Cargando…

Exploring the impact of selection bias in observational studies of COVID-19: a simulation study

BACKGROUND: Non-random selection of analytic subsamples could introduce selection bias in observational studies. We explored the potential presence and impact of selection in studies of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 prognosis. METHODS: We tested the association of a broad range of characteristic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Millard, Louise A C, Fernández-Sanlés, Alba, Carter, Alice R, Hughes, Rachael A, Tilling, Kate, Morris, Tim P, Major-Smith, Daniel, Griffith, Gareth J, Clayton, Gemma L, Kawabata, Emily, Davey Smith, George, Lawlor, Deborah A, Borges, Maria Carolina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9908043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36474414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyac221
_version_ 1784884301223952384
author Millard, Louise A C
Fernández-Sanlés, Alba
Carter, Alice R
Hughes, Rachael A
Tilling, Kate
Morris, Tim P
Major-Smith, Daniel
Griffith, Gareth J
Clayton, Gemma L
Kawabata, Emily
Davey Smith, George
Lawlor, Deborah A
Borges, Maria Carolina
author_facet Millard, Louise A C
Fernández-Sanlés, Alba
Carter, Alice R
Hughes, Rachael A
Tilling, Kate
Morris, Tim P
Major-Smith, Daniel
Griffith, Gareth J
Clayton, Gemma L
Kawabata, Emily
Davey Smith, George
Lawlor, Deborah A
Borges, Maria Carolina
author_sort Millard, Louise A C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non-random selection of analytic subsamples could introduce selection bias in observational studies. We explored the potential presence and impact of selection in studies of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 prognosis. METHODS: We tested the association of a broad range of characteristics with selection into COVID-19 analytic subsamples in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) and UK Biobank (UKB). We then conducted empirical analyses and simulations to explore the potential presence, direction and magnitude of bias due to this selection (relative to our defined UK-based adult target populations) when estimating the association of body mass index (BMI) with SARS-CoV-2 infection and death-with-COVID-19. RESULTS: In both cohorts, a broad range of characteristics was related to selection, sometimes in opposite directions (e.g. more-educated people were more likely to have data on SARS-CoV-2 infection in ALSPAC, but less likely in UKB). Higher BMI was associated with higher odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection and death-with-COVID-19. We found non-negligible bias in many simulated scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses using COVID-19 self-reported or national registry data may be biased due to selection. The magnitude and direction of this bias depend on the outcome definition, the true effect of the risk factor and the assumed selection mechanism; these are likely to differ between studies with different target populations. Bias due to sample selection is a key concern in COVID-19 research based on national registry data, especially as countries end free mass testing. The framework we have used can be applied by other researchers assessing the extent to which their results may be biased for their research question of interest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9908043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99080432023-02-09 Exploring the impact of selection bias in observational studies of COVID-19: a simulation study Millard, Louise A C Fernández-Sanlés, Alba Carter, Alice R Hughes, Rachael A Tilling, Kate Morris, Tim P Major-Smith, Daniel Griffith, Gareth J Clayton, Gemma L Kawabata, Emily Davey Smith, George Lawlor, Deborah A Borges, Maria Carolina Int J Epidemiol Covid-19 BACKGROUND: Non-random selection of analytic subsamples could introduce selection bias in observational studies. We explored the potential presence and impact of selection in studies of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 prognosis. METHODS: We tested the association of a broad range of characteristics with selection into COVID-19 analytic subsamples in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) and UK Biobank (UKB). We then conducted empirical analyses and simulations to explore the potential presence, direction and magnitude of bias due to this selection (relative to our defined UK-based adult target populations) when estimating the association of body mass index (BMI) with SARS-CoV-2 infection and death-with-COVID-19. RESULTS: In both cohorts, a broad range of characteristics was related to selection, sometimes in opposite directions (e.g. more-educated people were more likely to have data on SARS-CoV-2 infection in ALSPAC, but less likely in UKB). Higher BMI was associated with higher odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection and death-with-COVID-19. We found non-negligible bias in many simulated scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses using COVID-19 self-reported or national registry data may be biased due to selection. The magnitude and direction of this bias depend on the outcome definition, the true effect of the risk factor and the assumed selection mechanism; these are likely to differ between studies with different target populations. Bias due to sample selection is a key concern in COVID-19 research based on national registry data, especially as countries end free mass testing. The framework we have used can be applied by other researchers assessing the extent to which their results may be biased for their research question of interest. Oxford University Press 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9908043/ /pubmed/36474414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyac221 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Covid-19
Millard, Louise A C
Fernández-Sanlés, Alba
Carter, Alice R
Hughes, Rachael A
Tilling, Kate
Morris, Tim P
Major-Smith, Daniel
Griffith, Gareth J
Clayton, Gemma L
Kawabata, Emily
Davey Smith, George
Lawlor, Deborah A
Borges, Maria Carolina
Exploring the impact of selection bias in observational studies of COVID-19: a simulation study
title Exploring the impact of selection bias in observational studies of COVID-19: a simulation study
title_full Exploring the impact of selection bias in observational studies of COVID-19: a simulation study
title_fullStr Exploring the impact of selection bias in observational studies of COVID-19: a simulation study
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the impact of selection bias in observational studies of COVID-19: a simulation study
title_short Exploring the impact of selection bias in observational studies of COVID-19: a simulation study
title_sort exploring the impact of selection bias in observational studies of covid-19: a simulation study
topic Covid-19
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9908043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36474414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyac221
work_keys_str_mv AT millardlouiseac exploringtheimpactofselectionbiasinobservationalstudiesofcovid19asimulationstudy
AT fernandezsanlesalba exploringtheimpactofselectionbiasinobservationalstudiesofcovid19asimulationstudy
AT carteralicer exploringtheimpactofselectionbiasinobservationalstudiesofcovid19asimulationstudy
AT hughesrachaela exploringtheimpactofselectionbiasinobservationalstudiesofcovid19asimulationstudy
AT tillingkate exploringtheimpactofselectionbiasinobservationalstudiesofcovid19asimulationstudy
AT morristimp exploringtheimpactofselectionbiasinobservationalstudiesofcovid19asimulationstudy
AT majorsmithdaniel exploringtheimpactofselectionbiasinobservationalstudiesofcovid19asimulationstudy
AT griffithgarethj exploringtheimpactofselectionbiasinobservationalstudiesofcovid19asimulationstudy
AT claytongemmal exploringtheimpactofselectionbiasinobservationalstudiesofcovid19asimulationstudy
AT kawabataemily exploringtheimpactofselectionbiasinobservationalstudiesofcovid19asimulationstudy
AT daveysmithgeorge exploringtheimpactofselectionbiasinobservationalstudiesofcovid19asimulationstudy
AT lawlordeboraha exploringtheimpactofselectionbiasinobservationalstudiesofcovid19asimulationstudy
AT borgesmariacarolina exploringtheimpactofselectionbiasinobservationalstudiesofcovid19asimulationstudy