Cargando…

Biofeedback EMG alternative therapy for chronic low back pain (the BEAT-pain study)

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and potential effectiveness of an 8-week virtual EMG biofeedback intervention for patients with CLBP. METHODS: Patients with CLBP completed validated baseline and post-intervention assessments of pain intensity and interference (Brief Pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lazaridou, Asimina, Paschali, Myrella, Vilsmark, Eric S, Sadora, Jason, Burton, Dustin, Bashara, Annie, Edwards, Robert R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231154386
_version_ 1784884487808614400
author Lazaridou, Asimina
Paschali, Myrella
Vilsmark, Eric S
Sadora, Jason
Burton, Dustin
Bashara, Annie
Edwards, Robert R
author_facet Lazaridou, Asimina
Paschali, Myrella
Vilsmark, Eric S
Sadora, Jason
Burton, Dustin
Bashara, Annie
Edwards, Robert R
author_sort Lazaridou, Asimina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and potential effectiveness of an 8-week virtual EMG biofeedback intervention for patients with CLBP. METHODS: Patients with CLBP completed validated baseline and post-intervention assessments of pain intensity and interference (Brief Pain Inventory), back pain-related disability (Oswestry Disability Index), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Participants underwent a series of Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) procedures assessing responses to mechanical stimuli during two separate visits (baseline and post-intervention). In addition, we assessed, using surface EMG, the muscle tension in the trapezius, latissimus, and low back muscles at each session. Patients were randomized into the EMG biofeedback intervention or usual care group. Factorial analysis of variance including the interaction between treatment group and time was used to analyze the changes in pain intensity (primary outcome), pain interference, disability (secondary outcomes), anxiety, and depression (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: Compared to the treatment as usual comparison group, patients in the EMG biofeedback group reported lower pain intensity after completing the intervention (mean group difference 0.9, 95% CI −1.07, −0.32; p≤0.01). Compared to baseline, participants in the EMG biofeedback group demonstrated statistically significant reductions in pain interference (mean difference 1.3, 95% CI 0.42, 2.1; p≤0.01), disability (mean difference 4.32, 95% CI 1.2, 7.3; p≤0.01), and significant increases in low back pain thresholds (mean difference 0.5, 95% CI −0.87, −0.05; p≤0.01), assessed by QST. However, no significant group by time effects were observed for secondary outcomes: pain interference, disability, and low back pain thresholds. In addition, significant changes were observed in muscle tension for the trapezius, latissimus, and low back muscles in the EMG biofeedback group (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Virtual EMG biofeedback shows promise as a potential therapy for reducing pain and disability in individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9909059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99090592023-02-10 Biofeedback EMG alternative therapy for chronic low back pain (the BEAT-pain study) Lazaridou, Asimina Paschali, Myrella Vilsmark, Eric S Sadora, Jason Burton, Dustin Bashara, Annie Edwards, Robert R Digit Health Original Research OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and potential effectiveness of an 8-week virtual EMG biofeedback intervention for patients with CLBP. METHODS: Patients with CLBP completed validated baseline and post-intervention assessments of pain intensity and interference (Brief Pain Inventory), back pain-related disability (Oswestry Disability Index), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Participants underwent a series of Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) procedures assessing responses to mechanical stimuli during two separate visits (baseline and post-intervention). In addition, we assessed, using surface EMG, the muscle tension in the trapezius, latissimus, and low back muscles at each session. Patients were randomized into the EMG biofeedback intervention or usual care group. Factorial analysis of variance including the interaction between treatment group and time was used to analyze the changes in pain intensity (primary outcome), pain interference, disability (secondary outcomes), anxiety, and depression (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: Compared to the treatment as usual comparison group, patients in the EMG biofeedback group reported lower pain intensity after completing the intervention (mean group difference 0.9, 95% CI −1.07, −0.32; p≤0.01). Compared to baseline, participants in the EMG biofeedback group demonstrated statistically significant reductions in pain interference (mean difference 1.3, 95% CI 0.42, 2.1; p≤0.01), disability (mean difference 4.32, 95% CI 1.2, 7.3; p≤0.01), and significant increases in low back pain thresholds (mean difference 0.5, 95% CI −0.87, −0.05; p≤0.01), assessed by QST. However, no significant group by time effects were observed for secondary outcomes: pain interference, disability, and low back pain thresholds. In addition, significant changes were observed in muscle tension for the trapezius, latissimus, and low back muscles in the EMG biofeedback group (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Virtual EMG biofeedback shows promise as a potential therapy for reducing pain and disability in individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain. SAGE Publications 2023-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9909059/ /pubmed/36776410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231154386 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Lazaridou, Asimina
Paschali, Myrella
Vilsmark, Eric S
Sadora, Jason
Burton, Dustin
Bashara, Annie
Edwards, Robert R
Biofeedback EMG alternative therapy for chronic low back pain (the BEAT-pain study)
title Biofeedback EMG alternative therapy for chronic low back pain (the BEAT-pain study)
title_full Biofeedback EMG alternative therapy for chronic low back pain (the BEAT-pain study)
title_fullStr Biofeedback EMG alternative therapy for chronic low back pain (the BEAT-pain study)
title_full_unstemmed Biofeedback EMG alternative therapy for chronic low back pain (the BEAT-pain study)
title_short Biofeedback EMG alternative therapy for chronic low back pain (the BEAT-pain study)
title_sort biofeedback emg alternative therapy for chronic low back pain (the beat-pain study)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231154386
work_keys_str_mv AT lazaridouasimina biofeedbackemgalternativetherapyforchroniclowbackpainthebeatpainstudy
AT paschalimyrella biofeedbackemgalternativetherapyforchroniclowbackpainthebeatpainstudy
AT vilsmarkerics biofeedbackemgalternativetherapyforchroniclowbackpainthebeatpainstudy
AT sadorajason biofeedbackemgalternativetherapyforchroniclowbackpainthebeatpainstudy
AT burtondustin biofeedbackemgalternativetherapyforchroniclowbackpainthebeatpainstudy
AT basharaannie biofeedbackemgalternativetherapyforchroniclowbackpainthebeatpainstudy
AT edwardsrobertr biofeedbackemgalternativetherapyforchroniclowbackpainthebeatpainstudy