Cargando…
Digital skin imaging applications, part I: Assessment of image acquisition technique features
BACKGROUND: The rapid adoption of digital skin imaging applications has increased the utilization of smartphone‐acquired images in dermatology. While this has enormous potential for scaling the assessment of concerning skin lesions, the insufficient quality of many consumer/patient‐taken images can...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35652379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13163 |
_version_ | 1784884214981722112 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Mary D. Kentley, Jonathan Wilson, Britney W. Soyer, H. Peter Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Clara N. Rotemberg, Veronica Halpern, Allan C. |
author_facet | Sun, Mary D. Kentley, Jonathan Wilson, Britney W. Soyer, H. Peter Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Clara N. Rotemberg, Veronica Halpern, Allan C. |
author_sort | Sun, Mary D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The rapid adoption of digital skin imaging applications has increased the utilization of smartphone‐acquired images in dermatology. While this has enormous potential for scaling the assessment of concerning skin lesions, the insufficient quality of many consumer/patient‐taken images can undermine clinical accuracy and potentially harm patients due to lack of diagnostic interpretability. We aim to characterize the current state of digital skin imaging applications and comprehensively assess how image acquisition features address image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Publicly discoverable mobile, web, and desktop‐based skin imaging applications, identified through keyword searches in mobile app stores, Google Search queries, previous teledermatology studies, and expert recommendations were independently assessed by three reviewers. Applications were categorized by primary audience (consumer‐facing, nonhospital‐based practice, or enterprise/health system), function (education, store‐and‐forward teledermatology, live‐interactive teledermatology, electronic medical record adjunct/clinical imaging storage, or clinical triage), in‐app connection to a healthcare provider (yes or no), and user type (patient, provider, or both). RESULTS: Just over half (57%) of 191 included skin imaging applications had at least one of 14 image acquisition technique features. Those that were consumer‐facing, intended for educational use, and designed for both patient and physician users had significantly greater feature richness (p < 0.05). The most common feature was the inclusion of text‐based imaging tips, followed by the requirement to submit multiple images and body area matching. CONCLUSION: Very few skin imaging applications included more than one image acquisition technique feature. Feature richness varied significantly by audience, function, and user categories. Users of digital dermatology tools should consider which applications have standardized features that improve image quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9907654 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99076542023-04-13 Digital skin imaging applications, part I: Assessment of image acquisition technique features Sun, Mary D. Kentley, Jonathan Wilson, Britney W. Soyer, H. Peter Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Clara N. Rotemberg, Veronica Halpern, Allan C. Skin Res Technol Original Articles BACKGROUND: The rapid adoption of digital skin imaging applications has increased the utilization of smartphone‐acquired images in dermatology. While this has enormous potential for scaling the assessment of concerning skin lesions, the insufficient quality of many consumer/patient‐taken images can undermine clinical accuracy and potentially harm patients due to lack of diagnostic interpretability. We aim to characterize the current state of digital skin imaging applications and comprehensively assess how image acquisition features address image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Publicly discoverable mobile, web, and desktop‐based skin imaging applications, identified through keyword searches in mobile app stores, Google Search queries, previous teledermatology studies, and expert recommendations were independently assessed by three reviewers. Applications were categorized by primary audience (consumer‐facing, nonhospital‐based practice, or enterprise/health system), function (education, store‐and‐forward teledermatology, live‐interactive teledermatology, electronic medical record adjunct/clinical imaging storage, or clinical triage), in‐app connection to a healthcare provider (yes or no), and user type (patient, provider, or both). RESULTS: Just over half (57%) of 191 included skin imaging applications had at least one of 14 image acquisition technique features. Those that were consumer‐facing, intended for educational use, and designed for both patient and physician users had significantly greater feature richness (p < 0.05). The most common feature was the inclusion of text‐based imaging tips, followed by the requirement to submit multiple images and body area matching. CONCLUSION: Very few skin imaging applications included more than one image acquisition technique feature. Feature richness varied significantly by audience, function, and user categories. Users of digital dermatology tools should consider which applications have standardized features that improve image quality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9907654/ /pubmed/35652379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13163 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Sun, Mary D. Kentley, Jonathan Wilson, Britney W. Soyer, H. Peter Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Clara N. Rotemberg, Veronica Halpern, Allan C. Digital skin imaging applications, part I: Assessment of image acquisition technique features |
title | Digital skin imaging applications, part I: Assessment of image acquisition technique features |
title_full | Digital skin imaging applications, part I: Assessment of image acquisition technique features |
title_fullStr | Digital skin imaging applications, part I: Assessment of image acquisition technique features |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital skin imaging applications, part I: Assessment of image acquisition technique features |
title_short | Digital skin imaging applications, part I: Assessment of image acquisition technique features |
title_sort | digital skin imaging applications, part i: assessment of image acquisition technique features |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35652379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13163 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunmaryd digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiassessmentofimageacquisitiontechniquefeatures AT kentleyjonathan digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiassessmentofimageacquisitiontechniquefeatures AT wilsonbritneyw digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiassessmentofimageacquisitiontechniquefeatures AT soyerhpeter digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiassessmentofimageacquisitiontechniquefeatures AT curiellewandrowskiclaran digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiassessmentofimageacquisitiontechniquefeatures AT rotembergveronica digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiassessmentofimageacquisitiontechniquefeatures AT halpernallanc digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiassessmentofimageacquisitiontechniquefeatures AT digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiassessmentofimageacquisitiontechniquefeatures |