Cargando…

Evaluating patient reported outcomes and experiences in a novel proton beam clinic – challenges, activities, and outcomes of the ProtonCare project

BACKGROUND: The ProtonCare Study Group (PCSG) was formed with the purpose to develop and implement a framework for evaluation of proton beam therapy (PBT) and the related care at a novel clinic (Skandionkliniken), based on patient reported data. METHOD: A logic model framework was used to describe t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sjövall, K, Langegård, U, Fransson, P, Nevo-Ohlsson, E, Kristensen, I, Ahlberg, K, Johansson, B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36759789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10586-y
_version_ 1784884667585921024
author Sjövall, K
Langegård, U
Fransson, P
Nevo-Ohlsson, E
Kristensen, I
Ahlberg, K
Johansson, B
author_facet Sjövall, K
Langegård, U
Fransson, P
Nevo-Ohlsson, E
Kristensen, I
Ahlberg, K
Johansson, B
author_sort Sjövall, K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ProtonCare Study Group (PCSG) was formed with the purpose to develop and implement a framework for evaluation of proton beam therapy (PBT) and the related care at a novel clinic (Skandionkliniken), based on patient reported data. METHOD: A logic model framework was used to describe the process of development and implementation of a structured plan for evaluation of PBT for all diagnoses based on patient reported data. After the mission for the project was determined, meetings with networks and stakeholders were facilitated by PCSG to identify assumptions, resources, challenges, activities, outputs, outcomes, and outcome indicators. RESULT: This paper presents the challenges and accomplishments PCSG made so far. We describe required resources, activities, and accomplished results. The long-term outcomes that were outlined as a result of the process are two; 1) Improved knowledge about health outcomes of patients that are considered for PBT and 2) The findings will serve as a base for clinical decisions when patients are referred for PBT. CONCLUSION: Using the logical model framework proved useful in planning and managing the ProtonCare project. As a result, the work of PCSG has so far resulted in long-lasting outcomes that creates a base for future evaluation of patients’ perspective in radiotherapy treatment in general and in PBT especially. Our experiences can be useful for other research groups facing similar challenges. Continuing research on patients´ perspective is a central part in ongoing and future research. Collaboration, cooperation, and coordination between research groups/networks from different disciplines are a significant part of the work aiming to determine the more precise role of PBT in future treatment options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9909877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99098772023-02-10 Evaluating patient reported outcomes and experiences in a novel proton beam clinic – challenges, activities, and outcomes of the ProtonCare project Sjövall, K Langegård, U Fransson, P Nevo-Ohlsson, E Kristensen, I Ahlberg, K Johansson, B BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: The ProtonCare Study Group (PCSG) was formed with the purpose to develop and implement a framework for evaluation of proton beam therapy (PBT) and the related care at a novel clinic (Skandionkliniken), based on patient reported data. METHOD: A logic model framework was used to describe the process of development and implementation of a structured plan for evaluation of PBT for all diagnoses based on patient reported data. After the mission for the project was determined, meetings with networks and stakeholders were facilitated by PCSG to identify assumptions, resources, challenges, activities, outputs, outcomes, and outcome indicators. RESULT: This paper presents the challenges and accomplishments PCSG made so far. We describe required resources, activities, and accomplished results. The long-term outcomes that were outlined as a result of the process are two; 1) Improved knowledge about health outcomes of patients that are considered for PBT and 2) The findings will serve as a base for clinical decisions when patients are referred for PBT. CONCLUSION: Using the logical model framework proved useful in planning and managing the ProtonCare project. As a result, the work of PCSG has so far resulted in long-lasting outcomes that creates a base for future evaluation of patients’ perspective in radiotherapy treatment in general and in PBT especially. Our experiences can be useful for other research groups facing similar challenges. Continuing research on patients´ perspective is a central part in ongoing and future research. Collaboration, cooperation, and coordination between research groups/networks from different disciplines are a significant part of the work aiming to determine the more precise role of PBT in future treatment options. BioMed Central 2023-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9909877/ /pubmed/36759789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10586-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sjövall, K
Langegård, U
Fransson, P
Nevo-Ohlsson, E
Kristensen, I
Ahlberg, K
Johansson, B
Evaluating patient reported outcomes and experiences in a novel proton beam clinic – challenges, activities, and outcomes of the ProtonCare project
title Evaluating patient reported outcomes and experiences in a novel proton beam clinic – challenges, activities, and outcomes of the ProtonCare project
title_full Evaluating patient reported outcomes and experiences in a novel proton beam clinic – challenges, activities, and outcomes of the ProtonCare project
title_fullStr Evaluating patient reported outcomes and experiences in a novel proton beam clinic – challenges, activities, and outcomes of the ProtonCare project
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating patient reported outcomes and experiences in a novel proton beam clinic – challenges, activities, and outcomes of the ProtonCare project
title_short Evaluating patient reported outcomes and experiences in a novel proton beam clinic – challenges, activities, and outcomes of the ProtonCare project
title_sort evaluating patient reported outcomes and experiences in a novel proton beam clinic – challenges, activities, and outcomes of the protoncare project
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36759789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10586-y
work_keys_str_mv AT sjovallk evaluatingpatientreportedoutcomesandexperiencesinanovelprotonbeamclinicchallengesactivitiesandoutcomesoftheprotoncareproject
AT langegardu evaluatingpatientreportedoutcomesandexperiencesinanovelprotonbeamclinicchallengesactivitiesandoutcomesoftheprotoncareproject
AT franssonp evaluatingpatientreportedoutcomesandexperiencesinanovelprotonbeamclinicchallengesactivitiesandoutcomesoftheprotoncareproject
AT nevoohlssone evaluatingpatientreportedoutcomesandexperiencesinanovelprotonbeamclinicchallengesactivitiesandoutcomesoftheprotoncareproject
AT kristenseni evaluatingpatientreportedoutcomesandexperiencesinanovelprotonbeamclinicchallengesactivitiesandoutcomesoftheprotoncareproject
AT ahlbergk evaluatingpatientreportedoutcomesandexperiencesinanovelprotonbeamclinicchallengesactivitiesandoutcomesoftheprotoncareproject
AT johanssonb evaluatingpatientreportedoutcomesandexperiencesinanovelprotonbeamclinicchallengesactivitiesandoutcomesoftheprotoncareproject