Cargando…
Pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework
In 2016, we published a conceptual framework outlining the conclusions of our work in defining pilot and feasibility studies. Since then, the CONSORT extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials has been published and there have been further developments in the pilot study landscape. In this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36759879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01233-1 |
_version_ | 1784884691231309824 |
---|---|
author | Bond, Christine Lancaster, Gillian A. Campbell, Mike Chan, Claire Eddy, Saskia Hopewell, Sally Mellor, Katie Thabane, Lehana Eldridge, Sandra |
author_facet | Bond, Christine Lancaster, Gillian A. Campbell, Mike Chan, Claire Eddy, Saskia Hopewell, Sally Mellor, Katie Thabane, Lehana Eldridge, Sandra |
author_sort | Bond, Christine |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2016, we published a conceptual framework outlining the conclusions of our work in defining pilot and feasibility studies. Since then, the CONSORT extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials has been published and there have been further developments in the pilot study landscape. In this paper, we revisit and extend our framework to incorporate the various feasibility pathways open to researchers, which include internal pilot studies. We consider, with examples, when different approaches to feasibility and pilot studies are more effective and efficient, taking into account the pragmatic decisions that may need to be made. The ethical issues involved in pilot studies are discussed. We end with a consideration of the funders’ perspective in making difficult resource decisions to include feasibility work and the policy implications of these; throughout, we provide examples of the uncertainties and compromises that researchers have to navigate to make progress in the most efficient way. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9909985 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99099852023-02-10 Pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework Bond, Christine Lancaster, Gillian A. Campbell, Mike Chan, Claire Eddy, Saskia Hopewell, Sally Mellor, Katie Thabane, Lehana Eldridge, Sandra Pilot Feasibility Stud Methodology In 2016, we published a conceptual framework outlining the conclusions of our work in defining pilot and feasibility studies. Since then, the CONSORT extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials has been published and there have been further developments in the pilot study landscape. In this paper, we revisit and extend our framework to incorporate the various feasibility pathways open to researchers, which include internal pilot studies. We consider, with examples, when different approaches to feasibility and pilot studies are more effective and efficient, taking into account the pragmatic decisions that may need to be made. The ethical issues involved in pilot studies are discussed. We end with a consideration of the funders’ perspective in making difficult resource decisions to include feasibility work and the policy implications of these; throughout, we provide examples of the uncertainties and compromises that researchers have to navigate to make progress in the most efficient way. BioMed Central 2023-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9909985/ /pubmed/36759879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01233-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Bond, Christine Lancaster, Gillian A. Campbell, Mike Chan, Claire Eddy, Saskia Hopewell, Sally Mellor, Katie Thabane, Lehana Eldridge, Sandra Pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework |
title | Pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework |
title_full | Pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework |
title_fullStr | Pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework |
title_full_unstemmed | Pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework |
title_short | Pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework |
title_sort | pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36759879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01233-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bondchristine pilotandfeasibilitystudiesextendingtheconceptualframework AT lancastergilliana pilotandfeasibilitystudiesextendingtheconceptualframework AT campbellmike pilotandfeasibilitystudiesextendingtheconceptualframework AT chanclaire pilotandfeasibilitystudiesextendingtheconceptualframework AT eddysaskia pilotandfeasibilitystudiesextendingtheconceptualframework AT hopewellsally pilotandfeasibilitystudiesextendingtheconceptualframework AT mellorkatie pilotandfeasibilitystudiesextendingtheconceptualframework AT thabanelehana pilotandfeasibilitystudiesextendingtheconceptualframework AT eldridgesandra pilotandfeasibilitystudiesextendingtheconceptualframework |