Cargando…

Nonoperative versus operative management of frail institutionalized older patients with a proximal femoral fracture: a cost-utility analysis alongside a multicenter prospective cohort study

SUMMARY: Hip fractures are associated with significant healthcare costs. In frail institutionalized patients, the costs of nonoperative management are less than operative management with comparable short-term quality of life. Nonoperative management of hip fractures in patients at the end of life sh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loggers, S. A. I., Geraerds, A. J. L. M., Joosse, P., Willems, H. C., Gosens, T., Van Balen, R., Van de Ree, C.L. P., Ponsen, K. J., Steens, J., Zuurmond, R. G., Verhofstad, M. H. J., Polinder, S., Van Lieshout, Esther M. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9908658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36609506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-022-06638-x
_version_ 1784884411991326720
author Loggers, S. A. I.
Geraerds, A. J. L. M.
Joosse, P.
Willems, H. C.
Gosens, T.
Van Balen, R.
Van de Ree, C.L. P.
Ponsen, K. J.
Steens, J.
Zuurmond, R. G.
Verhofstad, M. H. J.
Polinder, S.
Van Lieshout, Esther M. M.
author_facet Loggers, S. A. I.
Geraerds, A. J. L. M.
Joosse, P.
Willems, H. C.
Gosens, T.
Van Balen, R.
Van de Ree, C.L. P.
Ponsen, K. J.
Steens, J.
Zuurmond, R. G.
Verhofstad, M. H. J.
Polinder, S.
Van Lieshout, Esther M. M.
author_sort Loggers, S. A. I.
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: Hip fractures are associated with significant healthcare costs. In frail institutionalized patients, the costs of nonoperative management are less than operative management with comparable short-term quality of life. Nonoperative management of hip fractures in patients at the end of life should be openly discussed with SDM. PURPOSE: The aim was to describe healthcare use with associated costs and to determine cost-utility of nonoperative management (NOM) versus operative management (OM) of frail institutionalized older patients with a proximal femoral fracture. METHODS: This study included institutionalized patients with a limited life expectancy aged ≥ 70 years who sustained a proximal femoral fracture in the Netherlands. Costs of hospital- and nursing home care were calculated. Quality adjusted life years (QALY) were calculated based on EuroQol-5D-5L utility scores at day 7, 14, and 30 and at 3 and 6 months. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated from a societal perspective. RESULTS: Of the 172 enrolled patients, 88 (51%) patients opted for NOM and 84 (49%) for OM. NOM was associated with lower healthcare costs at 6 months (NOM; €2425 (SD 1.030), OM; €9325 (SD 4242), p < 0.001). The main cost driver was hospital stay (NOM; €738 (SD 841) and OM; €3140 (SD 2636)). The ICER per QALY gained in the OM versus NOM was €76,912 and exceeded the threshold of €20,000 per QALY. The gained QALY were minimal in the OM group in patients who died within 14- and 30-day post-injury, but OM resulted in more than triple the costs. CONCLUSION: OM results in significant higher healthcare costs, mainly due to the length of hospital stay. For frail patients at the end of life, NOM of proximal femoral fractures should be openly discussed in SDM conversations due to the limited gain in QoL. Trial registration. Netherlands Trial Register (NTR7245; date 10–06-2018). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00198-022-06638-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9908658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99086582023-02-10 Nonoperative versus operative management of frail institutionalized older patients with a proximal femoral fracture: a cost-utility analysis alongside a multicenter prospective cohort study Loggers, S. A. I. Geraerds, A. J. L. M. Joosse, P. Willems, H. C. Gosens, T. Van Balen, R. Van de Ree, C.L. P. Ponsen, K. J. Steens, J. Zuurmond, R. G. Verhofstad, M. H. J. Polinder, S. Van Lieshout, Esther M. M. Osteoporos Int Original Article SUMMARY: Hip fractures are associated with significant healthcare costs. In frail institutionalized patients, the costs of nonoperative management are less than operative management with comparable short-term quality of life. Nonoperative management of hip fractures in patients at the end of life should be openly discussed with SDM. PURPOSE: The aim was to describe healthcare use with associated costs and to determine cost-utility of nonoperative management (NOM) versus operative management (OM) of frail institutionalized older patients with a proximal femoral fracture. METHODS: This study included institutionalized patients with a limited life expectancy aged ≥ 70 years who sustained a proximal femoral fracture in the Netherlands. Costs of hospital- and nursing home care were calculated. Quality adjusted life years (QALY) were calculated based on EuroQol-5D-5L utility scores at day 7, 14, and 30 and at 3 and 6 months. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated from a societal perspective. RESULTS: Of the 172 enrolled patients, 88 (51%) patients opted for NOM and 84 (49%) for OM. NOM was associated with lower healthcare costs at 6 months (NOM; €2425 (SD 1.030), OM; €9325 (SD 4242), p < 0.001). The main cost driver was hospital stay (NOM; €738 (SD 841) and OM; €3140 (SD 2636)). The ICER per QALY gained in the OM versus NOM was €76,912 and exceeded the threshold of €20,000 per QALY. The gained QALY were minimal in the OM group in patients who died within 14- and 30-day post-injury, but OM resulted in more than triple the costs. CONCLUSION: OM results in significant higher healthcare costs, mainly due to the length of hospital stay. For frail patients at the end of life, NOM of proximal femoral fractures should be openly discussed in SDM conversations due to the limited gain in QoL. Trial registration. Netherlands Trial Register (NTR7245; date 10–06-2018). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00198-022-06638-x. Springer London 2023-01-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9908658/ /pubmed/36609506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-022-06638-x Text en © Authors 2022, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Loggers, S. A. I.
