Cargando…

Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective single-center study

While mechanical ventilation practices on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) are variable, most institutions utilize a lung rest strategy utilizing relatively low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The effect of PEEP titration using esophageal manometry during VV ECMO on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Estoos, Ethan M., Jocham, Kevin P., Zhang, Chengda, Benson, Lauren M., Milas, Anamaria, Zakhary, Bishoy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9908009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36764115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154274
_version_ 1784884294389334016
author Estoos, Ethan M.
Jocham, Kevin P.
Zhang, Chengda
Benson, Lauren M.
Milas, Anamaria
Zakhary, Bishoy
author_facet Estoos, Ethan M.
Jocham, Kevin P.
Zhang, Chengda
Benson, Lauren M.
Milas, Anamaria
Zakhary, Bishoy
author_sort Estoos, Ethan M.
collection PubMed
description While mechanical ventilation practices on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) are variable, most institutions utilize a lung rest strategy utilizing relatively low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The effect of PEEP titration using esophageal manometry during VV ECMO on pulmonary and cardiac function is unknown. This was a retrospective study of 69 patients initiated on VV ECMO between March 2020 through November 2021. Patients underwent standard PEEP (typically 10 cm H(2)O) or optimal PEEP (PEEP titrated to an end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure 0–3 cm H(2)O) throughout the ECMO run. The optimal PEEP strategy had higher levels of applied PEEP (17.9 vs. 10.8 cm H(2)O on day 2 of ECMO), decreased incidence of hemodynamically significant RV dysfunction (4.55% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.0001), and higher survival to decannulation (72.7% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.022). Survival to discharge did not reach statistical significance (61.4% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.211). In univariate logistic regression analysis, optimal PEEP was associated with less hemodynamically significant RV dysfunction with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01–0.27, p = 0.0008) and increased survival to decannulation with an OR of 3.39 (95% CI 1.23–9.79), p = 0.02), though other confounding factors may have contributed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9908009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99080092023-02-09 Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective single-center study Estoos, Ethan M. Jocham, Kevin P. Zhang, Chengda Benson, Lauren M. Milas, Anamaria Zakhary, Bishoy J Crit Care Article While mechanical ventilation practices on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) are variable, most institutions utilize a lung rest strategy utilizing relatively low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The effect of PEEP titration using esophageal manometry during VV ECMO on pulmonary and cardiac function is unknown. This was a retrospective study of 69 patients initiated on VV ECMO between March 2020 through November 2021. Patients underwent standard PEEP (typically 10 cm H(2)O) or optimal PEEP (PEEP titrated to an end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure 0–3 cm H(2)O) throughout the ECMO run. The optimal PEEP strategy had higher levels of applied PEEP (17.9 vs. 10.8 cm H(2)O on day 2 of ECMO), decreased incidence of hemodynamically significant RV dysfunction (4.55% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.0001), and higher survival to decannulation (72.7% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.022). Survival to discharge did not reach statistical significance (61.4% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.211). In univariate logistic regression analysis, optimal PEEP was associated with less hemodynamically significant RV dysfunction with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01–0.27, p = 0.0008) and increased survival to decannulation with an OR of 3.39 (95% CI 1.23–9.79), p = 0.02), though other confounding factors may have contributed. Elsevier Inc. 2023-06 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9908009/ /pubmed/36764115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154274 Text en © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Estoos, Ethan M.
Jocham, Kevin P.
Zhang, Chengda
Benson, Lauren M.
Milas, Anamaria
Zakhary, Bishoy
Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective single-center study
title Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective single-center study
title_full Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective single-center study
title_fullStr Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective single-center study
title_full_unstemmed Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective single-center study
title_short Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective single-center study
title_sort optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in covid-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective single-center study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9908009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36764115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154274
work_keys_str_mv AT estoosethanm optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurereducesrightventriculardysfunctionincovid19patientsonvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT jochamkevinp optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurereducesrightventriculardysfunctionincovid19patientsonvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT zhangchengda optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurereducesrightventriculardysfunctionincovid19patientsonvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT bensonlaurenm optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurereducesrightventriculardysfunctionincovid19patientsonvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT milasanamaria optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurereducesrightventriculardysfunctionincovid19patientsonvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT zakharybishoy optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurereducesrightventriculardysfunctionincovid19patientsonvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy