Cargando…

How to improve the clinical outcome of round spermatid injection (ROSI) into the oocyte: Correction of epigenetic abnormalities

BACKGROUND: First successful human round spermatid injection (ROSI) was conducted by Tesarik et al. in 1996 for the sole treatment of nonobstructive azoospermic men whose most advanced spermatogenic cells were elongating round spermatids. Nine offsprings from ROSI were reported between 1996 and 2000...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanaka, Atsushi, Watanabe, Seiji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36789269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12503
_version_ 1784884564892581888
author Tanaka, Atsushi
Watanabe, Seiji
author_facet Tanaka, Atsushi
Watanabe, Seiji
author_sort Tanaka, Atsushi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: First successful human round spermatid injection (ROSI) was conducted by Tesarik et al. in 1996 for the sole treatment of nonobstructive azoospermic men whose most advanced spermatogenic cells were elongating round spermatids. Nine offsprings from ROSI were reported between 1996 and 2000. No successful deliveries were reported for 15 years after that. Tanaka et al. reported 90 babies born after ROSI and their follow‐up studies in 2015 and 2018 showed no significant differences in comparison with those born after natural conception in terms of physical and cognitive abilities. However, clinical outcomes remain low. METHOD: Clinical and laboratory data of successful cases in the precursor ROSI groups and those of Tanaka et al. were reviewed. RESULTS: Differences were found between the two groups in terms of identification of characteristics of round spermatid and oocyte activation. Additionally, epigenetic abnormalities were identified as underlying causes for poor ROSI results, besides correct identification of round spermatid and adequate oocyte activation. Correction of epigenetic errors could lead to optimal embryonic development. CONCLUSION: Correction of epigenetic abnormalities has a probability to improve the clinical outcome of ROSI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9909386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99093862023-02-13 How to improve the clinical outcome of round spermatid injection (ROSI) into the oocyte: Correction of epigenetic abnormalities Tanaka, Atsushi Watanabe, Seiji Reprod Med Biol Reviews BACKGROUND: First successful human round spermatid injection (ROSI) was conducted by Tesarik et al. in 1996 for the sole treatment of nonobstructive azoospermic men whose most advanced spermatogenic cells were elongating round spermatids. Nine offsprings from ROSI were reported between 1996 and 2000. No successful deliveries were reported for 15 years after that. Tanaka et al. reported 90 babies born after ROSI and their follow‐up studies in 2015 and 2018 showed no significant differences in comparison with those born after natural conception in terms of physical and cognitive abilities. However, clinical outcomes remain low. METHOD: Clinical and laboratory data of successful cases in the precursor ROSI groups and those of Tanaka et al. were reviewed. RESULTS: Differences were found between the two groups in terms of identification of characteristics of round spermatid and oocyte activation. Additionally, epigenetic abnormalities were identified as underlying causes for poor ROSI results, besides correct identification of round spermatid and adequate oocyte activation. Correction of epigenetic errors could lead to optimal embryonic development. CONCLUSION: Correction of epigenetic abnormalities has a probability to improve the clinical outcome of ROSI. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9909386/ /pubmed/36789269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12503 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Reviews
Tanaka, Atsushi
Watanabe, Seiji
How to improve the clinical outcome of round spermatid injection (ROSI) into the oocyte: Correction of epigenetic abnormalities
title How to improve the clinical outcome of round spermatid injection (ROSI) into the oocyte: Correction of epigenetic abnormalities
title_full How to improve the clinical outcome of round spermatid injection (ROSI) into the oocyte: Correction of epigenetic abnormalities
title_fullStr How to improve the clinical outcome of round spermatid injection (ROSI) into the oocyte: Correction of epigenetic abnormalities
title_full_unstemmed How to improve the clinical outcome of round spermatid injection (ROSI) into the oocyte: Correction of epigenetic abnormalities
title_short How to improve the clinical outcome of round spermatid injection (ROSI) into the oocyte: Correction of epigenetic abnormalities
title_sort how to improve the clinical outcome of round spermatid injection (rosi) into the oocyte: correction of epigenetic abnormalities
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36789269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12503
work_keys_str_mv AT tanakaatsushi howtoimprovetheclinicaloutcomeofroundspermatidinjectionrosiintotheoocytecorrectionofepigeneticabnormalities
AT watanabeseiji howtoimprovetheclinicaloutcomeofroundspermatidinjectionrosiintotheoocytecorrectionofepigeneticabnormalities