Cargando…
Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective single-center study
While mechanical ventilation practices on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) are variable, most institutions utilize a lung rest strategy utilizing relatively low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The effect of PEEP titration using esophageal manometry during VV ECMO on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9908009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36764115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154274 |
_version_ | 1784884294389334016 |
---|---|
author | Estoos, Ethan M. Jocham, Kevin P. Zhang, Chengda Benson, Lauren M. Milas, Anamaria Zakhary, Bishoy |
author_facet | Estoos, Ethan M. Jocham, Kevin P. Zhang, Chengda Benson, Lauren M. Milas, Anamaria Zakhary, Bishoy |
author_sort | Estoos, Ethan M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | While mechanical ventilation practices on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) are variable, most institutions utilize a lung rest strategy utilizing relatively low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The effect of PEEP titration using esophageal manometry during VV ECMO on pulmonary and cardiac function is unknown. This was a retrospective study of 69 patients initiated on VV ECMO between March 2020 through November 2021. Patients underwent standard PEEP (typically 10 cm H(2)O) or optimal PEEP (PEEP titrated to an end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure 0–3 cm H(2)O) throughout the ECMO run. The optimal PEEP strategy had higher levels of applied PEEP (17.9 vs. 10.8 cm H(2)O on day 2 of ECMO), decreased incidence of hemodynamically significant RV dysfunction (4.55% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.0001), and higher survival to decannulation (72.7% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.022). Survival to discharge did not reach statistical significance (61.4% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.211). In univariate logistic regression analysis, optimal PEEP was associated with less hemodynamically significant RV dysfunction with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01–0.27, p = 0.0008) and increased survival to decannulation with an OR of 3.39 (95% CI 1.23–9.79), p = 0.02), though other confounding factors may have contributed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9908009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99080092023-02-09 Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective single-center study Estoos, Ethan M. Jocham, Kevin P. Zhang, Chengda Benson, Lauren M. Milas, Anamaria Zakhary, Bishoy J Crit Care Article While mechanical ventilation practices on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) are variable, most institutions utilize a lung rest strategy utilizing relatively low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The effect of PEEP titration using esophageal manometry during VV ECMO on pulmonary and cardiac function is unknown. This was a retrospective study of 69 patients initiated on VV ECMO between March 2020 through November 2021. Patients underwent standard PEEP (typically 10 cm H(2)O) or optimal PEEP (PEEP titrated to an end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure 0–3 cm H(2)O) throughout the ECMO run. The optimal PEEP strategy had higher levels of applied PEEP (17.9 vs. 10.8 cm H(2)O on day 2 of ECMO), decreased incidence of hemodynamically significant RV dysfunction (4.55% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.0001), and higher survival to decannulation (72.7% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.022). Survival to discharge did not reach statistical significance (61.4% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.211). In univariate logistic regression analysis, optimal PEEP was associated with less hemodynamically significant RV dysfunction with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01–0.27, p = 0.0008) and increased survival to decannulation with an OR of 3.39 (95% CI 1.23–9.79), p = 0.02), though other confounding factors may have contributed. Elsevier Inc. 2023-06 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9908009/ /pubmed/36764115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154274 Text en © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Estoos, Ethan M. Jocham, Kevin P. Zhang, Chengda Benson, Lauren M. Milas, Anamaria Zakhary, Bishoy Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective single-center study |
title | Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective single-center study |
title_full | Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective single-center study |
title_fullStr | Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective single-center study |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective single-center study |
title_short | Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective single-center study |
title_sort | optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in covid-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective single-center study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9908009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36764115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154274 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT estoosethanm optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurereducesrightventriculardysfunctionincovid19patientsonvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT jochamkevinp optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurereducesrightventriculardysfunctionincovid19patientsonvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT zhangchengda optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurereducesrightventriculardysfunctionincovid19patientsonvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT bensonlaurenm optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurereducesrightventriculardysfunctionincovid19patientsonvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT milasanamaria optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurereducesrightventriculardysfunctionincovid19patientsonvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT zakharybishoy optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurereducesrightventriculardysfunctionincovid19patientsonvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy |