Cargando…
Assessing COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against Omicron subvariants: Report from a meeting of the World Health Organization
Emerging in November 2021, the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern exhibited marked immune evasion resulting in reduced vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic disease. Most vaccine effectiveness data on Omicron are derived from the first Omicron subvariant, BA.1, which...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36797097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.020 |
_version_ | 1784884700925394944 |
---|---|
author | Feikin, Daniel R. Higdon, Melissa M. Andrews, Nick Collie, Shirley Deloria Knoll, Maria Kwong, Jeffrey C. Link-Gelles, Ruth Pilishvili, Tamara Patel, Minal K. |
author_facet | Feikin, Daniel R. Higdon, Melissa M. Andrews, Nick Collie, Shirley Deloria Knoll, Maria Kwong, Jeffrey C. Link-Gelles, Ruth Pilishvili, Tamara Patel, Minal K. |
author_sort | Feikin, Daniel R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Emerging in November 2021, the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern exhibited marked immune evasion resulting in reduced vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic disease. Most vaccine effectiveness data on Omicron are derived from the first Omicron subvariant, BA.1, which caused large waves of infection in many parts of the world within a short period of time. BA.1, however, was replaced by BA.2 within months, and later by BA.4 and BA.5 (BA.4/5). These later Omicron subvariants exhibited additional mutations in the spike protein of the virus, leading to speculation that they might result in even lower vaccine effectiveness. To address this question, the World Health Organization hosted a virtual meeting on December 6, 2022, to review available evidence for vaccine effectiveness against the major Omicron subvariants up to that date. Data were presented from South Africa, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Canada, as well as the results of a review and meta-regression of studies that evaluated the duration of the vaccine effectiveness for multiple Omicron subvariants. Despite heterogeneity of results and wide confidence intervals in some studies, the majority of studies showed vaccine effectiveness tended to be lower against BA.2 and especially against BA.4/5, compared to BA.1, with perhaps faster waning against severe disease caused by BA.4/5 after a booster dose. The interpretation of these results was discussed and both immunological factors (i.e., more immune escape with BA.4/5) and methodological issues (e.g., biases related to differences in the timing of subvariant circulation) were possible explanations for the findings. COVID-19 vaccines still provide some protection against infection and symptomatic disease from all Omicron subvariants for at least several months, with greater and more durable protection against severe disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9910025 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99100252023-02-09 Assessing COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against Omicron subvariants: Report from a meeting of the World Health Organization Feikin, Daniel R. Higdon, Melissa M. Andrews, Nick Collie, Shirley Deloria Knoll, Maria Kwong, Jeffrey C. Link-Gelles, Ruth Pilishvili, Tamara Patel, Minal K. Vaccine WHO Report Emerging in November 2021, the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern exhibited marked immune evasion resulting in reduced vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic disease. Most vaccine effectiveness data on Omicron are derived from the first Omicron subvariant, BA.1, which caused large waves of infection in many parts of the world within a short period of time. BA.1, however, was replaced by BA.2 within months, and later by BA.4 and BA.5 (BA.4/5). These later Omicron subvariants exhibited additional mutations in the spike protein of the virus, leading to speculation that they might result in even lower vaccine effectiveness. To address this question, the World Health Organization hosted a virtual meeting on December 6, 2022, to review available evidence for vaccine effectiveness against the major Omicron subvariants up to that date. Data were presented from South Africa, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Canada, as well as the results of a review and meta-regression of studies that evaluated the duration of the vaccine effectiveness for multiple Omicron subvariants. Despite heterogeneity of results and wide confidence intervals in some studies, the majority of studies showed vaccine effectiveness tended to be lower against BA.2 and especially against BA.4/5, compared to BA.1, with perhaps faster waning against severe disease caused by BA.4/5 after a booster dose. The interpretation of these results was discussed and both immunological factors (i.e., more immune escape with BA.4/5) and methodological issues (e.g., biases related to differences in the timing of subvariant circulation) were possible explanations for the findings. COVID-19 vaccines still provide some protection against infection and symptomatic disease from all Omicron subvariants for at least several months, with greater and more durable protection against severe disease. Elsevier Ltd. 2023-03-31 2023-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9910025/ /pubmed/36797097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.020 Text en © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | WHO Report Feikin, Daniel R. Higdon, Melissa M. Andrews, Nick Collie, Shirley Deloria Knoll, Maria Kwong, Jeffrey C. Link-Gelles, Ruth Pilishvili, Tamara Patel, Minal K. Assessing COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against Omicron subvariants: Report from a meeting of the World Health Organization |
title | Assessing COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against Omicron subvariants: Report from a meeting of the World Health Organization |
title_full | Assessing COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against Omicron subvariants: Report from a meeting of the World Health Organization |
title_fullStr | Assessing COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against Omicron subvariants: Report from a meeting of the World Health Organization |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against Omicron subvariants: Report from a meeting of the World Health Organization |
title_short | Assessing COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against Omicron subvariants: Report from a meeting of the World Health Organization |
title_sort | assessing covid-19 vaccine effectiveness against omicron subvariants: report from a meeting of the world health organization |
topic | WHO Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36797097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT feikindanielr assessingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessagainstomicronsubvariantsreportfromameetingoftheworldhealthorganization AT higdonmelissam assessingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessagainstomicronsubvariantsreportfromameetingoftheworldhealthorganization AT andrewsnick assessingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessagainstomicronsubvariantsreportfromameetingoftheworldhealthorganization AT collieshirley assessingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessagainstomicronsubvariantsreportfromameetingoftheworldhealthorganization AT deloriaknollmaria assessingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessagainstomicronsubvariantsreportfromameetingoftheworldhealthorganization AT kwongjeffreyc assessingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessagainstomicronsubvariantsreportfromameetingoftheworldhealthorganization AT linkgellesruth assessingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessagainstomicronsubvariantsreportfromameetingoftheworldhealthorganization AT pilishvilitamara assessingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessagainstomicronsubvariantsreportfromameetingoftheworldhealthorganization AT patelminalk assessingcovid19vaccineeffectivenessagainstomicronsubvariantsreportfromameetingoftheworldhealthorganization |