Cargando…

Replacing Alteplase with Tenecteplase: Is the Time Ripe?

Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke has predominantly been with alteplase for over a quarter of a century. In recent years, with trials showing evidence of higher rates of successful reperfusion, similar safety profile and efficacy of tenecteplase (TNK) as compared to alteplase, TNK has now emerg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Nishita, Menon, Bijoy K., Dmytriw, Adam A., Regenhardt, Robert W., Hirsch, Joshua A., Ganesh, Aravind
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Stroke Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36746381
http://dx.doi.org/10.5853/jos.2022.02880
_version_ 1784885082719256576
author Singh, Nishita
Menon, Bijoy K.
Dmytriw, Adam A.
Regenhardt, Robert W.
Hirsch, Joshua A.
Ganesh, Aravind
author_facet Singh, Nishita
Menon, Bijoy K.
Dmytriw, Adam A.
Regenhardt, Robert W.
Hirsch, Joshua A.
Ganesh, Aravind
author_sort Singh, Nishita
collection PubMed
description Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke has predominantly been with alteplase for over a quarter of a century. In recent years, with trials showing evidence of higher rates of successful reperfusion, similar safety profile and efficacy of tenecteplase (TNK) as compared to alteplase, TNK has now emerged as another potential choice for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. In this review, we will focus on these recent advances, aiming: (1) to provide a brief overview of thrombolysis in stroke; (2) to provide comparisons between alteplase and TNK for clinical, imaging, and safety outcomes; (3) to focus on key subgroups of interest to understand if there is an advantage of using TNK over alteplase or vice-versa, to review available evidence on role of TNK in intra-arterial thrombolysis, as bridging therapy and in mobile stroke units; and (4) to summarize what to expect in the near future from recently completed trials and propose areas for future research on this evolving topic. We present compelling data from several trials regarding the safety and efficacy of TNK in acute ischemic stroke along with completed yet unpublished trials that will help provide insight into these unanswered questions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9911848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Korean Stroke Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99118482023-02-16 Replacing Alteplase with Tenecteplase: Is the Time Ripe? Singh, Nishita Menon, Bijoy K. Dmytriw, Adam A. Regenhardt, Robert W. Hirsch, Joshua A. Ganesh, Aravind J Stroke Review Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke has predominantly been with alteplase for over a quarter of a century. In recent years, with trials showing evidence of higher rates of successful reperfusion, similar safety profile and efficacy of tenecteplase (TNK) as compared to alteplase, TNK has now emerged as another potential choice for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. In this review, we will focus on these recent advances, aiming: (1) to provide a brief overview of thrombolysis in stroke; (2) to provide comparisons between alteplase and TNK for clinical, imaging, and safety outcomes; (3) to focus on key subgroups of interest to understand if there is an advantage of using TNK over alteplase or vice-versa, to review available evidence on role of TNK in intra-arterial thrombolysis, as bridging therapy and in mobile stroke units; and (4) to summarize what to expect in the near future from recently completed trials and propose areas for future research on this evolving topic. We present compelling data from several trials regarding the safety and efficacy of TNK in acute ischemic stroke along with completed yet unpublished trials that will help provide insight into these unanswered questions. Korean Stroke Society 2023-01 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9911848/ /pubmed/36746381 http://dx.doi.org/10.5853/jos.2022.02880 Text en Copyright © 2023 Korean Stroke Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Singh, Nishita
Menon, Bijoy K.
Dmytriw, Adam A.
Regenhardt, Robert W.
Hirsch, Joshua A.
Ganesh, Aravind
Replacing Alteplase with Tenecteplase: Is the Time Ripe?
title Replacing Alteplase with Tenecteplase: Is the Time Ripe?
title_full Replacing Alteplase with Tenecteplase: Is the Time Ripe?
title_fullStr Replacing Alteplase with Tenecteplase: Is the Time Ripe?
title_full_unstemmed Replacing Alteplase with Tenecteplase: Is the Time Ripe?
title_short Replacing Alteplase with Tenecteplase: Is the Time Ripe?
title_sort replacing alteplase with tenecteplase: is the time ripe?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36746381
http://dx.doi.org/10.5853/jos.2022.02880
work_keys_str_mv AT singhnishita replacingalteplasewithtenecteplaseisthetimeripe
AT menonbijoyk replacingalteplasewithtenecteplaseisthetimeripe
AT dmytriwadama replacingalteplasewithtenecteplaseisthetimeripe
AT regenhardtrobertw replacingalteplasewithtenecteplaseisthetimeripe
AT hirschjoshuaa replacingalteplasewithtenecteplaseisthetimeripe
AT ganesharavind replacingalteplasewithtenecteplaseisthetimeripe