Cargando…
Digital skin imaging applications, part II: a comprehensive survey of post‐acquisition image utilization features and technology standards
BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing ubiquity and accessibility of teledermatology applications, few studies have comprehensively surveyed their features and technical standards. Importantly, features implemented after the point of capture are often intended to augment image utilization, while technic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36181365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13195 |
_version_ | 1784884210769592320 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Mary D. Kentley, Jonathan Wilson, Britney W. Soyer, H. Peter Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Clara N. Rotemberg, Veronica M. Halpern, Allan C. |
author_facet | Sun, Mary D. Kentley, Jonathan Wilson, Britney W. Soyer, H. Peter Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Clara N. Rotemberg, Veronica M. Halpern, Allan C. |
author_sort | Sun, Mary D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing ubiquity and accessibility of teledermatology applications, few studies have comprehensively surveyed their features and technical standards. Importantly, features implemented after the point of capture are often intended to augment image utilization, while technical standards affect interoperability with existing healthcare systems. We aim to comprehensively survey image utilization features and technical characteristics found within publicly discoverable digital skin imaging applications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Applications were identified and categorized as described in Part I. Included applications were then further assessed by three independent reviewers for post‐imaging content, tools, and functionality. Publicly available information was used to determine the presence or absence of relevant technology standards and/or data characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 20 post‐image acquisition features were identified across three general categories: (1) metadata attachment, (2) functional tools (i.e., those that utilized images or in‐app content to perform a user‐directed function), and (3) image processing. Over 80% of all applications implemented metadata features, with nearly half having metadata features only. Individual feature occurred and feature richness varied significantly by primary audience (p < 0.0001) and function (p < 0.0001). On average, each application included under three features. Less than half of all applications requested consent for user‐uploaded photos and fewer than 10% provided clear data use and privacy policies. CONCLUSION: Post‐imaging functionality in skin imaging applications varies significantly by primary audience and intended function, though nearly all applications implemented metadata labeling. Technical standards are often not implemented or reported consistently. Gaps in the provision of clear consent, data privacy, and data use policies should be urgently addressed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9907633 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99076332023-04-13 Digital skin imaging applications, part II: a comprehensive survey of post‐acquisition image utilization features and technology standards Sun, Mary D. Kentley, Jonathan Wilson, Britney W. Soyer, H. Peter Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Clara N. Rotemberg, Veronica M. Halpern, Allan C. Skin Res Technol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing ubiquity and accessibility of teledermatology applications, few studies have comprehensively surveyed their features and technical standards. Importantly, features implemented after the point of capture are often intended to augment image utilization, while technical standards affect interoperability with existing healthcare systems. We aim to comprehensively survey image utilization features and technical characteristics found within publicly discoverable digital skin imaging applications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Applications were identified and categorized as described in Part I. Included applications were then further assessed by three independent reviewers for post‐imaging content, tools, and functionality. Publicly available information was used to determine the presence or absence of relevant technology standards and/or data characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 20 post‐image acquisition features were identified across three general categories: (1) metadata attachment, (2) functional tools (i.e., those that utilized images or in‐app content to perform a user‐directed function), and (3) image processing. Over 80% of all applications implemented metadata features, with nearly half having metadata features only. Individual feature occurred and feature richness varied significantly by primary audience (p < 0.0001) and function (p < 0.0001). On average, each application included under three features. Less than half of all applications requested consent for user‐uploaded photos and fewer than 10% provided clear data use and privacy policies. CONCLUSION: Post‐imaging functionality in skin imaging applications varies significantly by primary audience and intended function, though nearly all applications implemented metadata labeling. Technical standards are often not implemented or reported consistently. Gaps in the provision of clear consent, data privacy, and data use policies should be urgently addressed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9907633/ /pubmed/36181365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13195 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Sun, Mary D. Kentley, Jonathan Wilson, Britney W. Soyer, H. Peter Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Clara N. Rotemberg, Veronica M. Halpern, Allan C. Digital skin imaging applications, part II: a comprehensive survey of post‐acquisition image utilization features and technology standards |
title | Digital skin imaging applications, part II: a comprehensive survey of post‐acquisition image utilization features and technology standards |
title_full | Digital skin imaging applications, part II: a comprehensive survey of post‐acquisition image utilization features and technology standards |
title_fullStr | Digital skin imaging applications, part II: a comprehensive survey of post‐acquisition image utilization features and technology standards |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital skin imaging applications, part II: a comprehensive survey of post‐acquisition image utilization features and technology standards |
title_short | Digital skin imaging applications, part II: a comprehensive survey of post‐acquisition image utilization features and technology standards |
title_sort | digital skin imaging applications, part ii: a comprehensive survey of post‐acquisition image utilization features and technology standards |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36181365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13195 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunmaryd digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiiacomprehensivesurveyofpostacquisitionimageutilizationfeaturesandtechnologystandards AT kentleyjonathan digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiiacomprehensivesurveyofpostacquisitionimageutilizationfeaturesandtechnologystandards AT wilsonbritneyw digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiiacomprehensivesurveyofpostacquisitionimageutilizationfeaturesandtechnologystandards AT soyerhpeter digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiiacomprehensivesurveyofpostacquisitionimageutilizationfeaturesandtechnologystandards AT curiellewandrowskiclaran digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiiacomprehensivesurveyofpostacquisitionimageutilizationfeaturesandtechnologystandards AT rotembergveronicam digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiiacomprehensivesurveyofpostacquisitionimageutilizationfeaturesandtechnologystandards AT halpernallanc digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiiacomprehensivesurveyofpostacquisitionimageutilizationfeaturesandtechnologystandards AT digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiiacomprehensivesurveyofpostacquisitionimageutilizationfeaturesandtechnologystandards |