Cargando…

Sensor location affects skeletal muscle contractility parameters measured by tensiomyography

Tensiomyography (TMG) is a non-invasive method for measuring contractile properties of skeletal muscle that is increasingly being used in research and practice. However, the lack of standardization in measurement protocols mitigates the systematic use in sports medical settings. Therefore, this stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwiete, Carsten, Roth, Christian, Braun, Christoph, Rettenmaier, Lukas, Happ, Kevin, Langen, Georg, Behringer, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36758055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281651
_version_ 1784884822451159040
author Schwiete, Carsten
Roth, Christian
Braun, Christoph
Rettenmaier, Lukas
Happ, Kevin
Langen, Georg
Behringer, Michael
author_facet Schwiete, Carsten
Roth, Christian
Braun, Christoph
Rettenmaier, Lukas
Happ, Kevin
Langen, Georg
Behringer, Michael
author_sort Schwiete, Carsten
collection PubMed
description Tensiomyography (TMG) is a non-invasive method for measuring contractile properties of skeletal muscle that is increasingly being used in research and practice. However, the lack of standardization in measurement protocols mitigates the systematic use in sports medical settings. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of lower leg fixation and sensor location on TMG-derived parameters. Twenty-two male participants underwent TMG measurements on the m. biceps femoris (BF) in randomized order with and without lower leg fixation (fixed vs. non-fixed). Measurements were conducted at 50% of the muscle’s length (BF-mid) and 10 cm distal to this (BF-distal). The sensor location affected the contractile properties significantly, both with and without fixation. Delay time (T(d)) was greater at BF-mid compared to BF-distal (fixed: 23.2 ± 3.2 ms vs. 21.2 ± 2.7 ms, p = 0.002; non-fixed: 24.03 ± 4.2 ms vs. 21.8 ± 2.7 ms, p = 0.008), as were maximum displacement (D(m)) (fixed: 5.3 ± 2.7 mm vs. 3.5 ± 1.7 mm, p = 0.005; non-fixed: 5.4 ± 2.5 mm vs. 4.0 ± 2.0 mm, p = 0.03), and contraction velocity (V(c)) (fixed: 76.7 ± 25.1 mm/s vs. 57.2 ± 24.3 mm/s, p = 0.02). No significant differences were revealed for lower leg fixation (all p > 0.05). In summary, sensor location affects the TMG-derived parameters on the BF. Our findings help researchers to create tailored measurement procedures in compliance with the individual goals of the TMG measurements and allow adequate interpretation of TMG parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9910630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99106302023-02-10 Sensor location affects skeletal muscle contractility parameters measured by tensiomyography Schwiete, Carsten Roth, Christian Braun, Christoph Rettenmaier, Lukas Happ, Kevin Langen, Georg Behringer, Michael PLoS One Research Article Tensiomyography (TMG) is a non-invasive method for measuring contractile properties of skeletal muscle that is increasingly being used in research and practice. However, the lack of standardization in measurement protocols mitigates the systematic use in sports medical settings. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of lower leg fixation and sensor location on TMG-derived parameters. Twenty-two male participants underwent TMG measurements on the m. biceps femoris (BF) in randomized order with and without lower leg fixation (fixed vs. non-fixed). Measurements were conducted at 50% of the muscle’s length (BF-mid) and 10 cm distal to this (BF-distal). The sensor location affected the contractile properties significantly, both with and without fixation. Delay time (T(d)) was greater at BF-mid compared to BF-distal (fixed: 23.2 ± 3.2 ms vs. 21.2 ± 2.7 ms, p = 0.002; non-fixed: 24.03 ± 4.2 ms vs. 21.8 ± 2.7 ms, p = 0.008), as were maximum displacement (D(m)) (fixed: 5.3 ± 2.7 mm vs. 3.5 ± 1.7 mm, p = 0.005; non-fixed: 5.4 ± 2.5 mm vs. 4.0 ± 2.0 mm, p = 0.03), and contraction velocity (V(c)) (fixed: 76.7 ± 25.1 mm/s vs. 57.2 ± 24.3 mm/s, p = 0.02). No significant differences were revealed for lower leg fixation (all p > 0.05). In summary, sensor location affects the TMG-derived parameters on the BF. Our findings help researchers to create tailored measurement procedures in compliance with the individual goals of the TMG measurements and allow adequate interpretation of TMG parameters. Public Library of Science 2023-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9910630/ /pubmed/36758055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281651 Text en © 2023 Schwiete et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schwiete, Carsten
Roth, Christian
Braun, Christoph
Rettenmaier, Lukas
Happ, Kevin
Langen, Georg
Behringer, Michael
Sensor location affects skeletal muscle contractility parameters measured by tensiomyography
title Sensor location affects skeletal muscle contractility parameters measured by tensiomyography
title_full Sensor location affects skeletal muscle contractility parameters measured by tensiomyography
title_fullStr Sensor location affects skeletal muscle contractility parameters measured by tensiomyography
title_full_unstemmed Sensor location affects skeletal muscle contractility parameters measured by tensiomyography
title_short Sensor location affects skeletal muscle contractility parameters measured by tensiomyography
title_sort sensor location affects skeletal muscle contractility parameters measured by tensiomyography
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36758055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281651
work_keys_str_mv AT schwietecarsten sensorlocationaffectsskeletalmusclecontractilityparametersmeasuredbytensiomyography
AT rothchristian sensorlocationaffectsskeletalmusclecontractilityparametersmeasuredbytensiomyography
AT braunchristoph sensorlocationaffectsskeletalmusclecontractilityparametersmeasuredbytensiomyography
AT rettenmaierlukas sensorlocationaffectsskeletalmusclecontractilityparametersmeasuredbytensiomyography
AT happkevin sensorlocationaffectsskeletalmusclecontractilityparametersmeasuredbytensiomyography
AT langengeorg sensorlocationaffectsskeletalmusclecontractilityparametersmeasuredbytensiomyography
AT behringermichael sensorlocationaffectsskeletalmusclecontractilityparametersmeasuredbytensiomyography