Cargando…
Diagnostic instruments for the assessment of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder: a systematic review of the literature
Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD) involves non-episodic irritability and frequent severe temper outbursts in children. Since the inclusion of the diagnosis in the DSM-5, there is no established gold-standard in the assessment of DMDD. In this systematic review of the literature, we provi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9908712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34232390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01840-4 |
_version_ | 1784884422106939392 |
---|---|
author | Mürner-Lavanchy, Ines Kaess, Michael Koenig, Julian |
author_facet | Mürner-Lavanchy, Ines Kaess, Michael Koenig, Julian |
author_sort | Mürner-Lavanchy, Ines |
collection | PubMed |
description | Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD) involves non-episodic irritability and frequent severe temper outbursts in children. Since the inclusion of the diagnosis in the DSM-5, there is no established gold-standard in the assessment of DMDD. In this systematic review of the literature, we provide a synopsis of existing diagnostic instruments for DMDD. Bibliographic databases were searched for any studies assessing DMDD. The systematic search of the literature yielded K = 1167 hits, of which n = 110 studies were included. The most frequently used measure was the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia DMDD module (25%). Other studies derived diagnostic criteria from interviews not specifically designed to measure DMDD (47%), chart review (7%), clinical diagnosis without any specific instrument (6%) or did not provide information about the assessment (9%). Three structured interviews designed to diagnose DMDD were used in six studies (6%). Interrater reliability was reported in 36% of studies (ranging from κ = 0.6–1) while other psychometric properties were rarely reported. This systematic review points to a variety of existing diagnostic measures for DMDD with good reliability. Consistent reporting of psychometric properties of recently developed DMDD interviews, as well as their further refinement, may help to ascertain the validity of the diagnosis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00787-021-01840-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9908712 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99087122023-02-10 Diagnostic instruments for the assessment of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder: a systematic review of the literature Mürner-Lavanchy, Ines Kaess, Michael Koenig, Julian Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Review Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD) involves non-episodic irritability and frequent severe temper outbursts in children. Since the inclusion of the diagnosis in the DSM-5, there is no established gold-standard in the assessment of DMDD. In this systematic review of the literature, we provide a synopsis of existing diagnostic instruments for DMDD. Bibliographic databases were searched for any studies assessing DMDD. The systematic search of the literature yielded K = 1167 hits, of which n = 110 studies were included. The most frequently used measure was the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia DMDD module (25%). Other studies derived diagnostic criteria from interviews not specifically designed to measure DMDD (47%), chart review (7%), clinical diagnosis without any specific instrument (6%) or did not provide information about the assessment (9%). Three structured interviews designed to diagnose DMDD were used in six studies (6%). Interrater reliability was reported in 36% of studies (ranging from κ = 0.6–1) while other psychometric properties were rarely reported. This systematic review points to a variety of existing diagnostic measures for DMDD with good reliability. Consistent reporting of psychometric properties of recently developed DMDD interviews, as well as their further refinement, may help to ascertain the validity of the diagnosis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00787-021-01840-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-07-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9908712/ /pubmed/34232390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01840-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Mürner-Lavanchy, Ines Kaess, Michael Koenig, Julian Diagnostic instruments for the assessment of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder: a systematic review of the literature |
title | Diagnostic instruments for the assessment of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder: a systematic review of the literature |
title_full | Diagnostic instruments for the assessment of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder: a systematic review of the literature |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic instruments for the assessment of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder: a systematic review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic instruments for the assessment of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder: a systematic review of the literature |
title_short | Diagnostic instruments for the assessment of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder: a systematic review of the literature |
title_sort | diagnostic instruments for the assessment of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder: a systematic review of the literature |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9908712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34232390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01840-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murnerlavanchyines diagnosticinstrumentsfortheassessmentofdisruptivemooddysregulationdisorderasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT kaessmichael diagnosticinstrumentsfortheassessmentofdisruptivemooddysregulationdisorderasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT koenigjulian diagnosticinstrumentsfortheassessmentofdisruptivemooddysregulationdisorderasystematicreviewoftheliterature |