Cargando…

Optimizing the mnemonic similarity task for efficient, widespread use

Introduction: The Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST) has become a popular test of memory and, in particular, of hippocampal function. It has been heavily used in research settings and is currently included as an alternate outcome measure on a number of clinical trials. However, as it typically requires...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stark, Craig E. L., Noche, Jessica A., Ebersberger, Jarrett R., Mayer, Lizabeth, Stark, Shauna M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778130
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1080366
_version_ 1784884609342767104
author Stark, Craig E. L.
Noche, Jessica A.
Ebersberger, Jarrett R.
Mayer, Lizabeth
Stark, Shauna M.
author_facet Stark, Craig E. L.
Noche, Jessica A.
Ebersberger, Jarrett R.
Mayer, Lizabeth
Stark, Shauna M.
author_sort Stark, Craig E. L.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST) has become a popular test of memory and, in particular, of hippocampal function. It has been heavily used in research settings and is currently included as an alternate outcome measure on a number of clinical trials. However, as it typically requires ~15 min to administer and benefits substantially from an experienced test administrator to ensure the instructions are well-understood, its use in trials and in other settings is somewhat restricted. Several different variants of the MST are in common use that alter the task format (study-test vs. continuous) and the response prompt given to participants (old/similar/new vs. old/new). Methods: In eight online experiments, we sought to address three main goals: (1) To determine whether a robust version of the task could be created that could be conducted in half the traditional time; (2) To determine whether the test format or response prompt choice significantly impacted the MST’s results; and (3) To determine how robust the MST is to repeat testing. In Experiments 1–7, participants received both the traditional and alternate forms of the MST to determine how well the alternate version captured the traditional task’s performance. In Experiment 8, participants were given the MST four times over approximately 4 weeks. Results: In Experiments 1–7, we found that test format had no effect on the reliability of the MST, but that shifting to the two-choice response format significantly reduced its ability to reflect the traditional MST’s score. We also found that the full running time could be cut it half or less without appreciable reduction in reliability. We confirmed the efficacy of this reduced task in older adults as well. Here, and in Experiment 8, we found that while there often are no effects of repeat-testing, small effects are possible, but appear limited to the initial testing session. Discussion: The optimized version of the task developed here (oMST) is freely available for web-based experiment delivery and provides an accurate estimate of the same memory ability as the classic MST in less than half the time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9909607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99096072023-02-10 Optimizing the mnemonic similarity task for efficient, widespread use Stark, Craig E. L. Noche, Jessica A. Ebersberger, Jarrett R. Mayer, Lizabeth Stark, Shauna M. Front Behav Neurosci Behavioral Neuroscience Introduction: The Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST) has become a popular test of memory and, in particular, of hippocampal function. It has been heavily used in research settings and is currently included as an alternate outcome measure on a number of clinical trials. However, as it typically requires ~15 min to administer and benefits substantially from an experienced test administrator to ensure the instructions are well-understood, its use in trials and in other settings is somewhat restricted. Several different variants of the MST are in common use that alter the task format (study-test vs. continuous) and the response prompt given to participants (old/similar/new vs. old/new). Methods: In eight online experiments, we sought to address three main goals: (1) To determine whether a robust version of the task could be created that could be conducted in half the traditional time; (2) To determine whether the test format or response prompt choice significantly impacted the MST’s results; and (3) To determine how robust the MST is to repeat testing. In Experiments 1–7, participants received both the traditional and alternate forms of the MST to determine how well the alternate version captured the traditional task’s performance. In Experiment 8, participants were given the MST four times over approximately 4 weeks. Results: In Experiments 1–7, we found that test format had no effect on the reliability of the MST, but that shifting to the two-choice response format significantly reduced its ability to reflect the traditional MST’s score. We also found that the full running time could be cut it half or less without appreciable reduction in reliability. We confirmed the efficacy of this reduced task in older adults as well. Here, and in Experiment 8, we found that while there often are no effects of repeat-testing, small effects are possible, but appear limited to the initial testing session. Discussion: The optimized version of the task developed here (oMST) is freely available for web-based experiment delivery and provides an accurate estimate of the same memory ability as the classic MST in less than half the time. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9909607/ /pubmed/36778130 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1080366 Text en Copyright © 2023 Stark, Noche, Ebersberger, Mayer and Stark. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Behavioral Neuroscience
Stark, Craig E. L.
Noche, Jessica A.
Ebersberger, Jarrett R.
Mayer, Lizabeth
Stark, Shauna M.
Optimizing the mnemonic similarity task for efficient, widespread use
title Optimizing the mnemonic similarity task for efficient, widespread use
title_full Optimizing the mnemonic similarity task for efficient, widespread use
title_fullStr Optimizing the mnemonic similarity task for efficient, widespread use
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing the mnemonic similarity task for efficient, widespread use
title_short Optimizing the mnemonic similarity task for efficient, widespread use
title_sort optimizing the mnemonic similarity task for efficient, widespread use
topic Behavioral Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778130
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1080366
work_keys_str_mv AT starkcraigel optimizingthemnemonicsimilaritytaskforefficientwidespreaduse
AT nochejessicaa optimizingthemnemonicsimilaritytaskforefficientwidespreaduse
AT ebersbergerjarrettr optimizingthemnemonicsimilaritytaskforefficientwidespreaduse
AT mayerlizabeth optimizingthemnemonicsimilaritytaskforefficientwidespreaduse
AT starkshaunam optimizingthemnemonicsimilaritytaskforefficientwidespreaduse