Cargando…

An Investigation of Organizational Correlates of Distress in Non-Clinician Biomedical Researchers in the United States

PURPOSE: Challenges ushered by the COVID-19 pandemic led to an increased focus on the mental well-being of the healthcare workforce. Despite the important contribution non-clinician biomedical researchers make to the mission of academic medical centers, the well-being of this unique population remai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boitet, Laurence M, Meese, Katherine A, Colón-López, Alejandra, Schwiebert, Lisa M, Rogers, David A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776726
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S399517
_version_ 1784884736242483200
author Boitet, Laurence M
Meese, Katherine A
Colón-López, Alejandra
Schwiebert, Lisa M
Rogers, David A
author_facet Boitet, Laurence M
Meese, Katherine A
Colón-López, Alejandra
Schwiebert, Lisa M
Rogers, David A
author_sort Boitet, Laurence M
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Challenges ushered by the COVID-19 pandemic led to an increased focus on the mental well-being of the healthcare workforce. Despite the important contribution non-clinician biomedical researchers make to the mission of academic medical centers, the well-being of this unique population remains understudied in the United States. The purpose of this study was to examine the individual and organizational correlates of distress among non-clinician biomedical researchers. METHODS: A survey was delivered to employees of a large academic medical center in the southeastern United States, including non-clinician biomedical researchers. Participants were asked to assess their own well-being using the validated Well-Being Index (WBI) tool, resilience, work and nonwork-related stressors and demographic descriptors. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were conducted, and binary logistic regression was used to examine predictors of increased odds of overall distress. RESULTS: Nearly 44% of surveyed non-clinician biomedical researchers met the threshold for high distress which indicates an increased risk of suicidal ideation, turnover intention, and burnout. The major correlates of distress were at the organizational level, including perceived organizational support (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70–0.90), heavy workload and long hours (OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.53–6.88), inability or lack of support to take time off (OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.03–7.66) and conflict with supervisor (OR 5.03, 95% CI 1.13–22.1). While lower individual resilience (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.54–0.88) was statistically significantly associated with greater distress, it accounted for less than 10% of the overall variance when controlling for other work-related factors. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that developing organizational interventions that address institutional support for non-clinician biomedical researchers within academic medical centers represents an important opportunity to reduce distress within this population. While emphasizing individual resiliency as an important in the pursuit of well-being, it is also the responsibility of the organization to create and foster an environment in which employees can access their own resilience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9910207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99102072023-02-10 An Investigation of Organizational Correlates of Distress in Non-Clinician Biomedical Researchers in the United States Boitet, Laurence M Meese, Katherine A Colón-López, Alejandra Schwiebert, Lisa M Rogers, David A J Multidiscip Healthc Original Research PURPOSE: Challenges ushered by the COVID-19 pandemic led to an increased focus on the mental well-being of the healthcare workforce. Despite the important contribution non-clinician biomedical researchers make to the mission of academic medical centers, the well-being of this unique population remains understudied in the United States. The purpose of this study was to examine the individual and organizational correlates of distress among non-clinician biomedical researchers. METHODS: A survey was delivered to employees of a large academic medical center in the southeastern United States, including non-clinician biomedical researchers. Participants were asked to assess their own well-being using the validated Well-Being Index (WBI) tool, resilience, work and nonwork-related stressors and demographic descriptors. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were conducted, and binary logistic regression was used to examine predictors of increased odds of overall distress. RESULTS: Nearly 44% of surveyed non-clinician biomedical researchers met the threshold for high distress which indicates an increased risk of suicidal ideation, turnover intention, and burnout. The major correlates of distress were at the organizational level, including perceived organizational support (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70–0.90), heavy workload and long hours (OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.53–6.88), inability or lack of support to take time off (OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.03–7.66) and conflict with supervisor (OR 5.03, 95% CI 1.13–22.1). While lower individual resilience (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.54–0.88) was statistically significantly associated with greater distress, it accounted for less than 10% of the overall variance when controlling for other work-related factors. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that developing organizational interventions that address institutional support for non-clinician biomedical researchers within academic medical centers represents an important opportunity to reduce distress within this population. While emphasizing individual resiliency as an important in the pursuit of well-being, it is also the responsibility of the organization to create and foster an environment in which employees can access their own resilience. Dove 2023-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9910207/ /pubmed/36776726 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S399517 Text en © 2023 Boitet et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Boitet, Laurence M
Meese, Katherine A
Colón-López, Alejandra
Schwiebert, Lisa M
Rogers, David A
An Investigation of Organizational Correlates of Distress in Non-Clinician Biomedical Researchers in the United States
title An Investigation of Organizational Correlates of Distress in Non-Clinician Biomedical Researchers in the United States
title_full An Investigation of Organizational Correlates of Distress in Non-Clinician Biomedical Researchers in the United States
title_fullStr An Investigation of Organizational Correlates of Distress in Non-Clinician Biomedical Researchers in the United States
title_full_unstemmed An Investigation of Organizational Correlates of Distress in Non-Clinician Biomedical Researchers in the United States
title_short An Investigation of Organizational Correlates of Distress in Non-Clinician Biomedical Researchers in the United States
title_sort investigation of organizational correlates of distress in non-clinician biomedical researchers in the united states
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776726
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S399517
work_keys_str_mv AT boitetlaurencem aninvestigationoforganizationalcorrelatesofdistressinnonclinicianbiomedicalresearchersintheunitedstates
AT meesekatherinea aninvestigationoforganizationalcorrelatesofdistressinnonclinicianbiomedicalresearchersintheunitedstates
AT colonlopezalejandra aninvestigationoforganizationalcorrelatesofdistressinnonclinicianbiomedicalresearchersintheunitedstates
AT schwiebertlisam aninvestigationoforganizationalcorrelatesofdistressinnonclinicianbiomedicalresearchersintheunitedstates
AT rogersdavida aninvestigationoforganizationalcorrelatesofdistressinnonclinicianbiomedicalresearchersintheunitedstates
AT boitetlaurencem investigationoforganizationalcorrelatesofdistressinnonclinicianbiomedicalresearchersintheunitedstates
AT meesekatherinea investigationoforganizationalcorrelatesofdistressinnonclinicianbiomedicalresearchersintheunitedstates
AT colonlopezalejandra investigationoforganizationalcorrelatesofdistressinnonclinicianbiomedicalresearchersintheunitedstates
AT schwiebertlisam investigationoforganizationalcorrelatesofdistressinnonclinicianbiomedicalresearchersintheunitedstates
AT rogersdavida investigationoforganizationalcorrelatesofdistressinnonclinicianbiomedicalresearchersintheunitedstates