Cargando…
Assessment of a high-fidelity, virtual reality-based, manual small-incision cataract surgery simulator: A face and content validity study
PURPOSE: To establish the face and content validity of the HelpMeSee Eye Surgery Simulator – a virtual reality-based cataract surgery simulator for manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS). METHODS: The face and content validity were assessed on the sclero-corneal tunnel construction course. A...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36308146 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1593_22 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: To establish the face and content validity of the HelpMeSee Eye Surgery Simulator – a virtual reality-based cataract surgery simulator for manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS). METHODS: The face and content validity were assessed on the sclero-corneal tunnel construction course. A questionnaire with 11 questions focused on the visual realism, with resemblance to real life surgery, and the training value of the simulator was developed. Thirty-five experienced MSICS surgeons participated in the study. Responses were recorded using a seven-point scoring system. RESULTS: Overall, 74.3% (26/35) of the respondents agreed that the overall visual representation of the eye and the instruments in the simulator were realistic. The task of injecting a visco-elastic through the paracentesis was reported to be the most visually realistic task with a mean score of 5.78 (SD: 1.09; range: 2–7). With regard to content validity, 77.1% (27/35) of the subjects felt agreed that the errors and complications represented throughout the entire tunnel construction module were similar to those encountered in real life; the task of entering the anterior chamber with the keratome had a mean score of 5.54 (SD: 0.98; range 1–7), being rated the highest in that aspect. Overall, 94.3% (33/35) of the subjects agreed that the simulator would be useful in developing hand–eye co-ordination. A similar number of 94.3% (33/35) agreed that based on their experience, they would recommend cataract surgical training on this simulator. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the HelpMeSee Eye Surgery Simulator appears to have sufficient face and content validity for cataract surgical training. |
---|