Geraerds, A. J. L. M.
Joosse, P.
Willems, H. C.
Gosens, T.
Van Balen, R.
Van de Ree, C.L. P.
Ponsen, K. J.
Steens, J.
Zuurmond, R. G.
Verhofstad, M. H. J.
Polinder, S.
Van Lieshout, Esther M. M.
Nonoperative versus operative management of frail institutionalized older patients with a proximal femoral fracture: a cost-utility analysis alongside a multicenter prospective cohort study
title Nonoperative versus operative management of frail institutionalized older patients with a proximal femoral fracture: a cost-utility analysis alongside a multicenter prospective cohort study
title_full Nonoperative versus operative management of frail institutionalized older patients with a proximal femoral fracture: a cost-utility analysis alongside a multicenter prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Nonoperative versus operative management of frail institutionalized older patients with a proximal femoral fracture: a cost-utility analysis alongside a multicenter prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Nonoperative versus operative management of frail institutionalized older patients with a proximal femoral fracture: a cost-utility analysis alongside a multicenter prospective cohort study
title_short Nonoperative versus operative management of frail institutionalized older patients with a proximal femoral fracture: a cost-utility analysis alongside a multicenter prospective cohort study
title_sort nonoperative versus operative management of frail institutionalized older patients with a proximal femoral fracture: a cost-utility analysis alongside a multicenter prospective cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9908658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36609506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-022-06638-x
work_keys_str_mv AT loggerssai nonoperativeversusoperativemanagementoffrailinstitutionalizedolderpatientswithaproximalfemoralfractureacostutilityanalysisalongsideamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT geraerdsajlm nonoperativeversusoperativemanagementoffrailinstitutionalizedolderpatientswithaproximalfemoralfractureacostutilityanalysisalongsideamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT joossep nonoperativeversusoperativemanagementoffrailinstitutionalizedolderpatientswithaproximalfemoralfractureacostutilityanalysisalongsideamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT willemshc nonoperativeversusoperativemanagementoffrailinstitutionalizedolderpatientswithaproximalfemoralfractureacostutilityanalysisalongsideamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT gosenst nonoperativeversusoperativemanagementoffrailinstitutionalizedolderpatientswithaproximalfemoralfractureacostutilityanalysisalongsideamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT vanbalenr nonoperativeversusoperativemanagementoffrailinstitutionalizedolderpatientswithaproximalfemoralfractureacostutilityanalysisalongsideamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT vandereeclp nonoperativeversusoperativemanagementoffrailinstitutionalizedolderpatientswithaproximalfemoralfractureacostutilityanalysisalongsideamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT ponsenkj nonoperativeversusoperativemanagementoffrailinstitutionalizedolderpatientswithaproximalfemoralfractureacostutilityanalysisalongsideamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT steensj nonoperativeversusoperativemanagementoffrailinstitutionalizedolderpatientswithaproximalfemoralfractureacostutilityanalysisalongsideamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT zuurmondrg nonoperativeversusoperativemanagementoffrailinstitutionalizedolderpatientswithaproximalfemoralfractureacostutilityanalysisalongsideamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT verhofstadmhj nonoperativeversusoperativemanagementoffrailinstitutionalizedolderpatientswithaproximalfemoralfractureacostutilityanalysisalongsideamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT polinders nonoperativeversusoperativemanagementoffrailinstitutionalizedolderpatientswithaproximalfemoralfractureacostutilityanalysisalongsideamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT vanlieshoutesthermm nonoperativeversusoperativemanagementoffrailinstitutionalizedolderpatientswithaproximalfemoralfractureacostutilityanalysisalongsideamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT nonoperativeversusoperativemanagementoffrailinstitutionalizedolderpatientswithaproximalfemoralfractureacostutilityanalysisalongsideamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy