Cargando…

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children: A retrospective single-center study

OBJECTIVES: (1) Compare 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) diagnoses in a pediatric population with the new 2022 guidelines to the original diagnoses with the 2014 guidelines. (2) Determine whether findings of hypertension from ABPM could be predicted from prior patient data. (3) De...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahlenius, Mark, Koek, Wouter, Yamaguchi, Ikuyo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776905
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1088857
_version_ 1784885010070765568
author Ahlenius, Mark
Koek, Wouter
Yamaguchi, Ikuyo
author_facet Ahlenius, Mark
Koek, Wouter
Yamaguchi, Ikuyo
author_sort Ahlenius, Mark
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: (1) Compare 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) diagnoses in a pediatric population with the new 2022 guidelines to the original diagnoses with the 2014 guidelines. (2) Determine whether findings of hypertension from ABPM could be predicted from prior patient data. (3) Determine whether ABPM readings could predict left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in patients who obtained an echocardiogram (ECHO). STUDY DESIGN: Single-center retrospective study on patients referred to Pediatric Nephrology Clinic for evaluation of elevated blood pressure who underwent ABPM from 2015 to 2018. Predictions of hypertension were obtained using a logistic regression model, and predictions of LVMI were performed using regression models including (a) the wake systolic and diastolic BP indices, or (b) additionally including the standard deviation (SD) of wake SBP and DBP. RESULTS: With the change in 2022 to new ABPM guidelines from the AHA, comparing the old and new guidelines led to 70% of previous pre-hypertensive diagnoses now meeting criteria for diagnosis of hypertension, and a rise from 21% of the ABPMs meeting criteria for hypertension to 51% now meeting criteria. In a logistic regression model, prior patient data were not predictive of a diagnosis of hypertension from ABPM (Nagelkerke's R(2) = 0.04). Among the individual variables studied, none were statistically significant. For prediction of LVMI, the SD of wake SBP and DBP were significantly associated with increased LVMI, but the wake SBP and DBP indices were not. CONCLUSIONS: In our patient population, the new ABPM guidelines led to a significant increase in diagnoses of hypertension. Prior patient data was not sufficient to predict a diagnosis of hypertension by ABPM, supporting the need for evaluation by ABPM as the gold standard. Our analysis of the relationship between ABPM readings and LVMI supports the hypothesis that BP variability contributes to increased LVMI. These data are consistent with growing evidence in the adult literature that BP variability detected by ABPM is associated with left-ventricular hypertrophy
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9911535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99115352023-02-11 Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children: A retrospective single-center study Ahlenius, Mark Koek, Wouter Yamaguchi, Ikuyo Front Pediatr Pediatrics OBJECTIVES: (1) Compare 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) diagnoses in a pediatric population with the new 2022 guidelines to the original diagnoses with the 2014 guidelines. (2) Determine whether findings of hypertension from ABPM could be predicted from prior patient data. (3) Determine whether ABPM readings could predict left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in patients who obtained an echocardiogram (ECHO). STUDY DESIGN: Single-center retrospective study on patients referred to Pediatric Nephrology Clinic for evaluation of elevated blood pressure who underwent ABPM from 2015 to 2018. Predictions of hypertension were obtained using a logistic regression model, and predictions of LVMI were performed using regression models including (a) the wake systolic and diastolic BP indices, or (b) additionally including the standard deviation (SD) of wake SBP and DBP. RESULTS: With the change in 2022 to new ABPM guidelines from the AHA, comparing the old and new guidelines led to 70% of previous pre-hypertensive diagnoses now meeting criteria for diagnosis of hypertension, and a rise from 21% of the ABPMs meeting criteria for hypertension to 51% now meeting criteria. In a logistic regression model, prior patient data were not predictive of a diagnosis of hypertension from ABPM (Nagelkerke's R(2) = 0.04). Among the individual variables studied, none were statistically significant. For prediction of LVMI, the SD of wake SBP and DBP were significantly associated with increased LVMI, but the wake SBP and DBP indices were not. CONCLUSIONS: In our patient population, the new ABPM guidelines led to a significant increase in diagnoses of hypertension. Prior patient data was not sufficient to predict a diagnosis of hypertension by ABPM, supporting the need for evaluation by ABPM as the gold standard. Our analysis of the relationship between ABPM readings and LVMI supports the hypothesis that BP variability contributes to increased LVMI. These data are consistent with growing evidence in the adult literature that BP variability detected by ABPM is associated with left-ventricular hypertrophy Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9911535/ /pubmed/36776905 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1088857 Text en © 2023 Ahlenius, Koek and Yamaguchi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Ahlenius, Mark
Koek, Wouter
Yamaguchi, Ikuyo
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children: A retrospective single-center study
title Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children: A retrospective single-center study
title_full Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children: A retrospective single-center study
title_fullStr Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children: A retrospective single-center study
title_full_unstemmed Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children: A retrospective single-center study
title_short Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children: A retrospective single-center study
title_sort ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children: a retrospective single-center study
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776905
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1088857
work_keys_str_mv AT ahleniusmark ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringinchildrenaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT koekwouter ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringinchildrenaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT yamaguchiikuyo ambulatorybloodpressuremonitoringinchildrenaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy