Cargando…
Tools for assessing quality and risk of bias in Mendelian randomization studies: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: The use of Mendelian randomization (MR) in epidemiology has increased considerably in recent years, with a subsequent increase in systematic reviews of MR studies. We conducted a systematic review of tools designed for assessing risk of bias and/or quality of evidence in MR studies and a...
Autores principales: | Spiga, Francesca, Gibson, Mark, Dawson, Sarah, Tilling, Kate, Davey Smith, George, Munafò, Marcus R, Higgins, Julian P T |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9908059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35900265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyac149 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Bias in two-sample Mendelian randomization when using heritable covariable-adjusted summary associations
por: Hartwig, Fernando Pires, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Collider scope: when selection bias can substantially influence observed associations
por: Munafò, Marcus R, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Interpretation of Mendelian randomization using a single measure of an exposure that varies over time
por: Morris, Tim T, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Exploring and mitigating potential bias when genetic instrumental variables are associated with multiple non-exposure traits in Mendelian randomization
por: Yang, Qian, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Using allele scores to identify confounding by reverse causation: studies of alcohol consumption as an exemplar
por: Sallis, Hannah M, et al.
Publicado: (2022)