Cargando…
Nasal drip of dexmedetomidine for optimal sedation during PICC insertion in pediatric burn care
For peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) inserting, tranquil cooperation of children for an extended period is often required. Therefore, sedation is routinely induced clinically prior to PICC inserting. Chloral hydrate is a commonly used sedative for children. However, its clinical accepta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36820563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032831 |
_version_ | 1784884275697418240 |
---|---|
author | Lu, Yanxu Peng, Cheng Xie, Li Wu, Ying Gu, Lifang Li, Sha |
author_facet | Lu, Yanxu Peng, Cheng Xie, Li Wu, Ying Gu, Lifang Li, Sha |
author_sort | Lu, Yanxu |
collection | PubMed |
description | For peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) inserting, tranquil cooperation of children for an extended period is often required. Therefore, sedation is routinely induced clinically prior to PICC inserting. Chloral hydrate is a commonly used sedative for children. However, its clinical acceptance has remained low. And the sedation effect is non-satisfactory. Previous studies have confirmed the safety and effectiveness of intravenous/oral dosing or nasal dripping for sedation during the examinations of electrocardiography and computed tomography. Yet few studies have assessed the sedating efficacy of dexmedetomidine nasal drops for PICC inserting. METHODS: From a cohort of 40 hospitalized patients scheduled for PICC inserting, 15 children employing a novel sedative mode of dexmedetomidine nasal drops at a dose of 2 ug/kg were assigned into group A while group B included another 25 children sedated routinely via an enema of 10% chloral hydrate at a dose of 0.5 mL/kg. The Ramsay’s scoring criteria were utilized for assessing the status of sedation. Two groups were observed with regards to success rate of sedation, onset time of sedation and occurrences of adverse reactions. RESULTS: Statistical inter-group differences existed in success rate and onset time of sedation. The success rate of group A was higher than that of group B (93.3% vs 64.0%, X(2) = 4.302, P = .038 < 0.05). Group A had a faster onset of sedation than group B (14.86 ± 2.57 vs 19.06 ± 3.40 minutes, t = 3.781, P = .001 < 0.05). No inter-group difference of statistical significance existed in occurrence of adverse reactions (P = 1.000 > 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the success rate of sedation in group A was higher than that in group B, and the difference was statistically significant (P = .036 < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For sedating burn children, nasal dripping of dexmedetomidine is both safe and effective during PICC inserting. Without any obvious adverse reaction, it may relieve sufferings and enhance acceptance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9907929 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99079292023-02-10 Nasal drip of dexmedetomidine for optimal sedation during PICC insertion in pediatric burn care Lu, Yanxu Peng, Cheng Xie, Li Wu, Ying Gu, Lifang Li, Sha Medicine (Baltimore) 6200 For peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) inserting, tranquil cooperation of children for an extended period is often required. Therefore, sedation is routinely induced clinically prior to PICC inserting. Chloral hydrate is a commonly used sedative for children. However, its clinical acceptance has remained low. And the sedation effect is non-satisfactory. Previous studies have confirmed the safety and effectiveness of intravenous/oral dosing or nasal dripping for sedation during the examinations of electrocardiography and computed tomography. Yet few studies have assessed the sedating efficacy of dexmedetomidine nasal drops for PICC inserting. METHODS: From a cohort of 40 hospitalized patients scheduled for PICC inserting, 15 children employing a novel sedative mode of dexmedetomidine nasal drops at a dose of 2 ug/kg were assigned into group A while group B included another 25 children sedated routinely via an enema of 10% chloral hydrate at a dose of 0.5 mL/kg. The Ramsay’s scoring criteria were utilized for assessing the status of sedation. Two groups were observed with regards to success rate of sedation, onset time of sedation and occurrences of adverse reactions. RESULTS: Statistical inter-group differences existed in success rate and onset time of sedation. The success rate of group A was higher than that of group B (93.3% vs 64.0%, X(2) = 4.302, P = .038 < 0.05). Group A had a faster onset of sedation than group B (14.86 ± 2.57 vs 19.06 ± 3.40 minutes, t = 3.781, P = .001 < 0.05). No inter-group difference of statistical significance existed in occurrence of adverse reactions (P = 1.000 > 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the success rate of sedation in group A was higher than that in group B, and the difference was statistically significant (P = .036 < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For sedating burn children, nasal dripping of dexmedetomidine is both safe and effective during PICC inserting. Without any obvious adverse reaction, it may relieve sufferings and enhance acceptance. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9907929/ /pubmed/36820563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032831 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | 6200 Lu, Yanxu Peng, Cheng Xie, Li Wu, Ying Gu, Lifang Li, Sha Nasal drip of dexmedetomidine for optimal sedation during PICC insertion in pediatric burn care |
title | Nasal drip of dexmedetomidine for optimal sedation during PICC insertion in pediatric burn care |
title_full | Nasal drip of dexmedetomidine for optimal sedation during PICC insertion in pediatric burn care |
title_fullStr | Nasal drip of dexmedetomidine for optimal sedation during PICC insertion in pediatric burn care |
title_full_unstemmed | Nasal drip of dexmedetomidine for optimal sedation during PICC insertion in pediatric burn care |
title_short | Nasal drip of dexmedetomidine for optimal sedation during PICC insertion in pediatric burn care |
title_sort | nasal drip of dexmedetomidine for optimal sedation during picc insertion in pediatric burn care |
topic | 6200 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36820563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032831 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luyanxu nasaldripofdexmedetomidineforoptimalsedationduringpiccinsertioninpediatricburncare AT pengcheng nasaldripofdexmedetomidineforoptimalsedationduringpiccinsertioninpediatricburncare AT xieli nasaldripofdexmedetomidineforoptimalsedationduringpiccinsertioninpediatricburncare AT wuying nasaldripofdexmedetomidineforoptimalsedationduringpiccinsertioninpediatricburncare AT gulifang nasaldripofdexmedetomidineforoptimalsedationduringpiccinsertioninpediatricburncare AT lisha nasaldripofdexmedetomidineforoptimalsedationduringpiccinsertioninpediatricburncare |