Cargando…

Nasal drip of dexmedetomidine for optimal sedation during PICC insertion in pediatric burn care

For peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) inserting, tranquil cooperation of children for an extended period is often required. Therefore, sedation is routinely induced clinically prior to PICC inserting. Chloral hydrate is a commonly used sedative for children. However, its clinical accepta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Yanxu, Peng, Cheng, Xie, Li, Wu, Ying, Gu, Lifang, Li, Sha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36820563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032831
_version_ 1784884275697418240
author Lu, Yanxu
Peng, Cheng
Xie, Li
Wu, Ying
Gu, Lifang
Li, Sha
author_facet Lu, Yanxu
Peng, Cheng
Xie, Li
Wu, Ying
Gu, Lifang
Li, Sha
author_sort Lu, Yanxu
collection PubMed
description For peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) inserting, tranquil cooperation of children for an extended period is often required. Therefore, sedation is routinely induced clinically prior to PICC inserting. Chloral hydrate is a commonly used sedative for children. However, its clinical acceptance has remained low. And the sedation effect is non-satisfactory. Previous studies have confirmed the safety and effectiveness of intravenous/oral dosing or nasal dripping for sedation during the examinations of electrocardiography and computed tomography. Yet few studies have assessed the sedating efficacy of dexmedetomidine nasal drops for PICC inserting. METHODS: From a cohort of 40 hospitalized patients scheduled for PICC inserting, 15 children employing a novel sedative mode of dexmedetomidine nasal drops at a dose of 2 ug/kg were assigned into group A while group B included another 25 children sedated routinely via an enema of 10% chloral hydrate at a dose of 0.5 mL/kg. The Ramsay’s scoring criteria were utilized for assessing the status of sedation. Two groups were observed with regards to success rate of sedation, onset time of sedation and occurrences of adverse reactions. RESULTS: Statistical inter-group differences existed in success rate and onset time of sedation. The success rate of group A was higher than that of group B (93.3% vs 64.0%, X(2) = 4.302, P = .038 < 0.05). Group A had a faster onset of sedation than group B (14.86 ± 2.57 vs 19.06 ± 3.40 minutes, t = 3.781, P = .001 < 0.05). No inter-group difference of statistical significance existed in occurrence of adverse reactions (P = 1.000 > 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the success rate of sedation in group A was higher than that in group B, and the difference was statistically significant (P = .036 < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For sedating burn children, nasal dripping of dexmedetomidine is both safe and effective during PICC inserting. Without any obvious adverse reaction, it may relieve sufferings and enhance acceptance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9907929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99079292023-02-10 Nasal drip of dexmedetomidine for optimal sedation during PICC insertion in pediatric burn care Lu, Yanxu Peng, Cheng Xie, Li Wu, Ying Gu, Lifang Li, Sha Medicine (Baltimore) 6200 For peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) inserting, tranquil cooperation of children for an extended period is often required. Therefore, sedation is routinely induced clinically prior to PICC inserting. Chloral hydrate is a commonly used sedative for children. However, its clinical acceptance has remained low. And the sedation effect is non-satisfactory. Previous studies have confirmed the safety and effectiveness of intravenous/oral dosing or nasal dripping for sedation during the examinations of electrocardiography and computed tomography. Yet few studies have assessed the sedating efficacy of dexmedetomidine nasal drops for PICC inserting. METHODS: From a cohort of 40 hospitalized patients scheduled for PICC inserting, 15 children employing a novel sedative mode of dexmedetomidine nasal drops at a dose of 2 ug/kg were assigned into group A while group B included another 25 children sedated routinely via an enema of 10% chloral hydrate at a dose of 0.5 mL/kg. The Ramsay’s scoring criteria were utilized for assessing the status of sedation. Two groups were observed with regards to success rate of sedation, onset time of sedation and occurrences of adverse reactions. RESULTS: Statistical inter-group differences existed in success rate and onset time of sedation. The success rate of group A was higher than that of group B (93.3% vs 64.0%, X(2) = 4.302, P = .038 < 0.05). Group A had a faster onset of sedation than group B (14.86 ± 2.57 vs 19.06 ± 3.40 minutes, t = 3.781, P = .001 < 0.05). No inter-group difference of statistical significance existed in occurrence of adverse reactions (P = 1.000 > 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the success rate of sedation in group A was higher than that in group B, and the difference was statistically significant (P = .036 < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For sedating burn children, nasal dripping of dexmedetomidine is both safe and effective during PICC inserting. Without any obvious adverse reaction, it may relieve sufferings and enhance acceptance. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9907929/ /pubmed/36820563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032831 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle 6200
Lu, Yanxu
Peng, Cheng
Xie, Li
Wu, Ying
Gu, Lifang
Li, Sha
Nasal drip of dexmedetomidine for optimal sedation during PICC insertion in pediatric burn care
title Nasal drip of dexmedetomidine for optimal sedation during PICC insertion in pediatric burn care
title_full Nasal drip of dexmedetomidine for optimal sedation during PICC insertion in pediatric burn care
title_fullStr Nasal drip of dexmedetomidine for optimal sedation during PICC insertion in pediatric burn care
title_full_unstemmed Nasal drip of dexmedetomidine for optimal sedation during PICC insertion in pediatric burn care
title_short Nasal drip of dexmedetomidine for optimal sedation during PICC insertion in pediatric burn care
title_sort nasal drip of dexmedetomidine for optimal sedation during picc insertion in pediatric burn care
topic 6200
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36820563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032831
work_keys_str_mv AT luyanxu nasaldripofdexmedetomidineforoptimalsedationduringpiccinsertioninpediatricburncare
AT pengcheng nasaldripofdexmedetomidineforoptimalsedationduringpiccinsertioninpediatricburncare
AT xieli nasaldripofdexmedetomidineforoptimalsedationduringpiccinsertioninpediatricburncare
AT wuying nasaldripofdexmedetomidineforoptimalsedationduringpiccinsertioninpediatricburncare
AT gulifang nasaldripofdexmedetomidineforoptimalsedationduringpiccinsertioninpediatricburncare
AT lisha nasaldripofdexmedetomidineforoptimalsedationduringpiccinsertioninpediatricburncare