Cargando…

Evaluating a community engagement model for malaria elimination in Haiti: lessons from the community health council project (2019–2021)

BACKGROUND: Community engagement (CE) plays a critical role in malaria control and elimination. CE approaches vary substantially, with more participatory programmes requiring higher levels of adaptive management. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a volunteer-based CE programme developed in H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bardosh, Kevin, Desir, Luccene, Jean, Lorence, Yoss, Sarah, Poovey, Brianna, Nute, Andrew, de Rochars, Madsen Valerie Beau, Telfort, Marc-Aurèle, Benoit, Fabiola, Chery, Ginette, Charlotin, Marie Carmelle, Noland, Gregory S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36759860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04471-z
_version_ 1784884747232608256
author Bardosh, Kevin
Desir, Luccene
Jean, Lorence
Yoss, Sarah
Poovey, Brianna
Nute, Andrew
de Rochars, Madsen Valerie Beau
Telfort, Marc-Aurèle
Benoit, Fabiola
Chery, Ginette
Charlotin, Marie Carmelle
Noland, Gregory S.
author_facet Bardosh, Kevin
Desir, Luccene
Jean, Lorence
Yoss, Sarah
Poovey, Brianna
Nute, Andrew
de Rochars, Madsen Valerie Beau
Telfort, Marc-Aurèle
Benoit, Fabiola
Chery, Ginette
Charlotin, Marie Carmelle
Noland, Gregory S.
author_sort Bardosh, Kevin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Community engagement (CE) plays a critical role in malaria control and elimination. CE approaches vary substantially, with more participatory programmes requiring higher levels of adaptive management. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a volunteer-based CE programme developed in Haiti in 2018. The approach was based on local leaders organizing and implementing monthly anti-malaria activities in their communities, and was implemented as part of Malaria Zero Consortium activities. METHODS: This programme evaluation draws on quantitative and qualitative data collected from 23 Community Health Councils (CHCs) over a two-year period (2019–2021) in Grand’Anse department, a malaria hotspot region in Haiti. RESULTS: Monthly monitoring data showed that 100% of the 23 CHCs remained functional over the two-year period, with an average of 0.90 monthly meetings held with an 85% attendance rate. A high degree of transparency and diversity in membership helped create strong planning and involvement from members. CHCs conducted an average of 1.6 community-based activities per month, directly engaging an average of 123 people per month. High levels of fluctuation in monthly activities were indicative of local ownership and self-organization. This included school and church sensitization, environmental sanitation campaigns, mass education, support for case referrals and community mobilization during mass drug administration (MDA) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) campaigns. Members drew on the tradition of konbit (mutual self-help), local histories of health and development campaigns and a lexicon of “solidarity” in difficult times as they negotiated their agency as community volunteers. Small incentives played both symbolic and supportive roles. Some level of politicization was viewed as inevitable, even beneficial. Rumours about financial and political profiteering of CHC volunteers took time to dispel while the tendency towards vertical planning in malaria control created conditions that excluded CHCs from some activities. This generated resentment from members who felt sidelined by the government malaria programme. CONCLUSION: The CHC model was effective in promoting group solidarity and community-based anti-malaria activities over a two-year period in Haiti. With the end of the Malaria Zero Consortium in early 2021, there is now an opportunity to better integrate this programme into the primary healthcare system, evaluate the impact of the CHCs on malaria epidemiology, and promote the greater integration of CHCs with active surveillance and response activities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-023-04471-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9910254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99102542023-02-10 Evaluating a community engagement model for malaria elimination in Haiti: lessons from the community health council project (2019–2021) Bardosh, Kevin Desir, Luccene Jean, Lorence Yoss, Sarah Poovey, Brianna Nute, Andrew de Rochars, Madsen Valerie Beau Telfort, Marc-Aurèle Benoit, Fabiola Chery, Ginette Charlotin, Marie Carmelle Noland, Gregory S. Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Community engagement (CE) plays a critical role in malaria control and elimination. CE approaches vary substantially, with more participatory programmes requiring higher levels of adaptive management. