Cargando…
Use of General Practitioner Telehealth Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Regional Victoria, Australia: Retrospective Analysis
BACKGROUND: In March 2020, the Australian Government expanded general practitioner (GP) telehealth services in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess use patterns of GP telehealth services in response to changing circumstances (before and during the COVID-19 pandem...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36649230 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39384 |
_version_ | 1784884196182851584 |
---|---|
author | Savira, Feby Orellana, Liliana Hensher, Martin Gao, Lan Sanigorski, Andrew Mc Namara, Kevin Versace, Vincent L Szakiel, John Swann, Jamie Manias, Elizabeth Peeters, Anna |
author_facet | Savira, Feby Orellana, Liliana Hensher, Martin Gao, Lan Sanigorski, Andrew Mc Namara, Kevin Versace, Vincent L Szakiel, John Swann, Jamie Manias, Elizabeth Peeters, Anna |
author_sort | Savira, Feby |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In March 2020, the Australian Government expanded general practitioner (GP) telehealth services in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess use patterns of GP telehealth services in response to changing circumstances (before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and with or without a lockdown) in regional Victoria, Australia. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of monthly Medicare claims data from July 2019 to June 2021 from 140 regional GP practices in Western Victoria. The longitudinal patterns of proportion of GP telehealth consultations stratified by type of consultation (ie, videoconference vs telephone) and by geographical, consumer, and consultation characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: Telehealth comprised 25.8% (522,932/2,025,615) of GP consultations over the 2-year period. After the introduction of the Australian telehealth expansion policy in March 2020, there was a rapid uptake in GP telehealth services (including telephone and video services), from 0% before COVID-19 to 15% (11,854/80,922) of all consultations in March 2020, peaking at 55% (50,828/92,139) in August 2020. Thereafter, the use of telehealth declined steadily to 31% (23,941/77,344) in January 2021 and tapered off to 28% (29,263/103,798) in June 2021. Telephone services and shorter consultations were the most dominant form, and those aged 15-64 years had higher telehealth use rates than younger or older age groups. The proportion of video consultations was higher during periods with government-imposed lockdowns and higher in the most socioeconomically advantaged areas compared to less socioeconomically advantaged areas. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the continuation of telehealth use in rural and regional Australia post pandemic. Future policy must identify mechanisms to reduce existing equity gaps in video consultations and consider patient- and system-level implications of the dominant use of short telephone consultations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9907565 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99075652023-02-08 Use of General Practitioner Telehealth Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Regional Victoria, Australia: Retrospective Analysis Savira, Feby Orellana, Liliana Hensher, Martin Gao, Lan Sanigorski, Andrew Mc Namara, Kevin Versace, Vincent L Szakiel, John Swann, Jamie Manias, Elizabeth Peeters, Anna J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: In March 2020, the Australian Government expanded general practitioner (GP) telehealth services in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess use patterns of GP telehealth services in response to changing circumstances (before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and with or without a lockdown) in regional Victoria, Australia. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of monthly Medicare claims data from July 2019 to June 2021 from 140 regional GP practices in Western Victoria. The longitudinal patterns of proportion of GP telehealth consultations stratified by type of consultation (ie, videoconference vs telephone) and by geographical, consumer, and consultation characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: Telehealth comprised 25.8% (522,932/2,025,615) of GP consultations over the 2-year period. After the introduction of the Australian telehealth expansion policy in March 2020, there was a rapid uptake in GP telehealth services (including telephone and video services), from 0% before COVID-19 to 15% (11,854/80,922) of all consultations in March 2020, peaking at 55% (50,828/92,139) in August 2020. Thereafter, the use of telehealth declined steadily to 31% (23,941/77,344) in January 2021 and tapered off to 28% (29,263/103,798) in June 2021. Telephone services and shorter consultations were the most dominant form, and those aged 15-64 years had higher telehealth use rates than younger or older age groups. The proportion of video consultations was higher during periods with government-imposed lockdowns and higher in the most socioeconomically advantaged areas compared to less socioeconomically advantaged areas. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the continuation of telehealth use in rural and regional Australia post pandemic. Future policy must identify mechanisms to reduce existing equity gaps in video consultations and consider patient- and system-level implications of the dominant use of short telephone consultations. JMIR Publications 2023-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9907565/ /pubmed/36649230 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39384 Text en ©Feby Savira, Liliana Orellana, Martin Hensher, Lan Gao, Andrew Sanigorski, Kevin Mc Namara, Vincent L Versace, John Szakiel, Jamie Swann, Elizabeth Manias, Anna Peeters. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 07.02.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Savira, Feby Orellana, Liliana Hensher, Martin Gao, Lan Sanigorski, Andrew Mc Namara, Kevin Versace, Vincent L Szakiel, John Swann, Jamie Manias, Elizabeth Peeters, Anna Use of General Practitioner Telehealth Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Regional Victoria, Australia: Retrospective Analysis |
title | Use of General Practitioner Telehealth Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Regional Victoria, Australia: Retrospective Analysis |
title_full | Use of General Practitioner Telehealth Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Regional Victoria, Australia: Retrospective Analysis |
title_fullStr | Use of General Practitioner Telehealth Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Regional Victoria, Australia: Retrospective Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of General Practitioner Telehealth Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Regional Victoria, Australia: Retrospective Analysis |
title_short | Use of General Practitioner Telehealth Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Regional Victoria, Australia: Retrospective Analysis |
title_sort | use of general practitioner telehealth services during the covid-19 pandemic in regional victoria, australia: retrospective analysis |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36649230 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39384 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT savirafeby useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis AT orellanaliliana useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis AT henshermartin useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis AT gaolan useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis AT sanigorskiandrew useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis AT mcnamarakevin useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis AT versacevincentl useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis AT szakieljohn useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis AT swannjamie useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis AT maniaselizabeth useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis AT peetersanna useofgeneralpractitionertelehealthservicesduringthecovid19pandemicinregionalvictoriaaustraliaretrospectiveanalysis |