Cargando…
What matters in development and sustainment of community dementia friendly initiatives and why? A realist multiple case study
BACKGROUND: Dementia friendly communities (DFCs) are seen as key to participation of people with dementia and carers. Dementia-friendly initiatives (DFI) are important building blocks for the growth of DFCs. Therefore, it is essential to understand how DFIs are developed and sustained to secure the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36759811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15125-9 |
_version_ | 1784884678566608896 |
---|---|
author | Thijssen, Marjolein Kuijer-Siebelink, Wietske Lexis, Monique A.S. Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Maria W. G. Daniels, Ramon Graff, Maud |
author_facet | Thijssen, Marjolein Kuijer-Siebelink, Wietske Lexis, Monique A.S. Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Maria W. G. Daniels, Ramon Graff, Maud |
author_sort | Thijssen, Marjolein |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dementia friendly communities (DFCs) are seen as key to participation of people with dementia and carers. Dementia-friendly initiatives (DFI) are important building blocks for the growth of DFCs. Therefore, it is essential to understand how DFIs are developed and sustained to secure the growth of DFCs. This study identifies contextual factors and mechanisms that influence the development and sustainment of Dutch DFIs. It also explains how these contextual factors and mechanisms are interrelated and the outcomes to which they lead. METHODS: Mixed methods, namely interviews, observations, documentation and focus groups, were used for this realist multiple case study. Participants were professionals (n = 46), volunteers (n = 20), people with dementia (n = 1) and carers (n = 2) who were involved in development and sustainment of DFIs in four Dutch DFCs. RESULTS: This study revealed three middle-range program theories as final outcomes: development of a support base, collaboration, and participation in DFIs by people with dementia and carers. These theories address institutional, organisational, interpersonal and individual levels in the community that are essential in development and sustainment of DFIs. CONCLUSIONS: The development and sustainment of DFIs requires the development of a support base, collaboration, and participation in DFIs by people with dementia and their carers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-15125-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9909928 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99099282023-02-10 What matters in development and sustainment of community dementia friendly initiatives and why? A realist multiple case study Thijssen, Marjolein Kuijer-Siebelink, Wietske Lexis, Monique A.S. Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Maria W. G. Daniels, Ramon Graff, Maud BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Dementia friendly communities (DFCs) are seen as key to participation of people with dementia and carers. Dementia-friendly initiatives (DFI) are important building blocks for the growth of DFCs. Therefore, it is essential to understand how DFIs are developed and sustained to secure the growth of DFCs. This study identifies contextual factors and mechanisms that influence the development and sustainment of Dutch DFIs. It also explains how these contextual factors and mechanisms are interrelated and the outcomes to which they lead. METHODS: Mixed methods, namely interviews, observations, documentation and focus groups, were used for this realist multiple case study. Participants were professionals (n = 46), volunteers (n = 20), people with dementia (n = 1) and carers (n = 2) who were involved in development and sustainment of DFIs in four Dutch DFCs. RESULTS: This study revealed three middle-range program theories as final outcomes: development of a support base, collaboration, and participation in DFIs by people with dementia and carers. These theories address institutional, organisational, interpersonal and individual levels in the community that are essential in development and sustainment of DFIs. CONCLUSIONS: The development and sustainment of DFIs requires the development of a support base, collaboration, and participation in DFIs by people with dementia and their carers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-15125-9. BioMed Central 2023-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9909928/ /pubmed/36759811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15125-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Thijssen, Marjolein Kuijer-Siebelink, Wietske Lexis, Monique A.S. Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Maria W. G. Daniels, Ramon Graff, Maud What matters in development and sustainment of community dementia friendly initiatives and why? A realist multiple case study |
title | What matters in development and sustainment of community dementia friendly initiatives and why? A realist multiple case study |
title_full | What matters in development and sustainment of community dementia friendly initiatives and why? A realist multiple case study |
title_fullStr | What matters in development and sustainment of community dementia friendly initiatives and why? A realist multiple case study |
title_full_unstemmed | What matters in development and sustainment of community dementia friendly initiatives and why? A realist multiple case study |
title_short | What matters in development and sustainment of community dementia friendly initiatives and why? A realist multiple case study |
title_sort | what matters in development and sustainment of community dementia friendly initiatives and why? a realist multiple case study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36759811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15125-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thijssenmarjolein whatmattersindevelopmentandsustainmentofcommunitydementiafriendlyinitiativesandwhyarealistmultiplecasestudy AT kuijersiebelinkwietske whatmattersindevelopmentandsustainmentofcommunitydementiafriendlyinitiativesandwhyarealistmultiplecasestudy AT lexismoniqueas whatmattersindevelopmentandsustainmentofcommunitydementiafriendlyinitiativesandwhyarealistmultiplecasestudy AT nijhuisvandersandenmariawg whatmattersindevelopmentandsustainmentofcommunitydementiafriendlyinitiativesandwhyarealistmultiplecasestudy AT danielsramon whatmattersindevelopmentandsustainmentofcommunitydementiafriendlyinitiativesandwhyarealistmultiplecasestudy AT graffmaud whatmattersindevelopmentandsustainmentofcommunitydementiafriendlyinitiativesandwhyarealistmultiplecasestudy |