Cargando…
Simultaneous Segmentation and Classification of Pressure Injury Image Data Using Mask-R-CNN
BACKGROUND: Pressure injuries (PIs) impose a substantial burden on patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems, affecting an estimated 3 million Americans and costing nearly $18 billion annually. Accurate pressure injury staging remains clinically challenging. Over the last decade, object detection...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3858997 |
_version_ | 1784884953288278016 |
---|---|
author | Swerdlow, Mark Guler, Ozgur Yaakov, Raphael Armstrong, David G. |
author_facet | Swerdlow, Mark Guler, Ozgur Yaakov, Raphael Armstrong, David G. |
author_sort | Swerdlow, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pressure injuries (PIs) impose a substantial burden on patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems, affecting an estimated 3 million Americans and costing nearly $18 billion annually. Accurate pressure injury staging remains clinically challenging. Over the last decade, object detection and semantic segmentation have evolved quickly with new methods invented and new application areas emerging. Simultaneous object detection and segmentation paved the way to segment and classify anatomical structures. In this study, we utilize the Mask-R-CNN algorithm for segmentation and classification of stage 1-4 pressure injuries. METHODS: Images from the eKare Inc. pressure injury wound data repository were segmented and classified manually by two study authors with medical training. The Mask-R-CNN model was implemented using the Keras deep learning and TensorFlow libraries with Python. We split 969 pressure injury images into training (87.5%) and validation (12.5%) subsets for Mask-R-CNN training. RESULTS: We included 121 random pressure injury images in our test set. The Mask-R-CNN model showed overall classification accuracy of 92.6%, and the segmentation demonstrated 93.0% accuracy. Our F1 scores for stages 1-4 were 0.842, 0.947, 0.907, and 0.944, respectively. Our Dice coefficients for stages 1-4 were 0.92, 0.85, 0.93, and 0.91, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our Mask-R-CNN model provides levels of accuracy considerably greater than the average healthcare professional who works with pressure injury patients. This tool can be easily incorporated into the clinician's workflow to aid in the hospital setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9911250 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99112502023-02-10 Simultaneous Segmentation and Classification of Pressure Injury Image Data Using Mask-R-CNN Swerdlow, Mark Guler, Ozgur Yaakov, Raphael Armstrong, David G. Comput Math Methods Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Pressure injuries (PIs) impose a substantial burden on patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems, affecting an estimated 3 million Americans and costing nearly $18 billion annually. Accurate pressure injury staging remains clinically challenging. Over the last decade, object detection and semantic segmentation have evolved quickly with new methods invented and new application areas emerging. Simultaneous object detection and segmentation paved the way to segment and classify anatomical structures. In this study, we utilize the Mask-R-CNN algorithm for segmentation and classification of stage 1-4 pressure injuries. METHODS: Images from the eKare Inc. pressure injury wound data repository were segmented and classified manually by two study authors with medical training. The Mask-R-CNN model was implemented using the Keras deep learning and TensorFlow libraries with Python. We split 969 pressure injury images into training (87.5%) and validation (12.5%) subsets for Mask-R-CNN training. RESULTS: We included 121 random pressure injury images in our test set. The Mask-R-CNN model showed overall classification accuracy of 92.6%, and the segmentation demonstrated 93.0% accuracy. Our F1 scores for stages 1-4 were 0.842, 0.947, 0.907, and 0.944, respectively. Our Dice coefficients for stages 1-4 were 0.92, 0.85, 0.93, and 0.91, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our Mask-R-CNN model provides levels of accuracy considerably greater than the average healthcare professional who works with pressure injury patients. This tool can be easily incorporated into the clinician's workflow to aid in the hospital setting. Hindawi 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9911250/ /pubmed/36778787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3858997 Text en Copyright © 2023 Mark Swerdlow et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Swerdlow, Mark Guler, Ozgur Yaakov, Raphael Armstrong, David G. Simultaneous Segmentation and Classification of Pressure Injury Image Data Using Mask-R-CNN |
title | Simultaneous Segmentation and Classification of Pressure Injury Image Data Using Mask-R-CNN |
title_full | Simultaneous Segmentation and Classification of Pressure Injury Image Data Using Mask-R-CNN |
title_fullStr | Simultaneous Segmentation and Classification of Pressure Injury Image Data Using Mask-R-CNN |
title_full_unstemmed | Simultaneous Segmentation and Classification of Pressure Injury Image Data Using Mask-R-CNN |
title_short | Simultaneous Segmentation and Classification of Pressure Injury Image Data Using Mask-R-CNN |
title_sort | simultaneous segmentation and classification of pressure injury image data using mask-r-cnn |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3858997 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swerdlowmark simultaneoussegmentationandclassificationofpressureinjuryimagedatausingmaskrcnn AT gulerozgur simultaneoussegmentationandclassificationofpressureinjuryimagedatausingmaskrcnn AT yaakovraphael simultaneoussegmentationandclassificationofpressureinjuryimagedatausingmaskrcnn AT armstrongdavidg simultaneoussegmentationandclassificationofpressureinjuryimagedatausingmaskrcnn |