Cargando…
Three-level model for opinion aggregation under hesitance
Valuable information for decision-making can be obtained by collecting and analyzing opinions from diverse stakeholder or respondent groups, which usually have different backgrounds and are variously affected by the topics under survey. For this to succeed, it is necessary to manage the uncertainty...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36789205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-07853-2 |
_version_ | 1784885160206925824 |
---|---|
author | Zapletal, František Hudec, Miroslav Švaňa, Miloš Němec, Radek |
author_facet | Zapletal, František Hudec, Miroslav Švaňa, Miloš Němec, Radek |
author_sort | Zapletal, František |
collection | PubMed |
description | Valuable information for decision-making can be obtained by collecting and analyzing opinions from diverse stakeholder or respondent groups, which usually have different backgrounds and are variously affected by the topics under survey. For this to succeed, it is necessary to manage the uncertainty of respondents’ opinions, different number of filled questionnaires among groups, different number of questions for each stakeholder group, and relevance of subsets of respondent groups. This work proposes handling the hesitance of respondents’ opinions for the rating scale questions. To evaluate the collected opinions, a three-level aggregation model is developed. In the first level, the overall opinion of each respondent is computed as a mean of fuzzy numbers covering uncertain answers and their respective hesitance. In the second level, stakeholder groups are considered as a whole. Aggregation by a relative quantifier is applied to calculate the validity of a proposition the majority of respondents have a positive or negative opinion. At the third level, the consensus among diverse subsets of stakeholder groups is calculated considering the relevance of each group independently as well as their so-called coalitions by Choquet integral. Finally, the proposed model is illustrated by a real-life case study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9912226 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99122262023-02-10 Three-level model for opinion aggregation under hesitance Zapletal, František Hudec, Miroslav Švaňa, Miloš Němec, Radek Soft comput Soft Computing in Decision Making and in Modeling in Economics Valuable information for decision-making can be obtained by collecting and analyzing opinions from diverse stakeholder or respondent groups, which usually have different backgrounds and are variously affected by the topics under survey. For this to succeed, it is necessary to manage the uncertainty of respondents’ opinions, different number of filled questionnaires among groups, different number of questions for each stakeholder group, and relevance of subsets of respondent groups. This work proposes handling the hesitance of respondents’ opinions for the rating scale questions. To evaluate the collected opinions, a three-level aggregation model is developed. In the first level, the overall opinion of each respondent is computed as a mean of fuzzy numbers covering uncertain answers and their respective hesitance. In the second level, stakeholder groups are considered as a whole. Aggregation by a relative quantifier is applied to calculate the validity of a proposition the majority of respondents have a positive or negative opinion. At the third level, the consensus among diverse subsets of stakeholder groups is calculated considering the relevance of each group independently as well as their so-called coalitions by Choquet integral. Finally, the proposed model is illustrated by a real-life case study. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-02-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9912226/ /pubmed/36789205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-07853-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Soft Computing in Decision Making and in Modeling in Economics Zapletal, František Hudec, Miroslav Švaňa, Miloš Němec, Radek Three-level model for opinion aggregation under hesitance |
title | Three-level model for opinion aggregation under hesitance |
title_full | Three-level model for opinion aggregation under hesitance |
title_fullStr | Three-level model for opinion aggregation under hesitance |
title_full_unstemmed | Three-level model for opinion aggregation under hesitance |
title_short | Three-level model for opinion aggregation under hesitance |
title_sort | three-level model for opinion aggregation under hesitance |
topic | Soft Computing in Decision Making and in Modeling in Economics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36789205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-07853-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zapletalfrantisek threelevelmodelforopinionaggregationunderhesitance AT hudecmiroslav threelevelmodelforopinionaggregationunderhesitance AT svanamilos threelevelmodelforopinionaggregationunderhesitance AT nemecradek threelevelmodelforopinionaggregationunderhesitance |