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a volunteer-based CE programme developed in Haiti in 2018. The approach was based on local leaders organizing and implementing monthly anti-malaria activities in their communities, and was implemented as part of Malaria Zero Consortium activities. METHODS: This programme evaluation draws on quantitative and qualitative data collected from 23 Community Health Councils (CHCs) over a two-year period (2019–2021) in Grand’Anse department, a malaria hotspot region in Haiti. RESULTS: Monthly monitoring data showed that 100% of the 23 CHCs remained functional over the two-year period, with an average of 0.90 monthly meetings held with an 85% attendance rate. A high degree of transparency and diversity in membership helped create strong planning and involvement from members. CHCs conducted an average of 1.6 community-based activities per month, directly engaging an average of 123 people per month. High levels of fluctuation in monthly activities were indicative of local ownership and self-organization. This included school and church sensitization, environmental sanitation campaigns, mass education, support for case referrals and community mobilization during mass drug administration (MDA) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) campaigns. Members drew on the tradition of konbit (mutual self-help), local histories of health and development campaigns and a lexicon of “solidarity” in difficult times as they negotiated their agency as community volunteers. Small incentives played both symbolic and supportive roles. Some level of politicization was viewed as inevitable, even beneficial. Rumours about financial and political profiteering of CHC volunteers took time to dispel while the tendency towards vertical planning in malaria control created conditions that excluded CHCs from some activities. This generated resentment from members who felt sidelined by the government malaria programme. CONCLUSION: The CHC model was effective in promoting group solidarity and community-based anti-malaria activities over a two-year period in Haiti. With the end of the Malaria Zero Consortium in early 2021, there is now an opportunity to better integrate this programme into the primary healthcare system, evaluate the impact of the CHCs on malaria epidemiology, and promote the greater integration of CHCs with active surveillance and response activities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-023-04471-z. BioMed Central 2023-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9910254/ /pubmed/36759860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04471-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bardosh, Kevin
Desir, Luccene
Jean, Lorence
Yoss, Sarah
Poovey, Brianna
Nute, Andrew
de Rochars, Madsen Valerie Beau
Telfort, Marc-Aurèle
Benoit, Fabiola
Chery, Ginette
Charlotin, Marie Carmelle
Noland, Gregory S.
Evaluating a community engagement model for malaria elimination in Haiti: lessons from the community health council project (2019–2021)
title Evaluating a community engagement model for malaria elimination in Haiti: lessons from the community health council project (2019–2021)
title_full Evaluating a community engagement model for malaria elimination in Haiti: lessons from the community health council project (2019–2021)
title_fullStr Evaluating a community engagement model for malaria elimination in Haiti: lessons from the community health council project (2019–2021)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating a community engagement model for malaria elimination in Haiti: lessons from the community health council project (2019–2021)
title_short Evaluating a community engagement model for malaria elimination in Haiti: lessons from the community health council project (2019–2021)
title_sort evaluating a community engagement model for malaria elimination in haiti: lessons from the community health council project (2019–2021)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36759860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04471-z
work_keys_str_mv AT bardoshkevin evaluatingacommunityengagementmodelformalariaeliminationinhaitilessonsfromthecommunityhealthcouncilproject20192021
AT desirluccene evaluatingacommunityengagementmodelformalariaeliminationinhaitilessonsfromthecommunityhealthcouncilproject20192021
AT jeanlorence evaluatingacommunityengagementmodelformalariaeliminationinhaitilessonsfromthecommunityhealthcouncilproject20192021
AT yosssarah evaluatingacommunityengagementmodelformalariaeliminationinhaitilessonsfromthecommunityhealthcouncilproject20192021
AT pooveybrianna evaluatingacommunityengagementmodelformalariaeliminationinhaitilessonsfromthecommunityhealthcouncilproject20192021
AT nuteandrew evaluatingacommunityengagementmodelformalariaeliminationinhaitilessonsfromthecommunityhealthcouncilproject20192021
AT derocharsmadsenvaleriebeau evaluatingacommunityengagementmodelformalariaeliminationinhaitilessonsfromthecommunityhealthcouncilproject20192021
AT telfortmarcaurele evaluatingacommunityengagementmodelformalariaeliminationinhaitilessonsfromthecommunityhealthcouncilproject20192021
AT benoitfabiola evaluatingacommunityengagementmodelformalariaeliminationinhaitilessonsfromthecommunityhealthcouncilproject20192021
AT cheryginette evaluatingacommunityengagementmodelformalariaeliminationinhaitilessonsfromthecommunityhealthcouncilproject20192021
AT charlotinmariecarmelle evaluatingacommunityengagementmodelformalariaeliminationinhaitilessonsfromthecommunityhealthcouncilproject20192021
AT nolandgregorys evaluatingacommunityengagementmodelformalariaeliminationinhaitilessonsfromthecommunityhealthcouncilproject20192021