Cargando…

Use of General Practitioner Telehealth Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Regional Victoria, Australia: Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND: In March 2020, the Australian Government expanded general practitioner (GP) telehealth services in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess use patterns of GP telehealth services in response to changing circumstances (before and during the COVID-19 pandem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Savira, Feby, Orellana, Liliana, Hensher, Martin, Gao, Lan, Sanigorski, Andrew, Mc Namara, Kevin, Versace, Vincent L, Szakiel, John, Swann, Jamie, Manias, Elizabeth, Peeters, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36649230
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39384
_version_ 1784884196182851584
author Savira, Feby
Orellana, Liliana
Hensher, Martin
Gao, Lan
Sanigorski, Andrew
Mc Namara, Kevin
Versace, Vincent L
Szakiel, John
Swann, Jamie
Manias, Elizabeth
Peeters, Anna
author_facet Savira, Feby
Orellana, Liliana
Hensher, Martin
Gao, Lan
Sanigorski, Andrew
Mc Namara, Kevin
Versace, Vincent L
Szakiel, John
Swann, Jamie
Manias, Elizabeth
Peeters, Anna
author_sort Savira, Feby
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In March 2020, the Australian Government expanded general practitioner (GP) telehealth services in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess use patterns of GP telehealth services in response to changing circumstances (before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and with or without a lockdown) in regional Victoria, Australia. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of monthly Medicare claims data from July 2019 to June 2021 from 140 regional GP practices in Western Victoria. The longitudinal patterns of proportion of GP telehealth consultations stratified by type of consultation (ie, videoconference vs telephone) and by geographical, consumer, and consultation characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: Telehealth comprised 25.8% (522,932/2,025,615) of GP consultations over the 2-year period. After the introduction of the Australian telehealth expansion policy in March 2020, there was a rapid uptake in GP telehealth services (including telephone and video services), from 0% before COVID-19 to 15% (11,854/80,922) of all consultations in March 2020, peaking at 55% (50,828/92,139) in August 2020. Thereafter, the use of telehealth declined steadily to 31% (23,941/77,344) in January 2021 and tapered off to 28% (29,263/103,798) in June 2021. Telephone services and shorter consultations were the most dominant form, and those aged 15-64 years had higher telehealth use rates than younger or older age groups. The proportion of video consultations was higher during periods with government-imposed lockdowns and higher in the most socioeconomically advantaged areas compared to less socioeconomically advantaged areas. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the continuation of telehealth use in rural and regional Australia post pandemic. Future policy must identify mechanisms to reduce existing equity gaps in video consultations and consider patient- and system-level implications of the dominant use of short telephone consultations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9907565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99075652023-02-08 Use of General Practitioner Telehealth Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Regional Victoria, Australia: Retrospective Analysis Savira, Feby Orellana, Liliana Hensher, Martin Gao, Lan Sanigorski, Andrew Mc Namara, Kevin Versace, Vincent L Szakiel, John Swann, Jamie Manias, Elizabeth Peeters, Anna J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: In March 2020, the Australian Government expanded general practitioner (GP) telehealth services in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess use patterns of GP telehealth services in response to changing circumstances (before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and with or without a lockdown) in regional Victoria, Australia. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of monthly Medicare claims data from July 2019 to June 2021 from 140 regional GP practices in Western Victoria. The longitudinal patterns of proportion of GP telehealth consultations stratified by type of consultation (ie, videoconference vs telephone) and by geographical, consumer, and consultation characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: Telehealth comprised 25.8% (522,932/2,025,615) of GP consultations over the 2-year period. After the introduction of the Australian telehealth expansion policy in March 2020, there was a rapid uptake in GP telehealth services (including telephone and video services), from 0% before COVID-19 to 15% (11,854/80,922) of all consultations in March 2020, peaking at 55% (50,828/92,139) in August 2020. Thereafter, the use of telehealth declined steadily to 31% (23,941/77,344) in January 2021 and tapered off to 28% (29,263/103,798) in June 2021. Telephone services and shorter consultations were the most dominant form, and those aged 15-64 years had higher telehealth use rates than younger or older age groups. The proportion of video consultations was higher during periods with government-imposed lockdowns and higher in the most socioeconomically advantaged areas compared to less socioeconomically advantaged areas. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the continuation of telehealth use in rural and regional Australia post pandemic. Future policy must identify mechanisms to reduce existing equity gaps in video consultations and consider patient- and system-level implications of the dominant use of short telephone consultations. JMIR Publications 2023-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9907565/ /pubmed/36649230 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39384 Text en ©Feby Savira, Liliana Orellana, Martin Hensher, Lan Gao, Andrew Sanigorski, Kevin Mc Namara, Vincent L Versace, John Szakiel, Jamie Swann, Elizabeth Manias, Anna Peeters. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 07.02.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Savira, Feby
Orellana, Liliana
Hensher, Martin
Gao, Lan
Sanigorski, Andrew
Mc Namara, Kevin
Versace, Vincent L
Szakiel, John
Swann, Jamie
Manias, Elizabeth
Peeters, Anna
Use of General Practitioner Telehealth Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Regional Victoria, Australia: Retrospective Analysis
title Use of General Practitioner Telehealth Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Regional Victoria, Australia: Retrospective Analysis
title_full Use of General Practitioner Telehealth Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Regional Victoria, Australia: Retrospective Analysis
title_fullStr Use of General Practitioner Telehealth Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Regional Victoria, Australia: Retrospective Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Use of General Practitioner Telehealth Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Regional Victoria, Australia: Retrospective Analysis
title_short Use of General Practitioner Telehealth Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Regional Victoria, Australia: Retrospective Analysis
title_sort use of general practitioner telehealth services during the covid-19 pandemic in regional victoria, australia: retrospective analysis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36649230
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39384
work_keys_str_mv AT savirafeby useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis
AT orellanaliliana useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis
AT henshermartin useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis
AT gaolan useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis
AT sanigorskiandrew useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis
AT mcnamarakevin useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis
AT versacevincentl useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis
AT szakieljohn useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis
AT swannjamie useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis
AT maniaselizabeth useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis
AT peetersanna useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis