Cargando…

Pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework

In 2016, we published a conceptual framework outlining the conclusions of our work in defining pilot and feasibility studies. Since then, the CONSORT extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials has been published and there have been further developments in the pilot study landscape. In this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bond, Christine, Lancaster, Gillian A., Campbell, Mike, Chan, Claire, Eddy, Saskia, Hopewell, Sally, Mellor, Katie, Thabane, Lehana, Eldridge, Sandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36759879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01233-1
_version_ 1784884691231309824
author Bond, Christine
Lancaster, Gillian A.
Campbell, Mike
Chan, Claire
Eddy, Saskia
Hopewell, Sally
Mellor, Katie
Thabane, Lehana
Eldridge, Sandra
author_facet Bond, Christine
Lancaster, Gillian A.
Campbell, Mike
Chan, Claire
Eddy, Saskia
Hopewell, Sally
Mellor, Katie
Thabane, Lehana
Eldridge, Sandra
author_sort Bond, Christine
collection PubMed
description In 2016, we published a conceptual framework outlining the conclusions of our work in defining pilot and feasibility studies. Since then, the CONSORT extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials has been published and there have been further developments in the pilot study landscape. In this paper, we revisit and extend our framework to incorporate the various feasibility pathways open to researchers, which include internal pilot studies. We consider, with examples, when different approaches to feasibility and pilot studies are more effective and efficient, taking into account the pragmatic decisions that may need to be made. The ethical issues involved in pilot studies are discussed. We end with a consideration of the funders’ perspective in making difficult resource decisions to include feasibility work and the policy implications of these; throughout, we provide examples of the uncertainties and compromises that researchers have to navigate to make progress in the most efficient way.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9909985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99099852023-02-10 Pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework Bond, Christine Lancaster, Gillian A. Campbell, Mike Chan, Claire Eddy, Saskia Hopewell, Sally Mellor, Katie Thabane, Lehana Eldridge, Sandra Pilot Feasibility Stud Methodology In 2016, we published a conceptual framework outlining the conclusions of our work in defining pilot and feasibility studies. Since then, the CONSORT extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials has been published and there have been further developments in the pilot study landscape. In this paper, we revisit and extend our framework to incorporate the various feasibility pathways open to researchers, which include internal pilot studies. We consider, with examples, when different approaches to feasibility and pilot studies are more effective and efficient, taking into account the pragmatic decisions that may need to be made. The ethical issues involved in pilot studies are discussed. We end with a consideration of the funders’ perspective in making difficult resource decisions to include feasibility work and the policy implications of these; throughout, we provide examples of the uncertainties and compromises that researchers have to navigate to make progress in the most efficient way. BioMed Central 2023-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9909985/ /pubmed/36759879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01233-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology
Bond, Christine
Lancaster, Gillian A.
Campbell, Mike
Chan, Claire
Eddy, Saskia
Hopewell, Sally
Mellor, Katie
Thabane, Lehana
Eldridge, Sandra
Pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework
title Pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework
title_full Pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework
title_fullStr Pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework
title_full_unstemmed Pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework
title_short Pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework
title_sort pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36759879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01233-1
work_keys_str_mv AT bondchristine pilotandfeasibilitystudiesextendingtheconceptualframework
AT lancastergilliana pilotandfeasibilitystudiesextendingtheconceptualframework
AT campbellmike pilotandfeasibilitystudiesextendingtheconceptualframework
AT chanclaire pilotandfeasibilitystudiesextendingtheconceptualframework
AT eddysaskia pilotandfeasibilitystudiesextendingtheconceptualframework
AT hopewellsally pilotandfeasibilitystudiesextendingtheconceptualframework
AT mellorkatie pilotandfeasibilitystudiesextendingtheconceptualframework
AT thabanelehana pilotandfeasibilitystudiesextendingtheconceptualframework
AT eldridgesandra pilotandfeasibilitystudiesextendingtheconceptualframework