Cargando…

Do proton pump inhibitors alter the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients? A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Gut microbiota can significantly affect the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer patients. Recently, antibiotics were shown to decrease survival rate of patients treated by ICIs. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can indeed modulate microbiota’s diversity, therefo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lopes, Sébastien, Pabst, Lucile, Dory, Anne, Klotz, Marion, Gourieux, Bénédicte, Michel, Bruno, Mascaux, Céline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776847
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1070076
_version_ 1784884818227494912
author Lopes, Sébastien
Pabst, Lucile
Dory, Anne
Klotz, Marion
Gourieux, Bénédicte
Michel, Bruno
Mascaux, Céline
author_facet Lopes, Sébastien
Pabst, Lucile
Dory, Anne
Klotz, Marion
Gourieux, Bénédicte
Michel, Bruno
Mascaux, Céline
author_sort Lopes, Sébastien
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Gut microbiota can significantly affect the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer patients. Recently, antibiotics were shown to decrease survival rate of patients treated by ICIs. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can indeed modulate microbiota’s diversity, therefore altering ICIs response. A meta-analysis was performed based on published data to verify this hypothesis. METHODS: In this study, over 41 publications, exploring the impact of concomitant PPI treatment on outcomes of ICI-treated patients, were analyzed. Evaluated endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported in ICIs in PPI users versus non-PPI users. Subgroup analyses were performed to minimize the impact of study heterogeneity and to investigate the influence of PPI on the different groups of interest. There was no evidence of publication bias for OS and PFS analysis in subgroup analysis. RESULTS: Forty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis, including a total of 20,042 patients. OS of patients receiving ICIs was negatively correlated in patients concomitantly treated with PPI (HR=1.37; 95%CI, 1.23–1.52). PFS of cancer patients receiving ICIs was also negatively correlated with PPI treatment (HR=1.28; 95%CI, 1.15–1.42). PPI and ICI use was associated with worst OS and PFS not only for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or urothelial cancer patients but also for patients treated with anti PD-1 (OS) and anti PD-L1 (OS and PFS) immunotherapies when administered in non-first line and when PPI was received as baseline treatment or in 60 days before ICI initiation. PPI and ICI use also showed the worst OS and PFS for patients from Europe and Asia. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that PPI treatment leads to significantly worse outcomes in advanced cancer patients treated by ICIs in terms of PFS and OS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9910608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99106082023-02-10 Do proton pump inhibitors alter the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients? A meta-analysis Lopes, Sébastien Pabst, Lucile Dory, Anne Klotz, Marion Gourieux, Bénédicte Michel, Bruno Mascaux, Céline Front Immunol Immunology INTRODUCTION: Gut microbiota can significantly affect the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer patients. Recently, antibiotics were shown to decrease survival rate of patients treated by ICIs. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can indeed modulate microbiota’s diversity, therefore altering ICIs response. A meta-analysis was performed based on published data to verify this hypothesis. METHODS: In this study, over 41 publications, exploring the impact of concomitant PPI treatment on outcomes of ICI-treated patients, were analyzed. Evaluated endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported in ICIs in PPI users versus non-PPI users. Subgroup analyses were performed to minimize the impact of study heterogeneity and to investigate the influence of PPI on the different groups of interest. There was no evidence of publication bias for OS and PFS analysis in subgroup analysis. RESULTS: Forty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis, including a total of 20,042 patients. OS of patients receiving ICIs was negatively correlated in patients concomitantly treated with PPI (HR=1.37; 95%CI, 1.23–1.52). PFS of cancer patients receiving ICIs was also negatively correlated with PPI treatment (HR=1.28; 95%CI, 1.15–1.42). PPI and ICI use was associated with worst OS and PFS not only for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or urothelial cancer patients but also for patients treated with anti PD-1 (OS) and anti PD-L1 (OS and PFS) immunotherapies when administered in non-first line and when PPI was received as baseline treatment or in 60 days before ICI initiation. PPI and ICI use also showed the worst OS and PFS for patients from Europe and Asia. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that PPI treatment leads to significantly worse outcomes in advanced cancer patients treated by ICIs in terms of PFS and OS. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9910608/ /pubmed/36776847 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1070076 Text en Copyright © 2023 Lopes, Pabst, Dory, Klotz, Gourieux, Michel and Mascaux https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Lopes, Sébastien
Pabst, Lucile
Dory, Anne
Klotz, Marion
Gourieux, Bénédicte
Michel, Bruno
Mascaux, Céline
Do proton pump inhibitors alter the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients? A meta-analysis
title Do proton pump inhibitors alter the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients? A meta-analysis
title_full Do proton pump inhibitors alter the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients? A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Do proton pump inhibitors alter the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients? A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Do proton pump inhibitors alter the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients? A meta-analysis
title_short Do proton pump inhibitors alter the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients? A meta-analysis
title_sort do proton pump inhibitors alter the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients? a meta-analysis
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776847
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1070076
work_keys_str_mv AT lopessebastien doprotonpumpinhibitorsaltertheresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincancerpatientsametaanalysis
AT pabstlucile doprotonpumpinhibitorsaltertheresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincancerpatientsametaanalysis
AT doryanne doprotonpumpinhibitorsaltertheresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincancerpatientsametaanalysis
AT klotzmarion doprotonpumpinhibitorsaltertheresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincancerpatientsametaanalysis
AT gourieuxbenedicte doprotonpumpinhibitorsaltertheresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincancerpatientsametaanalysis
AT michelbruno doprotonpumpinhibitorsaltertheresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincancerpatientsametaanalysis
AT mascauxceline doprotonpumpinhibitorsaltertheresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincancerpatientsametaanalysis