Cargando…

Digital skin imaging applications, part I: Assessment of image acquisition technique features

BACKGROUND: The rapid adoption of digital skin imaging applications has increased the utilization of smartphone‐acquired images in dermatology. While this has enormous potential for scaling the assessment of concerning skin lesions, the insufficient quality of many consumer/patient‐taken images can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Mary D., Kentley, Jonathan, Wilson, Britney W., Soyer, H. Peter, Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Clara N., Rotemberg, Veronica, Halpern, Allan C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35652379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13163
_version_ 1784884214981722112
author Sun, Mary D.
Kentley, Jonathan
Wilson, Britney W.
Soyer, H. Peter
Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Clara N.
Rotemberg, Veronica
Halpern, Allan C.
author_facet Sun, Mary D.
Kentley, Jonathan
Wilson, Britney W.
Soyer, H. Peter
Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Clara N.
Rotemberg, Veronica
Halpern, Allan C.
author_sort Sun, Mary D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The rapid adoption of digital skin imaging applications has increased the utilization of smartphone‐acquired images in dermatology. While this has enormous potential for scaling the assessment of concerning skin lesions, the insufficient quality of many consumer/patient‐taken images can undermine clinical accuracy and potentially harm patients due to lack of diagnostic interpretability. We aim to characterize the current state of digital skin imaging applications and comprehensively assess how image acquisition features address image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Publicly discoverable mobile, web, and desktop‐based skin imaging applications, identified through keyword searches in mobile app stores, Google Search queries, previous teledermatology studies, and expert recommendations were independently assessed by three reviewers. Applications were categorized by primary audience (consumer‐facing, nonhospital‐based practice, or enterprise/health system), function (education, store‐and‐forward teledermatology, live‐interactive teledermatology, electronic medical record adjunct/clinical imaging storage, or clinical triage), in‐app connection to a healthcare provider (yes or no), and user type (patient, provider, or both). RESULTS: Just over half (57%) of 191 included skin imaging applications had at least one of 14 image acquisition technique features. Those that were consumer‐facing, intended for educational use, and designed for both patient and physician users had significantly greater feature richness (p < 0.05). The most common feature was the inclusion of text‐based imaging tips, followed by the requirement to submit multiple images and body area matching. CONCLUSION: Very few skin imaging applications included more than one image acquisition technique feature. Feature richness varied significantly by audience, function, and user categories. Users of digital dermatology tools should consider which applications have standardized features that improve image quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9907654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99076542023-04-13 Digital skin imaging applications, part I: Assessment of image acquisition technique features Sun, Mary D. Kentley, Jonathan Wilson, Britney W. Soyer, H. Peter Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Clara N. Rotemberg, Veronica Halpern, Allan C. Skin Res Technol Original Articles BACKGROUND: The rapid adoption of digital skin imaging applications has increased the utilization of smartphone‐acquired images in dermatology. While this has enormous potential for scaling the assessment of concerning skin lesions, the insufficient quality of many consumer/patient‐taken images can undermine clinical accuracy and potentially harm patients due to lack of diagnostic interpretability. We aim to characterize the current state of digital skin imaging applications and comprehensively assess how image acquisition features address image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Publicly discoverable mobile, web, and desktop‐based skin imaging applications, identified through keyword searches in mobile app stores, Google Search queries, previous teledermatology studies, and expert recommendations were independently assessed by three reviewers. Applications were categorized by primary audience (consumer‐facing, nonhospital‐based practice, or enterprise/health system), function (education, store‐and‐forward teledermatology, live‐interactive teledermatology, electronic medical record adjunct/clinical imaging storage, or clinical triage), in‐app connection to a healthcare provider (yes or no), and user type (patient, provider, or both). RESULTS: Just over half (57%) of 191 included skin imaging applications had at least one of 14 image acquisition technique features. Those that were consumer‐facing, intended for educational use, and designed for both patient and physician users had significantly greater feature richness (p < 0.05). The most common feature was the inclusion of text‐based imaging tips, followed by the requirement to submit multiple images and body area matching. CONCLUSION: Very few skin imaging applications included more than one image acquisition technique feature. Feature richness varied significantly by audience, function, and user categories. Users of digital dermatology tools should consider which applications have standardized features that improve image quality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9907654/ /pubmed/35652379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13163 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sun, Mary D.
Kentley, Jonathan
Wilson, Britney W.
Soyer, H. Peter
Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Clara N.
Rotemberg, Veronica
Halpern, Allan C.
Digital skin imaging applications, part I: Assessment of image acquisition technique features
title Digital skin imaging applications, part I: Assessment of image acquisition technique features
title_full Digital skin imaging applications, part I: Assessment of image acquisition technique features
title_fullStr Digital skin imaging applications, part I: Assessment of image acquisition technique features
title_full_unstemmed Digital skin imaging applications, part I: Assessment of image acquisition technique features
title_short Digital skin imaging applications, part I: Assessment of image acquisition technique features
title_sort digital skin imaging applications, part i: assessment of image acquisition technique features
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35652379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13163
work_keys_str_mv AT sunmaryd digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiassessmentofimageacquisitiontechniquefeatures
AT kentleyjonathan digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiassessmentofimageacquisitiontechniquefeatures
AT wilsonbritneyw digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiassessmentofimageacquisitiontechniquefeatures
AT soyerhpeter digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiassessmentofimageacquisitiontechniquefeatures
AT curiellewandrowskiclaran digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiassessmentofimageacquisitiontechniquefeatures
AT rotembergveronica digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiassessmentofimageacquisitiontechniquefeatures
AT halpernallanc digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiassessmentofimageacquisitiontechniquefeatures
AT digitalskinimagingapplicationspartiassessmentofimageacquisitiontechniquefeatures