Cargando…
Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Dual Plating for Proximal Humerus Fractures
Introduction Proximal humerus fractures account for approximately 4%-5% of all fractures. It accounts for approximately 45% of all humeral fractures. Proximal humerus fractures which are mostly stable or minimally displaced fractures are usually managed non-operatively with good outcomes. Displaced...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36779128 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33570 |
Sumario: | Introduction Proximal humerus fractures account for approximately 4%-5% of all fractures. It accounts for approximately 45% of all humeral fractures. Proximal humerus fractures which are mostly stable or minimally displaced fractures are usually managed non-operatively with good outcomes. Displaced or unstable fractures may require reduction and stabilization. For proximal humerus fractures, conservative treatments often result in stiffness and malunion of the shoulder. In comminuted proximal humerus fractures the use of a proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) only does not provide the required stable fixation which usually leads to complications such as varus collapse, malunion, anterior-posterior angulation, screw cutout, metal failure and nonunion and thus open reduction and internal fixation with dual plating are recommended for proximal humerus fractures. Material and methods The Institutional Ethics Committee of Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth in Pune approved this prospective study. We included a sample size of 52 patients and conducted a study on these patients who were admitted under the Orthopedics department at Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College and Hospital, Pune. Results In this study, 52 patients were treated with dual plating for proximal humerus fracture, an additional plate is used along with PHILOS. In our study, the majority of the study population belonged to > 50 years (34.6%), followed by 41-50 years (26.9%), 31-40 years (23.1%), and 21-30 years (15.4%). The mean age of the patient was 53.7 years including 33 male and 19 female patients. The majority of the patient in the study included was with RTA 40 patients and 12 patients with a history of falls from height. The fracture was classified using Neers classification, Neer type 2 fracture (23.1%), Neer type 3 fracture (46.2%), and Neer type 4 fracture (30.7%). In the current study, the mean DASH score at Baseline was 58.88±6.29, at three months was 36.23±5.05 and at six months was 31.85±4.16. The mean DASH score decreased significantly from baseline to three months to 6 months. As per the Paavolainen method, it was good among 40 (76.9%) and fair among 10 (19.2%), and poor among two (3.8%) cases. Out of 52 patients, we found varus collapse in immediate postop x-ray in two patient and screw protrusion in the glenohumeral joint in one patient. Conclusion Satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes were noted. This dual mechanism prevents varus displacement of the proximal fragment, and as a result, it provides a good functional outcome with dual plates in proximal humerus fractures. |
---|