Cargando…

Comparative assessment of coronary physiology using transthoracic pulsed-wave Doppler and myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats

BACKGROUND: Coronary physiology assessment in rodents by ultrasound is an excellent noninvasive and easy to perform technique, including pulsed-wave Doppler (PWD) and myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). Both techniques and the corresponding calculated parameters were investigated in this stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Billig, Sebastian, Hein, Marc, Mechelinck, Mare, Schumacher, David, Roehl, Anna B., Fuchs, Dieter, Kramann, Rafael, Uhlig, Moritz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36757486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00319-4
_version_ 1784885018011631616
author Billig, Sebastian
Hein, Marc
Mechelinck, Mare
Schumacher, David
Roehl, Anna B.
Fuchs, Dieter
Kramann, Rafael
Uhlig, Moritz
author_facet Billig, Sebastian
Hein, Marc
Mechelinck, Mare
Schumacher, David
Roehl, Anna B.
Fuchs, Dieter
Kramann, Rafael
Uhlig, Moritz
author_sort Billig, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coronary physiology assessment in rodents by ultrasound is an excellent noninvasive and easy to perform technique, including pulsed-wave Doppler (PWD) and myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). Both techniques and the corresponding calculated parameters were investigated in this study at rest as well as their response to pharmacologically induced stress. METHODS: Left ventricular myocardial function was assessed in eight anaesthetised rats using transthoracic echocardiography. Coronary physiology was assessed by both PWD of the left coronary artery and MCE using a bolus method. Measurements were performed at rest and under stimulation with adenosine and dobutamine. Effects of stimulation on the calculated parameters were evaluated and rated by effect size (η(2)). RESULTS: Changes could be demonstrated by selected parameters of PWD and MCE. The clearest effect in PWD was found for diastolic peak velocity (η(2) = 0.58). It increased from 528 ± 110 mm/s (mean ± standard deviation) at rest to 839 ± 342 mm/s (p = 0.001) with adenosine and 1093 ± 302 mm/s with dobutamine (p = 0.001). The most distinct effect from MCE was found for the normalised wash-in rate (η(2) = 0.58). It increased from 1.95 ± 0.35% at rest to 3.87 ± 0.85% with adenosine (p = 0.001) and 3.72 ± 1.03% with dobutamine (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Induced changes in coronary physiology by adenosine and dobutamine could successfully be monitored using MCE and PWD in anaesthetised rats. Due to the low invasiveness of the measurements, this protocol could be used for longitudinal animal studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9911582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99115822023-02-11 Comparative assessment of coronary physiology using transthoracic pulsed-wave Doppler and myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats Billig, Sebastian Hein, Marc Mechelinck, Mare Schumacher, David Roehl, Anna B. Fuchs, Dieter Kramann, Rafael Uhlig, Moritz Eur Radiol Exp Original Article BACKGROUND: Coronary physiology assessment in rodents by ultrasound is an excellent noninvasive and easy to perform technique, including pulsed-wave Doppler (PWD) and myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). Both techniques and the corresponding calculated parameters were investigated in this study at rest as well as their response to pharmacologically induced stress. METHODS: Left ventricular myocardial function was assessed in eight anaesthetised rats using transthoracic echocardiography. Coronary physiology was assessed by both PWD of the left coronary artery and MCE using a bolus method. Measurements were performed at rest and under stimulation with adenosine and dobutamine. Effects of stimulation on the calculated parameters were evaluated and rated by effect size (η(2)). RESULTS: Changes could be demonstrated by selected parameters of PWD and MCE. The clearest effect in PWD was found for diastolic peak velocity (η(2) = 0.58). It increased from 528 ± 110 mm/s (mean ± standard deviation) at rest to 839 ± 342 mm/s (p = 0.001) with adenosine and 1093 ± 302 mm/s with dobutamine (p = 0.001). The most distinct effect from MCE was found for the normalised wash-in rate (η(2) = 0.58). It increased from 1.95 ± 0.35% at rest to 3.87 ± 0.85% with adenosine (p = 0.001) and 3.72 ± 1.03% with dobutamine (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Induced changes in coronary physiology by adenosine and dobutamine could successfully be monitored using MCE and PWD in anaesthetised rats. Due to the low invasiveness of the measurements, this protocol could be used for longitudinal animal studies. Springer Vienna 2023-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9911582/ /pubmed/36757486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00319-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Billig, Sebastian
Hein, Marc
Mechelinck, Mare
Schumacher, David
Roehl, Anna B.
Fuchs, Dieter
Kramann, Rafael
Uhlig, Moritz
Comparative assessment of coronary physiology using transthoracic pulsed-wave Doppler and myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats
title Comparative assessment of coronary physiology using transthoracic pulsed-wave Doppler and myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats
title_full Comparative assessment of coronary physiology using transthoracic pulsed-wave Doppler and myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of coronary physiology using transthoracic pulsed-wave Doppler and myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of coronary physiology using transthoracic pulsed-wave Doppler and myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats
title_short Comparative assessment of coronary physiology using transthoracic pulsed-wave Doppler and myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats
title_sort comparative assessment of coronary physiology using transthoracic pulsed-wave doppler and myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36757486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00319-4
work_keys_str_mv AT billigsebastian comparativeassessmentofcoronaryphysiologyusingtransthoracicpulsedwavedopplerandmyocardialcontrastechocardiographyinrats
AT heinmarc comparativeassessmentofcoronaryphysiologyusingtransthoracicpulsedwavedopplerandmyocardialcontrastechocardiographyinrats
AT mechelinckmare comparativeassessmentofcoronaryphysiologyusingtransthoracicpulsedwavedopplerandmyocardialcontrastechocardiographyinrats
AT schumacherdavid comparativeassessmentofcoronaryphysiologyusingtransthoracicpulsedwavedopplerandmyocardialcontrastechocardiographyinrats
AT roehlannab comparativeassessmentofcoronaryphysiologyusingtransthoracicpulsedwavedopplerandmyocardialcontrastechocardiographyinrats
AT fuchsdieter comparativeassessmentofcoronaryphysiologyusingtransthoracicpulsedwavedopplerandmyocardialcontrastechocardiographyinrats
AT kramannrafael comparativeassessmentofcoronaryphysiologyusingtransthoracicpulsedwavedopplerandmyocardialcontrastechocardiographyinrats
AT uhligmoritz comparativeassessmentofcoronaryphysiologyusingtransthoracicpulsedwavedopplerandmyocardialcontrastechocardiographyinrats