Cargando…

Repeatability and reproducibility of a hyperspectral imaging system for in vivo color evaluation

BACKGROUND: Color imaging is a tried and true method for the evaluation of cosmetic and dermatological effects, but it fails to capture all the information in a scene's spectral reflectance. For this reason, there has been in recent years increasing interest in the use of imaging spectrometers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blaksley, Carl, Udodaira, Kumiko, Yoshida, Mie, Nicolas, Alexandre, Velleman, Damien, Casolino, Marco, Flament, Frederic
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35607718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13160
_version_ 1784884209106550784
author Blaksley, Carl
Udodaira, Kumiko
Yoshida, Mie
Nicolas, Alexandre
Velleman, Damien
Casolino, Marco
Flament, Frederic
author_facet Blaksley, Carl
Udodaira, Kumiko
Yoshida, Mie
Nicolas, Alexandre
Velleman, Damien
Casolino, Marco
Flament, Frederic
author_sort Blaksley, Carl
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Color imaging is a tried and true method for the evaluation of cosmetic and dermatological effects, but it fails to capture all the information in a scene's spectral reflectance. For this reason, there has been in recent years increasing interest in the use of imaging spectrometers for clinical studies and product evaluation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We developed a novel HyperSpectral Imager (HSI) able to take in vivo full‐face format images as a next generation instrument for skin color measurement and beyond. Here, we report part of the results of our first full‐scale validation test of the HSI. We replicated a make‐up foundation screening test by applying three products to a panel of 9 models and evaluated the product L (∗), a (∗), b (∗), and ∆E effect immediately after application relative to the bare skin condition. We repeated this test twice in order to study the repeatability of the HSI as an evaluation instrument and during each test two different operators duplicated the data acquisition so we can assess the reproducibility of the measurements. RESULTS: We find that the measurements from the HSI provide repeatability and reproducibility as good or better than those of our previous benchmark devices. CONCLUSION: From these results, we conclude that not only is the HSI suitable for use in color evaluation studies, but also that it gives operational advantages over the previous generation of evaluation instruments, as it provides a spectral measurement combined with good spatial resolution. This allows for analysis of color over an area and post hoc selection of study regions and so opens new possibilities for studies of complex in vivo phenomena which neither non‐imaging spectrometers nor conventional cameras can pursue. This study also raises points for future work concerning proper inclusion of instrument uncertainty in comparisons of results between instruments and handling of systematic uncertainties from analyses based on a single area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9907626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99076262023-04-13 Repeatability and reproducibility of a hyperspectral imaging system for in vivo color evaluation Blaksley, Carl Udodaira, Kumiko Yoshida, Mie Nicolas, Alexandre Velleman, Damien Casolino, Marco Flament, Frederic Skin Res Technol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Color imaging is a tried and true method for the evaluation of cosmetic and dermatological effects, but it fails to capture all the information in a scene's spectral reflectance. For this reason, there has been in recent years increasing interest in the use of imaging spectrometers for clinical studies and product evaluation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We developed a novel HyperSpectral Imager (HSI) able to take in vivo full‐face format images as a next generation instrument for skin color measurement and beyond. Here, we report part of the results of our first full‐scale validation test of the HSI. We replicated a make‐up foundation screening test by applying three products to a panel of 9 models and evaluated the product L (∗), a (∗), b (∗), and ∆E effect immediately after application relative to the bare skin condition. We repeated this test twice in order to study the repeatability of the HSI as an evaluation instrument and during each test two different operators duplicated the data acquisition so we can assess the reproducibility of the measurements. RESULTS: We find that the measurements from the HSI provide repeatability and reproducibility as good or better than those of our previous benchmark devices. CONCLUSION: From these results, we conclude that not only is the HSI suitable for use in color evaluation studies, but also that it gives operational advantages over the previous generation of evaluation instruments, as it provides a spectral measurement combined with good spatial resolution. This allows for analysis of color over an area and post hoc selection of study regions and so opens new possibilities for studies of complex in vivo phenomena which neither non‐imaging spectrometers nor conventional cameras can pursue. This study also raises points for future work concerning proper inclusion of instrument uncertainty in comparisons of results between instruments and handling of systematic uncertainties from analyses based on a single area. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9907626/ /pubmed/35607718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13160 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Blaksley, Carl
Udodaira, Kumiko
Yoshida, Mie
Nicolas, Alexandre
Velleman, Damien
Casolino, Marco
Flament, Frederic
Repeatability and reproducibility of a hyperspectral imaging system for in vivo color evaluation
title Repeatability and reproducibility of a hyperspectral imaging system for in vivo color evaluation
title_full Repeatability and reproducibility of a hyperspectral imaging system for in vivo color evaluation
title_fullStr Repeatability and reproducibility of a hyperspectral imaging system for in vivo color evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Repeatability and reproducibility of a hyperspectral imaging system for in vivo color evaluation
title_short Repeatability and reproducibility of a hyperspectral imaging system for in vivo color evaluation
title_sort repeatability and reproducibility of a hyperspectral imaging system for in vivo color evaluation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35607718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13160
work_keys_str_mv AT blaksleycarl repeatabilityandreproducibilityofahyperspectralimagingsystemforinvivocolorevaluation
AT udodairakumiko repeatabilityandreproducibilityofahyperspectralimagingsystemforinvivocolorevaluation
AT yoshidamie repeatabilityandreproducibilityofahyperspectralimagingsystemforinvivocolorevaluation
AT nicolasalexandre repeatabilityandreproducibilityofahyperspectralimagingsystemforinvivocolorevaluation
AT vellemandamien repeatabilityandreproducibilityofahyperspectralimagingsystemforinvivocolorevaluation
AT casolinomarco repeatabilityandreproducibilityofahyperspectralimagingsystemforinvivocolorevaluation
AT flamentfrederic repeatabilityandreproducibilityofahyperspectralimagingsystemforinvivocolorevaluation