Cargando…
An Observational Study Comparing Hybrid Transvaginal Notes and Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Background: Recently, a great interest has arisen in hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-cholecystectomy (NOTES-C). It has the potential to cause less postoperative pain and may offer better cosmesis over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). Patients and methods: A tot...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36779164 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33589 |
_version_ | 1784884702419615744 |
---|---|
author | Ansari, Asif M Kaushal, Gourav Dhillon, Kanwarjit S |
author_facet | Ansari, Asif M Kaushal, Gourav Dhillon, Kanwarjit S |
author_sort | Ansari, Asif M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Recently, a great interest has arisen in hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-cholecystectomy (NOTES-C). It has the potential to cause less postoperative pain and may offer better cosmesis over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). Patients and methods: A total of 112 females who underwent conventional cholecystectomy were compared with 108 patients of hybrid transvaginal NOTES-cholecystectomy (TV NOTES-C). We compared intraoperative factors, postoperative pain, the analgesic requirement at different intervals, duration of hospital stay, and time to return to normal activities. In addition, cosmesis and patient satisfaction were assessed at four weeks. Results: Postoperative pain and analgesic requirement were less in the hybrid TV NOTES-C group (p<0.001 at 95% CI). Hybrid TV NOTES-C patients were discharged more frequently within 12 hours (27.5% versus 1.8%; p<0.001) and returned faster (2.22 versus 4.62 days; p<0.001) to normal activities. Cosmetic results and short-term quality of life as assessed by the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) and short form-36 (SF-36) scores, respectively, were better in the hybrid TV NOTES-C group (p<0.001 at 95% CI). Conclusions: Hybrid TV NOTES-C is associated with reduced postoperative analgesic requirements, faster return to normal activities, better cosmesis, and patient satisfaction compared to conventional four-port cholecystectomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9910032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99100322023-02-10 An Observational Study Comparing Hybrid Transvaginal Notes and Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Ansari, Asif M Kaushal, Gourav Dhillon, Kanwarjit S Cureus General Surgery Background: Recently, a great interest has arisen in hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-cholecystectomy (NOTES-C). It has the potential to cause less postoperative pain and may offer better cosmesis over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). Patients and methods: A total of 112 females who underwent conventional cholecystectomy were compared with 108 patients of hybrid transvaginal NOTES-cholecystectomy (TV NOTES-C). We compared intraoperative factors, postoperative pain, the analgesic requirement at different intervals, duration of hospital stay, and time to return to normal activities. In addition, cosmesis and patient satisfaction were assessed at four weeks. Results: Postoperative pain and analgesic requirement were less in the hybrid TV NOTES-C group (p<0.001 at 95% CI). Hybrid TV NOTES-C patients were discharged more frequently within 12 hours (27.5% versus 1.8%; p<0.001) and returned faster (2.22 versus 4.62 days; p<0.001) to normal activities. Cosmetic results and short-term quality of life as assessed by the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) and short form-36 (SF-36) scores, respectively, were better in the hybrid TV NOTES-C group (p<0.001 at 95% CI). Conclusions: Hybrid TV NOTES-C is associated with reduced postoperative analgesic requirements, faster return to normal activities, better cosmesis, and patient satisfaction compared to conventional four-port cholecystectomy. Cureus 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9910032/ /pubmed/36779164 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33589 Text en Copyright © 2023, Ansari et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | General Surgery Ansari, Asif M Kaushal, Gourav Dhillon, Kanwarjit S An Observational Study Comparing Hybrid Transvaginal Notes and Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title | An Observational Study Comparing Hybrid Transvaginal Notes and Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_full | An Observational Study Comparing Hybrid Transvaginal Notes and Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_fullStr | An Observational Study Comparing Hybrid Transvaginal Notes and Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | An Observational Study Comparing Hybrid Transvaginal Notes and Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_short | An Observational Study Comparing Hybrid Transvaginal Notes and Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_sort | observational study comparing hybrid transvaginal notes and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
topic | General Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36779164 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33589 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ansariasifm anobservationalstudycomparinghybridtransvaginalnotesandfourportlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT kaushalgourav anobservationalstudycomparinghybridtransvaginalnotesandfourportlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT dhillonkanwarjits anobservationalstudycomparinghybridtransvaginalnotesandfourportlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT ansariasifm observationalstudycomparinghybridtransvaginalnotesandfourportlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT kaushalgourav observationalstudycomparinghybridtransvaginalnotesandfourportlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT dhillonkanwarjits observationalstudycomparinghybridtransvaginalnotesandfourportlaparoscopiccholecystectomy |