Cargando…
Principles into Practice: An Observational Study of Physiotherapists use of Motor Learning Principles in Stroke Rehabilitation
OBJECTIVE(S): To describe a) how motor learning principles are applied during post stroke physiotherapy, with a focus on lower limb rehabilitation; and b) the context in which these principles are used, in relation to patient and/or task characteristics. DESIGN: Direct non-participation observation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Chartered Society of Physiotherapy London
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36306569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2022.06.002 |
_version_ | 1784884132071866368 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Louise Burridge, Jane Ewings, Sean Westcott, Ellie Gayton, Marianne Demain, Sara |
author_facet | Johnson, Louise Burridge, Jane Ewings, Sean Westcott, Ellie Gayton, Marianne Demain, Sara |
author_sort | Johnson, Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE(S): To describe a) how motor learning principles are applied during post stroke physiotherapy, with a focus on lower limb rehabilitation; and b) the context in which these principles are used, in relation to patient and/or task characteristics. DESIGN: Direct non-participation observation of routine physiotherapy sessions, with data collected via video recording. A structured analysis matrix and pre-agreed definitions were used to identify, count and record: type of activity; repetitions; instructional and feedback statements (frequency and type); strategies such as observational learning and augmented feedback. Data was visualised using scatter plots, and analysed descriptively. SETTING: 6 UK Stroke Units PARTICIPANTS: 89 therapy sessions were observed, involving 55 clinicians and 57 patients. RESULTS: Proportion of time spent active within each session ranged from 26% to 98% (mean 85, SD 19). The frequency of task repetition varied widely, with a median of 3.7 repetitions per minute (IQR 2.1–8.6). Coaching statements were common (mean 6.46 per minute), with 52% categorised as instructions, 14% as feedback, and 34% as verbal cues/motivational statements. 13% of instructions and 6% of feedback statements were externally focussed. Examining the use of different coaching behaviours in relation to patient characteristics found no associations. Overall, practice varied widely across the dataset. CONCLUSIONS: To optimise the potential for motor skill learning, therapists must manipulate features of their coaching language (what they say, how much and when) and practice design (type, number, difficulty and variability of task). There is an opportunity to implement motor learning principles more consistently, to benefit motor skill recovery following stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03792126). CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER: • The findings from this study highlight opportunities for therapists to consider how they use verbal instructions and feedback in a specific and precise way, in order to support the process of motor learning. There is scope within routine clinical practice to use the many and varied types of feedback more robustly. • This study provides insight into how therapists apply motor learning principles stroke rehabilitation settings, and potential associations with a range of patient characteristics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9907222 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Chartered Society of Physiotherapy London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99072222023-03-01 Principles into Practice: An Observational Study of Physiotherapists use of Motor Learning Principles in Stroke Rehabilitation Johnson, Louise Burridge, Jane Ewings, Sean Westcott, Ellie Gayton, Marianne Demain, Sara Physiotherapy Article OBJECTIVE(S): To describe a) how motor learning principles are applied during post stroke physiotherapy, with a focus on lower limb rehabilitation; and b) the context in which these principles are used, in relation to patient and/or task characteristics. DESIGN: Direct non-participation observation of routine physiotherapy sessions, with data collected via video recording. A structured analysis matrix and pre-agreed definitions were used to identify, count and record: type of activity; repetitions; instructional and feedback statements (frequency and type); strategies such as observational learning and augmented feedback. Data was visualised using scatter plots, and analysed descriptively. SETTING: 6 UK Stroke Units PARTICIPANTS: 89 therapy sessions were observed, involving 55 clinicians and 57 patients. RESULTS: Proportion of time spent active within each session ranged from 26% to 98% (mean 85, SD 19). The frequency of task repetition varied widely, with a median of 3.7 repetitions per minute (IQR 2.1–8.6). Coaching statements were common (mean 6.46 per minute), with 52% categorised as instructions, 14% as feedback, and 34% as verbal cues/motivational statements. 13% of instructions and 6% of feedback statements were externally focussed. Examining the use of different coaching behaviours in relation to patient characteristics found no associations. Overall, practice varied widely across the dataset. CONCLUSIONS: To optimise the potential for motor skill learning, therapists must manipulate features of their coaching language (what they say, how much and when) and practice design (type, number, difficulty and variability of task). There is an opportunity to implement motor learning principles more consistently, to benefit motor skill recovery following stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03792126). CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER: • The findings from this study highlight opportunities for therapists to consider how they use verbal instructions and feedback in a specific and precise way, in order to support the process of motor learning. There is scope within routine clinical practice to use the many and varied types of feedback more robustly. • This study provides insight into how therapists apply motor learning principles stroke rehabilitation settings, and potential associations with a range of patient characteristics. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy London 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9907222/ /pubmed/36306569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2022.06.002 Text en Crown Copyright © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Johnson, Louise Burridge, Jane Ewings, Sean Westcott, Ellie Gayton, Marianne Demain, Sara Principles into Practice: An Observational Study of Physiotherapists use of Motor Learning Principles in Stroke Rehabilitation |
title | Principles into Practice: An Observational Study of Physiotherapists use of Motor Learning Principles in Stroke Rehabilitation |
title_full | Principles into Practice: An Observational Study of Physiotherapists use of Motor Learning Principles in Stroke Rehabilitation |
title_fullStr | Principles into Practice: An Observational Study of Physiotherapists use of Motor Learning Principles in Stroke Rehabilitation |
title_full_unstemmed | Principles into Practice: An Observational Study of Physiotherapists use of Motor Learning Principles in Stroke Rehabilitation |
title_short | Principles into Practice: An Observational Study of Physiotherapists use of Motor Learning Principles in Stroke Rehabilitation |
title_sort | principles into practice: an observational study of physiotherapists use of motor learning principles in stroke rehabilitation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36306569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2022.06.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonlouise principlesintopracticeanobservationalstudyofphysiotherapistsuseofmotorlearningprinciplesinstrokerehabilitation AT burridgejane principlesintopracticeanobservationalstudyofphysiotherapistsuseofmotorlearningprinciplesinstrokerehabilitation AT ewingssean principlesintopracticeanobservationalstudyofphysiotherapistsuseofmotorlearningprinciplesinstrokerehabilitation AT westcottellie principlesintopracticeanobservationalstudyofphysiotherapistsuseofmotorlearningprinciplesinstrokerehabilitation AT gaytonmarianne principlesintopracticeanobservationalstudyofphysiotherapistsuseofmotorlearningprinciplesinstrokerehabilitation AT demainsara principlesintopracticeanobservationalstudyofphysiotherapistsuseofmotorlearningprinciplesinstrokerehabilitation |