Cargando…

Mobile health vs. standard care after cardiac surgery: results of The Box 2.0 study

AIMS: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication of cardiac surgery, yet difficult to detect in ambulatory patients. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the effect of a mobile health (mHealth) intervention on POAF detection after cardiac surgery. METHODS AND RESULT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biersteker, Tom E, Boogers, Mark J, Schalij, Martin Jan, Penning de Vries, Bas B L, Groenwold, Rolf H H, van Alem, Anouk P, de Weger, Arend, van Hof, Nicolette, Treskes, Roderick W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35951658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac115
_version_ 1784884180971159552
author Biersteker, Tom E
Boogers, Mark J
Schalij, Martin Jan
Penning de Vries, Bas B L
Groenwold, Rolf H H
van Alem, Anouk P
de Weger, Arend
van Hof, Nicolette
Treskes, Roderick W
author_facet Biersteker, Tom E
Boogers, Mark J
Schalij, Martin Jan
Penning de Vries, Bas B L
Groenwold, Rolf H H
van Alem, Anouk P
de Weger, Arend
van Hof, Nicolette
Treskes, Roderick W
author_sort Biersteker, Tom E
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication of cardiac surgery, yet difficult to detect in ambulatory patients. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the effect of a mobile health (mHealth) intervention on POAF detection after cardiac surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed an observational cohort study among 730 adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery at a tertiary care hospital in The Netherlands. Of these patients, 365 patients received standard care and were included as a historical control group, undergoing surgery between December 2017 and September 2018, and 365 patients were prospectively included from November 2018 and November 2020, undergoing an mHealth intervention which consisted of blood pressure, temperature, weight, and electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring. One physical outpatient follow-up moment was replaced by an electronic visit. All patients were requested to fill out a satisfaction and quality of life questionnaire. Mean age in the intervention group was 62 years, 275 (70.4%) patients were males. A total of 4136 12-lead ECGs were registered. In the intervention group, 61 (16.7%) patients were diagnosed with POAF vs. 25 (6.8%) patients in the control group [adjusted risk ratio (RR) of POAF detection: 2.15; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.55–3.97]. De novo atrial fibrillation was found in 13 patients using mHealth (6.5%) vs. 4 control group patients (1.8%; adjusted RR 3.94, 95% CI: 1.50–11.27). CONCLUSION: Scheduled self-measurements with mHealth devices could increase the probability of detecting POAF within 3 months after cardiac surgery. The effect of an increase in POAF detection on clinical outcomes needs to be addressed in future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9907478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99074782023-02-09 Mobile health vs. standard care after cardiac surgery: results of The Box 2.0 study Biersteker, Tom E Boogers, Mark J Schalij, Martin Jan Penning de Vries, Bas B L Groenwold, Rolf H H van Alem, Anouk P de Weger, Arend van Hof, Nicolette Treskes, Roderick W Europace Clinical Research AIMS: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication of cardiac surgery, yet difficult to detect in ambulatory patients. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the effect of a mobile health (mHealth) intervention on POAF detection after cardiac surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed an observational cohort study among 730 adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery at a tertiary care hospital in The Netherlands. Of these patients, 365 patients received standard care and were included as a historical control group, undergoing surgery between December 2017 and September 2018, and 365 patients were prospectively included from November 2018 and November 2020, undergoing an mHealth intervention which consisted of blood pressure, temperature, weight, and electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring. One physical outpatient follow-up moment was replaced by an electronic visit. All patients were requested to fill out a satisfaction and quality of life questionnaire. Mean age in the intervention group was 62 years, 275 (70.4%) patients were males. A total of 4136 12-lead ECGs were registered. In the intervention group, 61 (16.7%) patients were diagnosed with POAF vs. 25 (6.8%) patients in the control group [adjusted risk ratio (RR) of POAF detection: 2.15; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.55–3.97]. De novo atrial fibrillation was found in 13 patients using mHealth (6.5%) vs. 4 control group patients (1.8%; adjusted RR 3.94, 95% CI: 1.50–11.27). CONCLUSION: Scheduled self-measurements with mHealth devices could increase the probability of detecting POAF within 3 months after cardiac surgery. The effect of an increase in POAF detection on clinical outcomes needs to be addressed in future research. Oxford University Press 2022-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9907478/ /pubmed/35951658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac115 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Biersteker, Tom E
Boogers, Mark J
Schalij, Martin Jan
Penning de Vries, Bas B L
Groenwold, Rolf H H
van Alem, Anouk P
de Weger, Arend
van Hof, Nicolette
Treskes, Roderick W
Mobile health vs. standard care after cardiac surgery: results of The Box 2.0 study
title Mobile health vs. standard care after cardiac surgery: results of The Box 2.0 study
title_full Mobile health vs. standard care after cardiac surgery: results of The Box 2.0 study
title_fullStr Mobile health vs. standard care after cardiac surgery: results of The Box 2.0 study
title_full_unstemmed Mobile health vs. standard care after cardiac surgery: results of The Box 2.0 study
title_short Mobile health vs. standard care after cardiac surgery: results of The Box 2.0 study
title_sort mobile health vs. standard care after cardiac surgery: results of the box 2.0 study
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35951658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac115
work_keys_str_mv AT bierstekertome mobilehealthvsstandardcareaftercardiacsurgeryresultsofthebox20study
AT boogersmarkj mobilehealthvsstandardcareaftercardiacsurgeryresultsofthebox20study
AT schalijmartinjan mobilehealthvsstandardcareaftercardiacsurgeryresultsofthebox20study
AT penningdevriesbasbl mobilehealthvsstandardcareaftercardiacsurgeryresultsofthebox20study
AT groenwoldrolfhh mobilehealthvsstandardcareaftercardiacsurgeryresultsofthebox20study
AT vanalemanoukp mobilehealthvsstandardcareaftercardiacsurgeryresultsofthebox20study
AT dewegerarend mobilehealthvsstandardcareaftercardiacsurgeryresultsofthebox20study
AT vanhofnicolette mobilehealthvsstandardcareaftercardiacsurgeryresultsofthebox20study
AT treskesroderickw mobilehealthvsstandardcareaftercardiacsurgeryresultsofthebox20study