game theory, were computed to rank the input parameters based on their importance to the predicted risk score for the entire trained random forest model (global importance) and for an individual patient (local importance). RESULTS: Between the internal and external validation cohorts, the random forest model predicted 4-year risk of death/transplant with sensitivity and specificity of 71.0–100% and 81.0–89.0%, respectively. The model reinforced the importance of established prognostic markers, but also identified novel inflammatory biomarkers that predict risk in some PAH patients. CONCLUSION: These results stress the need for advancing individualised phenotyping strategies that integrate clinical and biochemical data with outcome. The computational platform presented in this study offers a critical step towards personalised medicine in which a clinician can interpret an algorithm's assessment of an individual patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9907150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99071502023-02-09 Computational platform for doctor–artificial intelligence cooperation in pulmonary arterial hypertension prognostication: a pilot study Kheyfets, Vitaly O. Sweatt, Andrew J. Gomberg-Maitland, Mardi Ivy, Dunbar D. Condliffe, Robin Kiely, David G. Lawrie, Allan Maron, Bradley A. Zamanian, Roham T. Stenmark, Kurt R. ERJ Open Res Original Research Articles BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a heterogeneous and complex pulmonary vascular disease associated with substantial morbidity. Machine-learning algorithms (used in many PAH risk calculators) can combine established parameters with thousands of circulating biomarkers to optimise PAH prognostication, but these approaches do not offer the clinician insight into what parameters drove the prognosis. The approach proposed in this study diverges from other contemporary phenotyping methods by identifying patient-specific parameters driving clinical risk. METHODS: We trained a random forest algorithm to predict 4-year survival risk in a cohort of 167 adult PAH patients evaluated at Stanford University, with 20% withheld for (internal) validation. Another cohort of 38 patients from Sheffield University were used as a secondary (external) validation. Shapley values, borrowed from game theory, were computed to rank the input parameters based on their importance to the predicted risk score for the entire trained random forest model (global importance) and for an individual patient (local importance). RESULTS: Between the internal and external validation cohorts, the random forest model predicted 4-year risk of death/transplant with sensitivity and specificity of 71.0–100% and 81.0–89.0%, respectively. The model reinforced the importance of established prognostic markers, but also identified novel inflammatory biomarkers that predict risk in some PAH patients. CONCLUSION: These results stress the need for advancing individualised phenotyping strategies that integrate clinical and biochemical data with outcome. The computational platform presented in this study offers a critical step towards personalised medicine in which a clinician can interpret an algorithm's assessment of an individual patient. European Respiratory Society 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9907150/ /pubmed/36776484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00484-2022 Text en Copyright ©The authors 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org (mailto:permissions@ersnet.org)
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Kheyfets, Vitaly O.
Sweatt, Andrew J.
Gomberg-Maitland, Mardi
Ivy, Dunbar D.
Condliffe, Robin
Kiely, David G.
Lawrie, Allan
Maron, Bradley A.
Zamanian, Roham T.
Stenmark, Kurt R.
Computational platform for doctor–artificial intelligence cooperation in pulmonary arterial hypertension prognostication: a pilot study
title Computational platform for doctor–artificial intelligence cooperation in pulmonary arterial hypertension prognostication: a pilot study
title_full Computational platform for doctor–artificial intelligence cooperation in pulmonary arterial hypertension prognostication: a pilot study
title_fullStr Computational platform for doctor–artificial intelligence cooperation in pulmonary arterial hypertension prognostication: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Computational platform for doctor–artificial intelligence cooperation in pulmonary arterial hypertension prognostication: a pilot study
title_short Computational platform for doctor–artificial intelligence cooperation in pulmonary arterial hypertension prognostication: a pilot study
title_sort computational platform for doctor–artificial intelligence cooperation in pulmonary arterial hypertension prognostication: a pilot study
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00484-2022
work_keys_str_mv AT kheyfetsvitalyo computationalplatformfordoctorartificialintelligencecooperationinpulmonaryarterialhypertensionprognosticationapilotstudy
AT sweattandrewj computationalplatformfordoctorartificialintelligencecooperationinpulmonaryarterialhypertensionprognosticationapilotstudy
AT gombergmaitlandmardi computationalplatformfordoctorartificialintelligencecooperationinpulmonaryarterialhypertensionprognosticationapilotstudy
AT ivydunbard computationalplatformfordoctorartificialintelligencecooperationinpulmonaryarterialhypertensionprognosticationapilotstudy
AT condlifferobin computationalplatformfordoctorartificialintelligencecooperationinpulmonaryarterialhypertensionprognosticationapilotstudy
AT kielydavidg computationalplatformfordoctorartificialintelligencecooperationinpulmonaryarterialhypertensionprognosticationapilotstudy
AT lawrieallan computationalplatformfordoctorartificialintelligencecooperationinpulmonaryarterialhypertensionprognosticationapilotstudy
AT maronbradleya computationalplatformfordoctorartificialintelligencecooperationinpulmonaryarterialhypertensionprognosticationapilotstudy
AT zamanianrohamt computationalplatformfordoctorartificialintelligencecooperationinpulmonaryarterialhypertensionprognosticationapilotstudy
AT stenmarkkurtr computationalplatformfordoctorartificialintelligencecooperationinpulmonaryarterialhypertensionprognosticationapilotstudy