Cargando…

Digital skin imaging applications, part II: a comprehensive survey of post‐acquisition image utilization features and technology standards

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing ubiquity and accessibility of teledermatology applications, few studies have comprehensively surveyed their features and technical standards. Importantly, features implemented after the point of capture are often intended to augment image utilization, while technic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Mary D., Kentley, Jonathan, Wilson, Britney W., Soyer, H. Peter, Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Clara N., Rotemberg, Veronica M., Halpern, Allan C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36181365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13195
_version_ 1784884210769592320
author Sun, Mary D.
Kentley, Jonathan
Wilson, Britney W.
Soyer, H. Peter
Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Clara N.
Rotemberg, Veronica M.
Halpern, Allan C.
author_facet Sun, Mary D.
Kentley, Jonathan
Wilson, Britney W.
Soyer, H. Peter
Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Clara N.
Rotemberg, Veronica M.
Halpern, Allan C.
author_sort Sun, Mary D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing ubiquity and accessibility of teledermatology applications, few studies have comprehensively surveyed their features and technical standards. Importantly, features implemented after the point of capture are often intended to augment image utilization, while technical standards affect interoperability with existing healthcare systems. We aim to comprehensively survey image utilization features and technical characteristics found within publicly discoverable digital skin imaging applications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Applications were identified and categorized as described in Part I. Included applications were then further assessed by three independent reviewers for post‐imaging content, tools, and functionality. Publicly available information was used to determine the presence or absence of relevant technology standards and/or data characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 20 post‐image acquisition features were identified across three general categories: (1) metadata attachment, (2) functional tools (i.e., those that utilized images or in‐app content to perform a user‐directed function), and (3) image processing. Over 80% of all applications implemented metadata features, with nearly half having metadata features only. Individual feature occurred and feature richness varied significantly by primary audience (p < 0.0001) and function (p < 0.0001). On average, each application included under three features. Less than half of all applications requested consent for user‐uploaded photos and fewer than 10% provided clear data use and privacy policies. CONCLUSION: Post‐imaging functionality in skin imaging applications varies significantly by primary audience and intended function, though nearly all applications implemented metadata labeling. Technical standards are often not implemented or reported consistently. Gaps in the provision of clear consent, data privacy, and data use policies should be urgently addressed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9907633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99076332023-04-13 Digital skin imaging applications, part II: a comprehensive survey of post‐acquisition image utilization features and technology standards Sun, Mary D. Kentley, Jonathan Wilson, Britney W. Soyer, H. Peter Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Clara N. Rotemberg, Veronica M. Halpern, Allan C. Skin Res Technol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing ubiquity and accessibility of teledermatology applications, few studies have comprehensively surveyed their features and technical standards. Importantly, features implemented after the point of capture are often intended to augment image utilization, while technical standards affect interoperability with existing healthcare systems. We aim to comprehensively survey image utilization features and technical characteristics found within publicly discoverable digital skin imaging applications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Applications were identified and categorized as described in Part I. Included applications were then further assessed by three independent reviewers for post‐imaging content, tools, and functionality. Publicly available information was used to determine the presence or absence of relevant technology standards and/or data characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 20 post‐image acquisition features were identified across three general categories: (1) metadata attachment, (2) functional tools (i.e., those that utilized images or in‐app content to perform a user‐directed function), and (3) image processing. Over 80% of all applications implemented metadata features, with nearly half having metadata features only. Individual feature occurred and feature richness varied significantly by primary audience (p < 0.0001) and function (p < 0.0001). On average, each application included under three features. Less than half of all applications requested consent for user‐uploaded photos and fewer than 10% provided clear data use and privacy policies. CONCLUSION: Post‐imaging functionality in skin imaging applications varies significantly by primary audience and intended function, though nearly all applications implemented metadata labeling. Technical standards are often not implemented or reported consistently. Gaps in the provision of clear consent, data privacy, and data use policies should be urgently addressed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9907633/ /pubmed/36181365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13195 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sun, Mary D.
Kentley, Jonathan
Wilson, Britney W.
Soyer, H. Peter
Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Clara N.
Rotemberg, Veronica M.
Halpern, Allan C.
Digital skin imaging applications, part II: a comprehensive survey of post‐acquisition image utilization features and technology standards
title Digital skin imaging applications, part II: a comprehensive survey of post‐acquisition image utilization features and technology standards
title_full Digital skin imaging applications, part II: a comprehensive survey of post‐acquisition image utilization features and technology standards
title_fullStr Digital skin imaging applications, part II: a comprehensive survey of post‐acquisition image utilization features and technology standards
title_full_unstemmed Digital skin imaging applications, part II: a comprehensive survey of post‐acquisition image utilization features and technology standards
title_short Digital skin imaging applications, part II: a comprehensive survey of post‐acquisition image utilization features and technology standards
title_sort digital skin imaging applications, part ii: a comprehensive survey of post‐acquisition image utilization features and technology standards
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36181365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13195
work_keys_str_mv AT sunmaryd digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiiacomprehensivesurveyofpostacquisitionimageutilizationfeaturesandtechnologystandards
AT kentleyjonathan digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiiacomprehensivesurveyofpostacquisitionimageutilizationfeaturesandtechnologystandards
AT wilsonbritneyw digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiiacomprehensivesurveyofpostacquisitionimageutilizationfeaturesandtechnologystandards
AT soyerhpeter digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiiacomprehensivesurveyofpostacquisitionimageutilizationfeaturesandtechnologystandards
AT curiellewandrowskiclaran digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiiacomprehensivesurveyofpostacquisitionimageutilizationfeaturesandtechnologystandards
AT rotembergveronicam digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiiacomprehensivesurveyofpostacquisitionimageutilizationfeaturesandtechnologystandards
AT halpernallanc digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiiacomprehensivesurveyofpostacquisitionimageutilizationfeaturesandtechnologystandards
AT digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiiacomprehensivesurveyofpostacquisitionimageutilizationfeaturesandtechnologystandards