Cargando…
Free-floating medial meniscus implant kinematics do not change after simulation of medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and notchplasty
PURPOSE: The purpose of this in-vitro study was to examine the kinematics of an artificial, free-floating medial meniscus replacement device under dynamic loading situations and different knee joint states. METHODS: A dynamic knee simulator was used to perform dynamic loading exercises on three neut...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36757624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00576-1 |
_version_ | 1784885015039967232 |
---|---|
author | Sukopp, Matthias Shemesh, Maoz Pruech, Elena Linder-Ganz, Eran Hacker, Scott Condello, Vincenzo Schwer, Jonas Ignatius, Anita Dürselen, Lutz Seitz, Andreas Martin |
author_facet | Sukopp, Matthias Shemesh, Maoz Pruech, Elena Linder-Ganz, Eran Hacker, Scott Condello, Vincenzo Schwer, Jonas Ignatius, Anita Dürselen, Lutz Seitz, Andreas Martin |
author_sort | Sukopp, Matthias |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this in-vitro study was to examine the kinematics of an artificial, free-floating medial meniscus replacement device under dynamic loading situations and different knee joint states. METHODS: A dynamic knee simulator was used to perform dynamic loading exercises on three neutrally aligned and three 10° valgus aligned (simulating a medial openwedge high tibial osteotomy - MOWHTO) left human cadaveric knee joints. The knee joints were tested in three states (intact, conventional notchplasty, extended notchplasty) while 11 randomised exercises were simulated (jump landing, squatting, tibial rotation and axial ground impacts at 10°, 30° and 60° knee joint flexion) to investigate the knee joint and implant kinematics by means of rigidly attached reflective marker sets and an according motion analysis. RESULTS: The maximum implant translation relative to the tibial plateau was < 13 mm and the maximum implant rotation was < 19° for all exercises. Both, the notchplasties and the valgus knee alignment did not affect the device kinematics. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present in-vitro study showed that the non-anchored free-floating device remains within the medial knee joint gap under challenging dynamic loading situations without indicating any luxation tendencies. This also provides initial benchtop evidence that the device offers suitable stability and kinematic behaviour to be considered a potential alternative to meniscus allograft transplantation in combination with an MOWHTO, potentially expanding the patient collective in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9911568 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99115682023-02-11 Free-floating medial meniscus implant kinematics do not change after simulation of medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and notchplasty Sukopp, Matthias Shemesh, Maoz Pruech, Elena Linder-Ganz, Eran Hacker, Scott Condello, Vincenzo Schwer, Jonas Ignatius, Anita Dürselen, Lutz Seitz, Andreas Martin J Exp Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: The purpose of this in-vitro study was to examine the kinematics of an artificial, free-floating medial meniscus replacement device under dynamic loading situations and different knee joint states. METHODS: A dynamic knee simulator was used to perform dynamic loading exercises on three neutrally aligned and three 10° valgus aligned (simulating a medial openwedge high tibial osteotomy - MOWHTO) left human cadaveric knee joints. The knee joints were tested in three states (intact, conventional notchplasty, extended notchplasty) while 11 randomised exercises were simulated (jump landing, squatting, tibial rotation and axial ground impacts at 10°, 30° and 60° knee joint flexion) to investigate the knee joint and implant kinematics by means of rigidly attached reflective marker sets and an according motion analysis. RESULTS: The maximum implant translation relative to the tibial plateau was < 13 mm and the maximum implant rotation was < 19° for all exercises. Both, the notchplasties and the valgus knee alignment did not affect the device kinematics. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present in-vitro study showed that the non-anchored free-floating device remains within the medial knee joint gap under challenging dynamic loading situations without indicating any luxation tendencies. This also provides initial benchtop evidence that the device offers suitable stability and kinematic behaviour to be considered a potential alternative to meniscus allograft transplantation in combination with an MOWHTO, potentially expanding the patient collective in the future. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9911568/ /pubmed/36757624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00576-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Sukopp, Matthias Shemesh, Maoz Pruech, Elena Linder-Ganz, Eran Hacker, Scott Condello, Vincenzo Schwer, Jonas Ignatius, Anita Dürselen, Lutz Seitz, Andreas Martin Free-floating medial meniscus implant kinematics do not change after simulation of medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and notchplasty |
title | Free-floating medial meniscus implant kinematics do not change after simulation of medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and notchplasty |
title_full | Free-floating medial meniscus implant kinematics do not change after simulation of medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and notchplasty |
title_fullStr | Free-floating medial meniscus implant kinematics do not change after simulation of medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and notchplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Free-floating medial meniscus implant kinematics do not change after simulation of medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and notchplasty |
title_short | Free-floating medial meniscus implant kinematics do not change after simulation of medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and notchplasty |
title_sort | free-floating medial meniscus implant kinematics do not change after simulation of medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and notchplasty |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36757624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00576-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sukoppmatthias freefloatingmedialmeniscusimplantkinematicsdonotchangeaftersimulationofmedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomyandnotchplasty AT shemeshmaoz freefloatingmedialmeniscusimplantkinematicsdonotchangeaftersimulationofmedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomyandnotchplasty AT pruechelena freefloatingmedialmeniscusimplantkinematicsdonotchangeaftersimulationofmedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomyandnotchplasty AT linderganzeran freefloatingmedialmeniscusimplantkinematicsdonotchangeaftersimulationofmedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomyandnotchplasty AT hackerscott freefloatingmedialmeniscusimplantkinematicsdonotchangeaftersimulationofmedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomyandnotchplasty AT condellovincenzo freefloatingmedialmeniscusimplantkinematicsdonotchangeaftersimulationofmedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomyandnotchplasty AT schwerjonas freefloatingmedialmeniscusimplantkinematicsdonotchangeaftersimulationofmedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomyandnotchplasty AT ignatiusanita freefloatingmedialmeniscusimplantkinematicsdonotchangeaftersimulationofmedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomyandnotchplasty AT durselenlutz freefloatingmedialmeniscusimplantkinematicsdonotchangeaftersimulationofmedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomyandnotchplasty AT seitzandreasmartin freefloatingmedialmeniscusimplantkinematicsdonotchangeaftersimulationofmedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomyandnotchplasty |