Cargando…

An evaluation of 24 h Holter monitoring in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1

AIMS: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of routine 24 h Holter monitoring to screen for conduction disturbances and arrhythmias in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective two-centre study was conducted including DM1-affected individuals undergoing rou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joosten, Isis B T, Janssen, Cheyenne E W, Horlings, Corinne G C, den Uijl, Dennis, Evertz, Reinder, van Engelen, Baziel G M, Faber, Catharina G, Vernooy, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35851806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac104
_version_ 1784884235469848576
author Joosten, Isis B T
Janssen, Cheyenne E W
Horlings, Corinne G C
den Uijl, Dennis
Evertz, Reinder
van Engelen, Baziel G M
Faber, Catharina G
Vernooy, Kevin
author_facet Joosten, Isis B T
Janssen, Cheyenne E W
Horlings, Corinne G C
den Uijl, Dennis
Evertz, Reinder
van Engelen, Baziel G M
Faber, Catharina G
Vernooy, Kevin
author_sort Joosten, Isis B T
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of routine 24 h Holter monitoring to screen for conduction disturbances and arrhythmias in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective two-centre study was conducted including DM1-affected individuals undergoing routine cardiac screening with at least one 24 h Holter monitoring between January 2010 and December 2020. For each individual, the following data were collected: Holter results, results of electrocardiograms (ECGs) performed at the same year as Holter monitoring, presence of cardiac complaints, and neuromuscular status. Holter findings were compared with the results of cardiac screening (ECG + history taking) performed at the same year. Cardiac conduction abnormalities and/or arrhythmias that would have remained undiagnosed based on history taking and ECG alone were considered de novo findings. A total 235 genetically confirmed DM1 patients were included. Abnormal Holter results were discovered in 126 (54%) patients after a mean follow-up of 64 ± 28 months in which an average of 3 ± 1 Holter recordings per patient was performed. Abnormalities upon Holter mainly consisted of conduction disorders (70%) such as atrioventricular (AV) block. Out of 126 patients with abnormal Holter findings, 74 (59%) patients had de novo Holter findings including second-degree AV block, atrial fibrillation/flutter and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. Patient characteristics were unable to predict the occurrence of de novo Holter findings. In 39 out of 133 (29%) patients with normal ECGs upon yearly cardiac screening, abnormalities were found on Holter monitoring during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Twenty-four hour Holter monitoring is of added value to routine cardiac screening for all DM1 patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9907751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99077512023-02-09 An evaluation of 24 h Holter monitoring in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 Joosten, Isis B T Janssen, Cheyenne E W Horlings, Corinne G C den Uijl, Dennis Evertz, Reinder van Engelen, Baziel G M Faber, Catharina G Vernooy, Kevin Europace Clinical Research AIMS: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of routine 24 h Holter monitoring to screen for conduction disturbances and arrhythmias in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective two-centre study was conducted including DM1-affected individuals undergoing routine cardiac screening with at least one 24 h Holter monitoring between January 2010 and December 2020. For each individual, the following data were collected: Holter results, results of electrocardiograms (ECGs) performed at the same year as Holter monitoring, presence of cardiac complaints, and neuromuscular status. Holter findings were compared with the results of cardiac screening (ECG + history taking) performed at the same year. Cardiac conduction abnormalities and/or arrhythmias that would have remained undiagnosed based on history taking and ECG alone were considered de novo findings. A total 235 genetically confirmed DM1 patients were included. Abnormal Holter results were discovered in 126 (54%) patients after a mean follow-up of 64 ± 28 months in which an average of 3 ± 1 Holter recordings per patient was performed. Abnormalities upon Holter mainly consisted of conduction disorders (70%) such as atrioventricular (AV) block. Out of 126 patients with abnormal Holter findings, 74 (59%) patients had de novo Holter findings including second-degree AV block, atrial fibrillation/flutter and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. Patient characteristics were unable to predict the occurrence of de novo Holter findings. In 39 out of 133 (29%) patients with normal ECGs upon yearly cardiac screening, abnormalities were found on Holter monitoring during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Twenty-four hour Holter monitoring is of added value to routine cardiac screening for all DM1 patients. Oxford University Press 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9907751/ /pubmed/35851806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac104 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Joosten, Isis B T
Janssen, Cheyenne E W
Horlings, Corinne G C
den Uijl, Dennis
Evertz, Reinder
van Engelen, Baziel G M
Faber, Catharina G
Vernooy, Kevin
An evaluation of 24 h Holter monitoring in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1
title An evaluation of 24 h Holter monitoring in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1
title_full An evaluation of 24 h Holter monitoring in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1
title_fullStr An evaluation of 24 h Holter monitoring in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of 24 h Holter monitoring in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1
title_short An evaluation of 24 h Holter monitoring in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1
title_sort evaluation of 24 h holter monitoring in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35851806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac104
work_keys_str_mv AT joostenisisbt anevaluationof24hholtermonitoringinpatientswithmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT janssencheyenneew anevaluationof24hholtermonitoringinpatientswithmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT horlingscorinnegc anevaluationof24hholtermonitoringinpatientswithmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT denuijldennis anevaluationof24hholtermonitoringinpatientswithmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT evertzreinder anevaluationof24hholtermonitoringinpatientswithmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT vanengelenbazielgm anevaluationof24hholtermonitoringinpatientswithmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT fabercatharinag anevaluationof24hholtermonitoringinpatientswithmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT vernooykevin anevaluationof24hholtermonitoringinpatientswithmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT joostenisisbt evaluationof24hholtermonitoringinpatientswithmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT janssencheyenneew evaluationof24hholtermonitoringinpatientswithmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT horlingscorinnegc evaluationof24hholtermonitoringinpatientswithmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT denuijldennis evaluationof24hholtermonitoringinpatientswithmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT evertzreinder evaluationof24hholtermonitoringinpatientswithmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT vanengelenbazielgm evaluationof24hholtermonitoringinpatientswithmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT fabercatharinag evaluationof24hholtermonitoringinpatientswithmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT vernooykevin evaluationof24hholtermonitoringinpatientswithmyotonicdystrophytype1