Cargando…
Quality improvements in radiation oncology clinical trials
Clinical trials have become the primary mechanism to validate process improvements in oncology clinical practice. Over the past two decades there have been considerable process improvements in the practice of radiation oncology within the structure of a modern department using advanced technology fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776318 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1015596 |
_version_ | 1784884947650084864 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Koren Ulin, Kenneth Knopp, Michael Kry, Stephan Xiao, Ying Rosen, Mark Michalski, Jeff Iandoli, Matthew Laurie, Fran Quigley, Jean Reifler, Heather Santiago, Juan Briggs, Kathleen Kirby, Shawn Schmitter, Kate Prior, Fred Saltz, Joel Sharma, Ashish Bishop-Jodoin, Maryann Moni, Janaki Cicchetti, M. Giulia FitzGerald, Thomas J. |
author_facet | Smith, Koren Ulin, Kenneth Knopp, Michael Kry, Stephan Xiao, Ying Rosen, Mark Michalski, Jeff Iandoli, Matthew Laurie, Fran Quigley, Jean Reifler, Heather Santiago, Juan Briggs, Kathleen Kirby, Shawn Schmitter, Kate Prior, Fred Saltz, Joel Sharma, Ashish Bishop-Jodoin, Maryann Moni, Janaki Cicchetti, M. Giulia FitzGerald, Thomas J. |
author_sort | Smith, Koren |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical trials have become the primary mechanism to validate process improvements in oncology clinical practice. Over the past two decades there have been considerable process improvements in the practice of radiation oncology within the structure of a modern department using advanced technology for patient care. Treatment planning is accomplished with volume definition including fusion of multiple series of diagnostic images into volumetric planning studies to optimize the definition of tumor and define the relationship of tumor to normal tissue. Daily treatment is validated by multiple tools of image guidance. Computer planning has been optimized and supported by the increasing use of artificial intelligence in treatment planning. Informatics technology has improved, and departments have become geographically transparent integrated through informatics bridges creating an economy of scale for the planning and execution of advanced technology radiation therapy. This serves to provide consistency in department habits and improve quality of patient care. Improvements in normal tissue sparing have further improved tolerance of treatment and allowed radiation oncologists to increase both daily and total dose to target. Radiation oncologists need to define a priori dose volume constraints to normal tissue as well as define how image guidance will be applied to each radiation treatment. These process improvements have enhanced the utility of radiation therapy in patient care and have made radiation therapy an attractive option for care in multiple primary disease settings. In this chapter we review how these changes have been applied to clinical practice and incorporated into clinical trials. We will discuss how the changes in clinical practice have improved the quality of clinical trials in radiation therapy. We will also identify what gaps remain and need to be addressed to offer further improvements in radiation oncology clinical trials and patient care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9911211 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99112112023-02-10 Quality improvements in radiation oncology clinical trials Smith, Koren Ulin, Kenneth Knopp, Michael Kry, Stephan Xiao, Ying Rosen, Mark Michalski, Jeff Iandoli, Matthew Laurie, Fran Quigley, Jean Reifler, Heather Santiago, Juan Briggs, Kathleen Kirby, Shawn Schmitter, Kate Prior, Fred Saltz, Joel Sharma, Ashish Bishop-Jodoin, Maryann Moni, Janaki Cicchetti, M. Giulia FitzGerald, Thomas J. Front Oncol Oncology Clinical trials have become the primary mechanism to validate process improvements in oncology clinical practice. Over the past two decades there have been considerable process improvements in the practice of radiation oncology within the structure of a modern department using advanced technology for patient care. Treatment planning is accomplished with volume definition including fusion of multiple series of diagnostic images into volumetric planning studies to optimize the definition of tumor and define the relationship of tumor to normal tissue. Daily treatment is validated by multiple tools of image guidance. Computer planning has been optimized and supported by the increasing use of artificial intelligence in treatment planning. Informatics technology has improved, and departments have become geographically transparent integrated through informatics bridges creating an economy of scale for the planning and execution of advanced technology radiation therapy. This serves to provide consistency in department habits and improve quality of patient care. Improvements in normal tissue sparing have further improved tolerance of treatment and allowed radiation oncologists to increase both daily and total dose to target. Radiation oncologists need to define a priori dose volume constraints to normal tissue as well as define how image guidance will be applied to each radiation treatment. These process improvements have enhanced the utility of radiation therapy in patient care and have made radiation therapy an attractive option for care in multiple primary disease settings. In this chapter we review how these changes have been applied to clinical practice and incorporated into clinical trials. We will discuss how the changes in clinical practice have improved the quality of clinical trials in radiation therapy. We will also identify what gaps remain and need to be addressed to offer further improvements in radiation oncology clinical trials and patient care. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9911211/ /pubmed/36776318 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1015596 Text en Copyright © 2023 Smith, Ulin, Knopp, Kry, Xiao, Rosen, Michalski, Iandoli, Laurie, Quigley, Reifler, Santiago, Briggs, Kirby, Schmitter, Prior, Saltz, Sharma, Bishop-Jodoin, Moni, Cicchetti and FitzGerald https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Smith, Koren Ulin, Kenneth Knopp, Michael Kry, Stephan Xiao, Ying Rosen, Mark Michalski, Jeff Iandoli, Matthew Laurie, Fran Quigley, Jean Reifler, Heather Santiago, Juan Briggs, Kathleen Kirby, Shawn Schmitter, Kate Prior, Fred Saltz, Joel Sharma, Ashish Bishop-Jodoin, Maryann Moni, Janaki Cicchetti, M. Giulia FitzGerald, Thomas J. Quality improvements in radiation oncology clinical trials |
title | Quality improvements in radiation oncology clinical trials |
title_full | Quality improvements in radiation oncology clinical trials |
title_fullStr | Quality improvements in radiation oncology clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality improvements in radiation oncology clinical trials |
title_short | Quality improvements in radiation oncology clinical trials |
title_sort | quality improvements in radiation oncology clinical trials |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776318 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1015596 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithkoren qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT ulinkenneth qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT knoppmichael qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT krystephan qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT xiaoying qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT rosenmark qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT michalskijeff qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT iandolimatthew qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT lauriefran qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT quigleyjean qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT reiflerheather qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT santiagojuan qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT briggskathleen qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT kirbyshawn qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT schmitterkate qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT priorfred qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT saltzjoel qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT sharmaashish qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT bishopjodoinmaryann qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT monijanaki qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT cicchettimgiulia qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials AT fitzgeraldthomasj qualityimprovementsinradiationoncologyclinicaltrials |